Abstract
In United States media policy, issues of media pluralism and diversity have been tightly intertwined with the issue of media ownership. In the US, the media ownership issue involves not only concerns about ownership concentration and its anti-competitive effects in the economic marketplace and in the marketplace of ideas; but also concerns about the levels of media ownership amongst historically disadvantaged groups such as women and minorities. In this regard, then, the media ownership issue in the US becomes interconnected with pluralism and diversity-related concerns about a robust marketplace of ideas and minority and gender representation in both the structure and content of the media system. And, of course, these social and political dimensions coexist with economic concerns about the relationship between the ownership structure of media markets and the economic functioning of these markets. From a policy standpoint, all of these concerns need to be addressed within a media environment that has, over the past two decades, been in a period of tremendous volatility and ongoing technological change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beresteanu, A. and Ellickson, P. B. (2007) Minority and Female Ownership in Media Enterprises. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.
Blevins, J. L. and Brown, D. (2006) ‘Political issue or policy matter?: The US federal communications commission’s third biennial review of broadcast ownership rules’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 30, 21–41.
Blevins, J. L. and Brown, D. (2010) ‘Concerns about the disproportionate use of economic research in the FCC’s media ownership studies from 2002–2007’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 603–620.
Bogenschneider, K. and Corbett, T. J. (2010) Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-minded Researchers and Research-minded Policymakers. New York: Routledge.
Bush, C. A. (2007) ‘Minority and women broadcast ownership data’ In: Duwadi, K., Roberts, S., and Wise, A. (eds) Ownership Structure and Robustness of Media: FCC Media Ownership Study #2 http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attach-match/DA-07-3470A3.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Cooper, M. (2007) ‘Biased questions yield biased answers: How the FCC loaded the dice in setting its media ownership research agenda’, Report from the Consumer Federation of America: http://www.savetheinternet.com/sites/default/files/resources/biased_fcc_research_agenda.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Cooper, M. (2008, May). ‘Junk science and administrative abuse in the effort of the FCC to eliminate limits on media concentration’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association.
Crawford, G. S. (2007) ‘Television station ownership structure and the quantity and quality of TV programming: FCC media ownership study #3’: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf, date accessed 12 December 2014.
Eggerton, J. (2014) ‘House to hold hearing on FCC study’, Multichannel News, 25 February: http://www.multichannel.com/news/policy/house-hold-hearing-fcc-study/307382, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Federal Communications Commission (2001) ‘FCC chairman Powell announces creation of media ownership working group’, News Release http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/2001/nrmc0124.html, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Federal Communications Commission (2002) ‘FCC releases 12 studies on current media marketplace’ News Release http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A1.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Federal Communications Commission (2004) ‘In re broadcast localism, notice of inquiry’, 19 F.C.C.R. 12, 425.
Federal Communications Commission (2009) ‘Promoting diversification of ownership in the broadcasting services, Report and Order and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking’, MB Docket No. 07-294, 24 FCC Rcd 5896.
Federal Communications Commission (2014) ‘2014 Quadrennial Regulatory Review-Review of the commission’s broadcast ownership rules and other rules adopted pursuant to section 202 of the telecommunications act of 1996, further notice of proposed rulemaking and report and order, MB Docket No. 14-50: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-14-28A1.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Flint, J. (2014) ‘FCC cancels study after backlash from lawmakers’, LA Times, 28 February: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-fcc-cin-study-20140228-story.html, date accessed 16 December 2014.
Friedland, L., Napoli, P. M., Ognayanova, K., Weil, C., and Wilson, E. J. (2012) ‘Review of the literature regarding critical information needs of the American public: Report prepared for the federal communications commission’: http://transition.fcc.gov/bureaus/ocbo/Final_Literature_Review.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Goldfarb, C. B. (2007) ‘CRS report for Congress: The FCC’s 10 commissioned economic research studies on media ownership: Policy implications’, Congressional Research Service http://cdm15025.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p266301coll9/id/113, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Hammond, A. S. (2007) ‘The impact of the FCC’s Duopoly rule relaxation on minority and women owned broadcast stations, 1999–2006’, Report Prepared for the Federal Communications Commission https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A9.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Henig, R. (2009) Spin Cycle: How Research is used in Policy Debates: The Case of Charter Schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hinchey, M. D., Stupak, B., Baldwin, T., Slaughter, L. M., and Price, D. (2007) ‘Letter to Kevin Martin, FCC Chairman’ 14 September: http://votesmart.org/public-statement/231585/letter-to-fcc-chairman-kevin-j-martin-economic-studies-on-media-ownership#.VJCbdk3wtD8, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Institute for Public Representation (2007) ‘Complaint for declaratory and injunc-tive relief’ 16 November.
Jessell, H. A. (2013) ‘The FCC should stay out of TV newsrooms’, TV NewsCheck, 13 December: http://www.tvnewscheck.com/article/72691/the-fcc-should-stay-out-of-tv-newsrooms, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Kingdon, J. (2010) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (updated 2nd ed.), New York: Pearson.
Kunz, W. M. (2012) ‘FCC studies of the television marketplace under George W. Bush: Flawed measurements and invalid conclusions’, Democratic Communique, 25(2), 1–21.
Make, J. (2007) ‘November FCC Meeting to Focus on Cable Industry’, Communications Daily, 14 November.
Marx, L.M. (2006)’ summary of ideas on newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership’: http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/newly-released/newspaper-broadcast061506.pdf, date accessed 10 December, 2014.
McDowell, R. M. (2008, April 23) ‘Keynote address at the Quello communications law and policy symposium’: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281772A1.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
McGarity, T. O. (1991) Reinventing Rationality: The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McSlarrow, K. E. (2007) ‘Letter to Kevin J. Martin, FCC Chairman’, 14 November.
Mihal, C. (2008, June) ‘Research as Alibi: Analysis of the FCC’s 2007 media ownership studies’. Paper presented at the National Conference for Media Reform. Milyo, J. (2007) ‘The effects of cross-ownership on the local content and political slant of local television news’: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Napoli, P. M. (2001) Foundations of Communications Policy: Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Napoli, P. M. (2008) ‘Paradoxes of media policy analysis: Implications for public interest media regulation’, Administrative Law Review, 60, 801–812.
Napoli, P. M. and Gillis, N. (2006) ‘Reassessing the potential contribution of communications research to communications policy: The case of media ownership’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 671–691.
Napoli, P. M. and Karaganis, J. (2007) ‘Toward a Federal data agenda for communications policymaking’, Comm Law Conspectus: The Journal of Communications Law & Policy, 16, 53–96.
Napoli, P. M. and Karaganis, J. (2010) ‘On making public policy with publicly available data: The case of US communications policymaking’, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 384–391.
Napoli, P. M. and Seaton, M. (2007) ‘Necessary knowledge for communications policy: Information asymmetries and commercial data access and usage in the policymaking process’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 59, 295–329.
Office of the Inspector General (2007) ‘Report of investigation into allegations that senior management ordered research suppressed or destroyed’, Federal Communications Commission.
Pai, A. (2014) ‘The FCC wades into the newsroom,’ Wall Street Journal, 10 February.
Rennhoff, A. D. and Wilbur, K. C. (2011) ‘Local media ownership and media quality’: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1803256, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Scott, B. (2004) ‘The politics and policy of media ownership,’ American University Law Review, 53, 645–677.
Shiman, D., Lynch, K., Stroup, C., and Almoguera, P. (2007) ‘News operations: FCC media ownership study #4’: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attach-match/DA-07-3470A5.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Social Solutions International (2013) ‘Research design for the multi-market study of critical information needs’. Prepared for the Federal Communications Commission: http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/research-design-multi-market-study-critical-information-needs, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Spavins, T., Dennison, L., Frenette, J., and Roberts, S. (2002) ‘The measurement of local television news and public affairs programs: FCC media ownership study #7’: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A12.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Stone D. (2001) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision-making (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Turner, S. D. and Cooper, M. (2006) ‘Out of the picture: Minority and female TV station ownership in the United States’: http://www.freepress.net/sites/default/files/fp-legacy/out_of_the_picture.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Upton, et al. (2013, December 10) ‘Letter to FCC chairman Tom Wheeler’: http://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/files/letters/20131210FCC.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Vavreck, L., Jackman, S., and Lewis, J. B. (2011) ‘Report to the FCC: How the ownership structure of media markets affects civic engagement and political knowledge, 2006–2008’: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307489A1.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Waldfogel, J. (2011) ‘Radio station ownership structure and the provision of Programming to minority audiences: Evidence from 2005 to 2009’, Report prepared for the federal communications commission: https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308591A1.pdf, date accessed 10 December 2014.
York, B. (2014) ‘Four of five FCC study authors gave to Obama’, Washington Examiner, 27 February: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/four-of-five-fcc-study-authors-gave-to-obama/article/2544837, date accessed 10 December 2014.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Philip M. Napoli
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Napoli, P.M. (2015). Media Ownership and the Political Economy of Research in US Media Policymaking. In: Barnett, S., Townend, J. (eds) Media Power and Plurality. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137522849_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137522849_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50664-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52284-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)