American Civil-Military Relations



The basic question underlying this book is: How have military personnel been treated when it comes to permitting them to vote, especially if they were in the field or otherwise deployed away from their home precincts? Related to that is the question of the relationship between Americans and their armed forces. The unevenness of that relationship speaks much to how elected officials have decided to resolve the issue of whether to grant service personnel the right to vote in absentia.


Military Personnel Military Force Officer Corps Military Culture Civilian World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Samuel P. Huntington. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press;Google Scholar
  2. Morris Janowitz. 1960. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Peter D. Feaver. 1996a. “The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz and the Question of Civilian Control.” Armed Forces and Societ. 23(2): 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Peter D. Feaver. 1996b. “An American Crisis in Civilian Control and Civil-Military Relations?” The Tocqueville Revie. 17(1): 159–182.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Max Farrand. 1911. Records of the Federal Convention of 1787. 4 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press 1:465.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Robert A. Pollard. 1985. Economic Security and the Origins of the Cold War, 1945–1950. New York: Columbia University Press;Google Scholar
  7. John W. Chambers. 1987. To Raise an Army: The Draft Comes to Modern America. New York: Free Press;Google Scholar
  8. George Q. Flynn. 2000. The Draft, 1940–1973. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    A classic among the warnings about militarization of society is Pearl S. Buck. 1949. “New Evidence of the Militarization of America.” National Council against Conscription. Other writing along the same line includes Fred J. Cook. 1962. The Warfare State. New York: Macmillan;Google Scholar
  10. Irving Louis Horowitz. 1963. The War Game. New York: Ballentine Books;Google Scholar
  11. Tristram Coffin. 1964. The Passion of the Hawks. New York: Macmillan;Google Scholar
  12. John Swomley. 1964. The Military Establishment. Boston, MA: Beacon Press;Google Scholar
  13. Erwin Knoll and Judith Nies McFadden. 1969. American Militarism 1970. New York: Viking Press;Google Scholar
  14. and M. Vincent Hayes. 1973. “Is the Military Taking Over?” New Priorities: A Magazine for Activist. 1(4). London: Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. 7.
    C. Wright Mills. 1956. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press;Google Scholar
  16. C. Wright Mills. 1958. The Causes of World War III. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. 8.
    William T. R. Fox. 1961. “Representativeness and Efficiency: Dual Problem of Civil-Military Relations” Political Science Quarterl. 76(3): 354–366;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Vincent Hayes. 1973. “Is the Military Taking Over?”;Google Scholar
  19. Peter Karsten. 1971. “ROTC, MyLai and the Volunteer Army.” Foreign Polic. 6 (Spring): 135–160.Google Scholar
  20. 9.
    Huntington. 1957. Soldier and the Stat., viii.Google Scholar
  21. 10.
    Huntington. 1957. Soldier and the Stat., 79, 92;Google Scholar
  22. Feaver. 1996a. “Civil-Military Problematique,”159.Google Scholar
  23. 11.
    Feaver. 1996a. “Civil-Military Problematique.”Google Scholar
  24. 12.
    Huntington. 1957. Soldier and the Stat., 457.Google Scholar
  25. 13.
    Gene Lyons. 1961. “The New Civil-Military Relations.” American Political Science Revie. 55(1);Google Scholar
  26. Irving Louis Horowitz. 1963. War Game.;Google Scholar
  27. Harold Wool. 1968. The Military Specialist. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press;Google Scholar
  28. Erwin Knoll and Judith Nies McFadden, eds. 1969. American Militarism 1970. New York: Viking Press;Google Scholar
  29. M. Vincent Hayes. 1973. “Is the Military Taking Over?”Google Scholar
  30. 14.
    Morris Janowitz. 1960. Professional Soldie.;Google Scholar
  31. Feaver. 1996a. “Civil-Military Problematique.”Google Scholar
  32. 15.
    Carl von Clausewitz. 1989. On War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 16.
    Harry G. Summers. 1984. On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War. New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. 17.
    H. R. McMaster. 1997. Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  35. 18.
    Peter D. Feaver. 1996a. “Civil-Military Problematique.”Google Scholar
  36. 19.
    Peter D. Feaver. 2003. Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peter D. Feaver. 1998. “Crisis as Shirking: An Agency Theory Explanation of the Souring of American Civil-Military Relations.” Armed Forces and Societ. 24(3): 407–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 20.
    Feaver. 2003. Armed Servant.;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mackubin Thomas Owens. 2003. “Civilian Rumsfeld: Overseeing the Military.” National Review Online. Accessed March 29, 2009.Google Scholar
  40. 21.
    Feaver, Peter D. 1998. “Crisis as Shirking.”Google Scholar
  41. 23.
    Alfred Vagts. 1937. A History of Militarism: A Romance and Realities of a Profession. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 11–15.Google Scholar
  42. 24.
    Louis Smith. 1951. American Democracy and Military Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. 25.
    Lindsay Cohn. 1999. “The Evolution of the Civil-Military ‘Gap’ Debate.” Paper prepared for the TISS project on the gap between the military and civilian society. Accessed March 2, 2015.Google Scholar
  44. 26.
    Charles William Maynes. 1998. “The Perils of (and for) an Imperial America.” Foreign Polic. 111(Summer): 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 27.
    David Tarr and Peter Roman. 1998. “The Military Is Still in Close Contact with Civilians.” Biloxi Sun Herald. October 19.Google Scholar
  46. 28.
    C. J. Chivers. 1999. “Military Fights an Imaginary Rift With the Public.” USA Today. September 14, 17.Google Scholar
  47. 29.
    See Mark J. Eitelberg and Roger G. Little. 1995. “Influential Elites and the American Military after the Cold War” in U.S. Civil-Military Relations: In Crisis or Transitio., ed. Donald M. Snider and Miranda A. Carlton-Carew. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies;Google Scholar
  48. Andrew J. Bacevich and Richard H. Kohn. 1997. “Grand Army of the Republicans: Has the U.S. Military Become a Partisan Force?” The New Republi. 217 (23–28) Dec): 22 ff;Google Scholar
  49. Maynes. 1998. “Imperial America.”Google Scholar
  50. 30.
    Donald K. Muchow. 1995. “A Preliminary Analysis of American Values of Life and Community.” JSCOPE 95. Available at 95/ruchow 95.html.Google Scholar
  51. 31.
    Fred Tasker. 1990. “Who Are Today’s Soldiers—and Why?” The Seattle Time., F1, September 27;Google Scholar
  52. Martin Binkin. 1993. Who Will Fight the Next War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  53. 32.
    Judith Hicks Stiehm. 1996. “The Civilian Mind.” in It’s Our Military, Too. Ed. Judith Hicks Stiehm. Philadephia: Temple University Press;Google Scholar
  54. Don M. Snider and Miranda A. Carlton-Carew, eds. 1995. U.S. Civil-Military Relations: In Crisis or Transition. Washington DC: The Center for Strategic and International Studies;Google Scholar
  55. George Will. 1997. “Lott, and Others, Need to Butt Out.” The Plain Deale., 5F, May 25;Google Scholar
  56. Richard Danzig. 1999. The Big Three: Our Greatest Security Risks and How to Address Them. New York: Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  57. 33.
    Elizabeth Kier. 1999. “Discrimination and Military Cohesion: An Organizational Perspective,” in Beyond Zero Tolerance: Discrimination in Military Cultur., ed. Mary Fainsod Katzenstein and Judith Reppy. New York: Alexshan Books.Google Scholar
  58. 34.
    Cohn. 1999. “Civil-Military ‘Gap’ Debate.”Google Scholar
  59. 35.
    Peter Maslowski. 1990. “Army Values and American Values” Military Revie., April 1990: 11–22;Google Scholar
  60. Bacevich and Kohn. 1997. “Grand Army”;Google Scholar
  61. Chivers. 1999. “Military Fights” 17;Google Scholar
  62. Peter D. Feaver. 1999. “Civil-Military Relations.” Annual Review of Political Scienc. 2: 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 36.
    J. F. McIsaac & N. Verdugo. 1995. “Civil-Military Relations: A Domestic Perspective,” in U.S. Civil-Military Relations in Crisis of Transition. Ed. D. M. Snider and M. A. Carlton-Carew. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 21–33.Google Scholar
  64. 37.
    Eitelberg and Little. 1995. “Influential Elites”;Google Scholar
  65. Otto Kreisher. 1997. “Culture Gap: A review of Making the Corps.” San Diego Union-Tribun., November 23;Google Scholar
  66. Harry Levins. 1996. “They Paid for Peace with Courage; But Now, Veterans’ Ranks Slowly Dwindle.” St. Louis Post-Dispatc., 1B, November 10;Google Scholar
  67. Stephen M. Duncan 1997. Citizen Warriors: America’s National Guard and Reserve Forces & the Politics of National Security. Novato, CA: Presidio Press.Google Scholar
  68. 38.
    Sam Sarkesian with John Allen Williams and Fred B. Bryant. 1995. Soldiers, Society, and National Security. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers;Google Scholar
  69. David R. Segal. 1995. “U.S. Civil-Military Relations in the Twenty-First Century: A Sociologist’s View.” in U.S. Civil-Military Relations: In Crisis or Transition. ed. Don M. Snider and Miranda A. Carlton-Carew. Washington, DC: The Center for Strategic and International Studies;Google Scholar
  70. Otto Kreisher. 1997. “Culture Gap: A Review of Mak ing the Corps.” San Diego Union-Tribun., 23 November;Google Scholar
  71. Anna Simons. 1997. “In Your Face: The Making of a Marine: A Review of Making the Corps.” The Christian Science Monitor, December 15.Google Scholar
  72. 39.
    Richard H. Kohn. 1974. “The All-Volunteer Army: Too High a Price?” Proceedings of the U.S. Naval Institut. 100 (3/853): 35–42;Google Scholar
  73. Andrew J. Bacevich and Richard H. Kohn. 1997. “Grand Army.”Google Scholar
  74. 40.
    Cohn. 1999. “Civil-Military ‘Gap’ Debate;Google Scholar
  75. Elizabeth Kier. 1999. “Discrimination and Military Cohesian.”Google Scholar
  76. 41.
    Curtis L. Gilroy. 1995. “Civil-Military Operations and the Military Mission: Differences between Military and Influential Elites,” U.S. Civil-Military Relation., ed. Snider and Carlton-Carew. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies;Google Scholar
  77. Sarkesian, Williams, and Bryant. 1995. Soldiers, Societ.;Google Scholar
  78. Harry Levins. 1996. “Veterans’ Ranks Slowly Dwindle”;Google Scholar
  79. Michael Williams. 1998. Civil-Military Relations and Peacekeeping. Adelphi Paper 321. International Institute for Strategic Studies. New York: Oxford University Press;Google Scholar
  80. Danzig. 1999. The Big Thre.;Google Scholar
  81. Henry H. Shelton. 1998. “The American Military Is Still in Close Contact with Civilians.” Biloxi Sun Herald. October 19.Google Scholar
  82. 42.
    Duncan. 1997. Citizen Warrior.;Google Scholar
  83. Bacevich and Kohn. 1997. “Grand Army”;Google Scholar
  84. Charles William Maynes. 1998. “Imperial America.”;Google Scholar
  85. Thomas Ricks. 1998. “Is American Military Professionalism Declining?” Proceedings of the U.S. Naval Institut., July 1998;Google Scholar
  86. Charles Moskos, John Allen Williams, and David R. Segal. 2000. The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  87. 43.
    Joseph S. Nye. 1996. “Epilogue: The Liberal Tradition,” in Civil-Military Relations and Democrac., ed. Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press;Google Scholar
  88. Shelton. 1998. “American Military”;Google Scholar
  89. Michael Williams. 1998. Civil-Military Relation.;Google Scholar
  90. Stephan Rosenfeld. 1999. “Ready for the Last War.” Washington Post. January 15, 29.Google Scholar
  91. 44.
    Thomas E. Ricks. 1997b. Making the Corps. New York: Scribner;Google Scholar
  92. Anna Simons. 1997. “In Your Face.”;Google Scholar
  93. Charles Moskos. 1999. “Short-Term Soldiers.” The Washington Post. A19, March 8;Google Scholar
  94. Charles Rangel. 2006a. “Rangel Reintroduces Draft Bill.” Press release, Office of Congressman Charles Rangel, 15th District New York. Accessed March 13, 2015;Google Scholar
  95. Kate Philips. 2009. “National Service Corps Bill Clears Senate Hurdle.” New York Times. March 23. Accessed March 13, 2015;Google Scholar
  96. Flagg K. Youngblood. 2007. “Dodging Rangel’s Draft.” New York Post. February 17. Scholar
  97. 46.
    Peter D. Feaver and Richard H. Kohn, Eds. 2001. Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security. Cambridge: MIT Press;Google Scholar
  98. Peter D. Feaver. 2011. “The Right to Be Right: Civil Military Relations and the Iraq Surge Decision.” International Securit. 35 (4): 87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Barry Rubin and Thomas A. Keany. 2001. Armed Forces in the Middle East: Politics and Strategy. New York: Routledge;Google Scholar
  100. Barbara A. Bicksler, Curtis L. Gilroy, and John T. Warner, eds. 2004. The All-Volunteer Force: Thirty Years of Service. Washington, DC: Brassey’s;Google Scholar
  101. Allan D. English. 2004. Understanding Military Culture: A Canadian Perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press;Google Scholar
  102. Christopher Patrick Gibson. 2008. Securing the State: Reforming the National Security Decisionmaking Process at the Civil-Military Nexus. Burlington, V T: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Donald S. Inbody 2016

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations