Abstract
One of the key conditions for religiousgroups to obtain legal recognition by the state in the Swiss Canton of Vaud is the capacity to provide a unique representative in its dealings with the political authorities of the canton. Nobody expected that this apparently trivial and mundane task, especially for small population samples at the regional level, would turn out to become the stumbling block for Orthodox communities at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Though numerically a tiny minority, the Orthodox in the Canton of Vaud are ethnically very diverse: Serbs, Russians, Romanians, Greeks, and a few local converts populate the “Orthodox landscape” in the region, which is organized correspondingly in ethnic parishes placed under the jurisdiction of national churches back home. Five different bishops (belonging to the Serbian Orthodox Church, the Romanian Orthodox Church, the Russian Orthodox Church, the Russian Orthodox Church outside Russia, and the Ecumenical Patriarchate) are in charge of these parishes, and only two of them have residence in Switzerland. Some of the bishops did not give their blessing for their parishes to form a politically involved seculczr structure, which would mean that, in some particular matters, the respective parishes would follotv instructions frovn an authority other than ecclesiastical.
Some of the arguments developed in this chapter have been discussed previously in Maria Hämmerli, “Orthodox Diaspora? A Sociological and Theological Problematisation of a Stock Phrase,” International journal for the Study of the Christian Church 10, no. 2 (2010): 97–115.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Jean Zizioulas, L’Eucharistie, l’Evégue et l’Eglise (Paris: Desclée Brouwer, 1994).
Sergei Bulgakov, The Orthodox Church (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1988); K. Ware, The Orthodox Church (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1993).
The idea of precedence and rank of honor is suggested in the diptychs, a term that describes the order in which Orthodox Churches commemorate each other at their patriarchal liturgies and that reflects their history, the mutual recognition of this history and relations among the local churches; see J. McGuckin, The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to its History, Doctrine, and Spiritual Culture (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).
Though based on early Church experience and tradition (or rather the claim to offer a more “authentic” reinterpretation of tradition), this theological development can be called an innovation. Innovation in the Orthodox Church is introduced never as such but rather as a return to a more accurate interpretation of tradition. For an analysis of this phenomenon, see Trine Willert and Lina Molokotos-Liederman, eds., Innovation in the Orthodox Christian Tradition? (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), and Maria Hämmerli and Jean-François Mayer, eds., Orthodox Identities in Western Europe: Migration, Settlement and Innovation (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014).
Nikolaj Afanassieff, “The Ministry of the Laity in the Church,” Ecttmenical Reviem 10, no. 3 (1958): 255–63.
G. Crow, This Holy Man: Impressions of Metropolitan Anthony (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2005).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Maria Hämmerli
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hämmerli, M. (2016). Orthodox Church(es) Stepping out of the Orthodox Heartland. In: Snyder, S., Ralston, J., Brazal, A.M. (eds) Church in an Age of Global Migration. Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137518125_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137518125_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55616-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51812-5
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)