Skip to main content

From Media Policy to ‘Big’ Media Policy: The Battle for Pluralism in Australia

  • Chapter
Media Power and Plurality

Part of the book series: Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business ((GMPB))

Abstract

The year 2012 was a crucial turning point for media and journalism in many regions of the Western world. Sociologists frequently employ the term ‘critical junctures’ to explain the windows of opportunities for social change presented at specific times in history. The UK Leveson Inquiry into Culture, Practices, and Ethics of the Press was certainly one of the best examples of these ‘critical junctures’ that offered an unprecedented occasion to achieve structural reforms concerning media structures, journalism ethics and news standards. Certainly, the closure of the News of the World had a tangible effect in Australia, a country with direct links to UK media conglomerates, notably part of the Murdoch’s empire. In fact, the debate in the UK triggered the establishment in September 2011 of the Independent Media Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation in Australia, frequently referred to as the Finkelstein Review. When the News of the World scandal spread, Australia’s Labor Government had already initiated an official appraisal of the country’s media systems with the aim to review ‘the operation of media and communications legislation in Australia and to assess its effectiveness in achieving appropriate policy objectives for the convergent era’ (Convergence Review, 2012, p. 110).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Government (2014) ‘Media control and ownership: Policy background paper’ June 2014: http://www.presscouncil.org.au/uploads/52321/ufiles/Control_Background_Paper_Australian_Government_Department_of_Communications.pdf, date accessed 25th October.

  • Barnett, S. (2010) ‘What’s wrong with media monopolies? A lesson from history and a new approach to media ownership policy’, MEDIA@LSE Electronic Working Papers, No 18: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/mediaworkingpapers/pdf/ewp1 8.pdf

  • Baker, E. (2007). Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brevini, B. (2014) ‘Australia swims against the tide of democratic media reform’, The Conversation, 18h March: http://theconversation.com/australia-swims-against-the-tide-of-democratic-media-reform-24337, date accessed 25th October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brevini, B. and Schlosberg, J. (in press) ‘Between philosophy and action: The story of the media reform coalition’ In: J. Obar, D. Freedman, R. McChesney and C. Martens (eds) Strategies for Media Reform: International Perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch, H. K. (2002). Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Convergence Review (2012). Convergence Review Final Report. Canberra, ACT: Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily Telegraph (2013) ‘Press freedom is public freedom,’ 13th March: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/press-freedom-is-public-freedom/story-e6frezz0-1226595867820

  • Day, M. (2013, March 13). A long wait for a dog’s breakfast. The Australian. Retrieved from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opinion/a-long-wait-for-a-dogs-breakfast/story-e6frgd0x-1226595923345

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lizia, F. (2014) ‘How have press freedom and press freedom debates in Australia developed following the report of the independent inquiry into the media and media regulation by the Finkelstein review?’ unpublished Thesis, Sydney, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, T. (2014) ‘Press freedom discourse after Leveson: Ethics, elections and media concentration in Australia’, The Political Economy of Communication, 2(1), 49–59: http://www.polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981 [1970]) ‘The order of discourse. Inaugural lecture at the Collège de France 2nd December 1970’ In: Young R. (ed.) Untying the Text, a Post-structuralist Reader. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, R. (2012) Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation. Report to the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy. Canberra, ACT: Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. (2013) ‘Academics and activists in the policy process: Engage-ment with Australian media inquiries 2011–13’ In: The Role of Advocacy in Media and Telecom Policy, 29 September-1 October 2013, New America Foundation, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. and Swift, A. (2013) ‘Regulating journalists? The Finkelstein review, the convergence review, and news media regulation in Australia’, Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies, 2(1), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. and Goldsmith, B. (2013) ‘FactCheck: Does Murdoch own 70 per cent of newspapers in Australia?’ The Conversation, 8 August: The Conversation https://theconversation.com/factcheck-does-murdoch-own-70-of-newspapers-in-australia-16812, date accessed 3 November 2014.

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/knowledge: selected Interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. In Gordon, C. (ed.) Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R.A and Carroll, W.K. (2006a) Remaking Media: The Struggle to Democratize Public Communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, C. and Hill, M. (1993). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State, 2nd Edition. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P. (2014) Malcolm Turnbull says ABC cuts no big deal. The Australian, 14 September 2014: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/malcolm-turnbull-says-abc-cuts-no-big-deal/story-e6frg996-1227072056164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Select Committee on Broadcasting Legislation (2013) Three Broadcasting Reform Proposals http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=jscbl/report/chapter1.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (2012) Media Reviews: All Sound and Fury? Parliament of Australia: http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/prspub/1958137/upload_binary/1958137.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (2013) Media Reform: In Shallows and Misery. Parliament of Australia: http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/prspub/2798879/upload_binary/2798879.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2013) ‘These despots believe in controlling the press: Conroy joins them’, Daily Telegraph 13th March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. and Mortensen, J. (2013). Proposed Media Reforms http://www.corrs.com.au/publications/corrs-in-brief/proposed-media-reforms/, date accessed 10 November 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, H. (2004) ‘Beyond interests, ideas, and technology: An institutional approach to communication and information policy’, The Information Society, 20(3), 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (2000). Emancipation, the Media, and Modernity: Arguments about the Media and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kunzler, M. (2012). ‘“It’s the idea, stupid!” How ideas challenge broadcasting liberalization’ In: Just, N. and Puppis, M. (eds) Trends in Communicating Policy Research: New Theories, Methods and Subjects. ECREA Book Series (Vol. 7, pp. 55–74), United Kingdom: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson B. (2012) ‘An inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press: Executive summary’, The Leveson Inquiry, November. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidberg, J. (2012). ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it-Australian media industry attitudes to regulation and accountability reforms’, Pacific Journalism Review, 18(2), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidberg, J. and Hirst, M. (2013) ‘In the shadow of phone hacking: Media accountability inquiries in Australia,’ The Political Economy of Communication, 1(1), 111–121: http://polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/15/152, date accessed 7 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2014) ‘Media executives join forces to put their case for repeal of regulations to Turnbull,’ The Sydney Morning Herald: Business Day, 8 March, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2014) ‘Turnbull pushes ahead on moves that could reshape industry,’ 17th July: http://www.smh.com.au/business/turnbull-pushes-ahead-on-moves-that-could-reshape-industry-20140716-3c1mr.html, date accessed 10 November 2014.

  • News Limited (2012)’ submission to the independent inquiry into media and media regulation,’ 11 November 2011: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/ data/assets/pdf_file/0018/143055/News-Limited.pdf, date accessed 10 November 2014.

  • Nielsen (2013) Australian Connected Consumers 2013, p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen Online Ratings (2014) Top News Websites by unique Australian Audience, January 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papandrea, F. and Tiffen, R. (2011) Media concentration in Australia: http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Finternationalmedia.pbworks.com%2Ff%2FDraft%2BAustralian%2BChapter%2B%2528June2011_Rev%2529.docx&ei=ROxvVMiYFI_q8AXt7YGABA&usg=AFQjCNGNu4OqNq_rL0rGfLxp5VdkI3Vs3Q&bvm=bv.80185997,d.dGc

  • Pickard, V. (2013). ‘Social democracy or corporate libertarianism? Conflicting media policy narratives in the wake of market failure’, Communication Theory, 23 (4), pp. 336–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketson, M. (2012) ‘The Finkelstein inquiry: You wouldn’t read about it’, 21th May: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-21/ricketson-the-finkelstein-inquiry3a-you-wouldn27t-read-about-/4022628, date accessed 28 October

  • The Courier Mail (2013) ‘Draconian law crosses the line’, 13th March: http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/editorial-draconian-law-crosses-the-line/story-e6frerc6-1226596023358?nk=e2ea0ba090de0104a2686cbbf27beea6, date accessed 1 November.

  • Tingle, L. (2013) Full impact of Conroy’s media proposals is hidden. Financial Review. Retrieved from: http://www.afr.com/p/national/full_impact_of_conroy_media_proposals_837fL7ioMkztlWycIwh8CO

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D. et al. (2014)’ scrap cross-media ownership rules: Fairfax,’ 24th February 2014: http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/scrap-crossmedia-ownership-rules-fairfax-20140224-33chq.html, date accessed 14 November.

  • White, D. (2014) ‘Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull: Higher level of consensus needed between media owners before cross-media ownership change,’ 21th August: http://www.smh.com.au/business/communications-minister-malcolm-turnbull-higher-level-of-consensus-needed-between-media-owners-before-crossmedia-ownership-change-20140821-106l4l.html, date accessed 14 November.

  • Williams, K. (2013) An aggressive attempt to silence your media. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved from: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/an-aggressive-attempt-to-silence-your-media/story-e6frezz0-1226595884130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Benedetta Brevini

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brevini, B. (2015). From Media Policy to ‘Big’ Media Policy: The Battle for Pluralism in Australia. In: Barnett, S., Townend, J. (eds) Media Power and Plurality. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137522849_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics