Skip to main content

Abstract

Turkey has a classic two-stage legal education to prepare lawyers for practice as an avukat. The academic stage at the university was heavily influenced by the German legal tradition, and is reputed to be theory heavy, with little practical application of the law.1 This climate of legal education is one reason why it is taking a while for the value of experiential learning, as reflected in the law clinic experience, to take hold in Turkish law faculties, which are not involved in the second stage of vocational training of lawyers. Another issue, discussed below, is that the bar associations are suspicious of the new legal clinics and consider that they breach the monopoly of The avukat in providing legal advice.2 However, one can point to the 2007 Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) Recommendation on Training Outcomes for European Lawyers,3 which sets out the legal and practical skills that lawyers should have, without specifying at which stage of legal education they should be attained, as being supportive of legal clinics.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a short introduction to the legal education of lawyers in Turkey, see Julian Lonbay and Musa Toprak, Legal Education in Turkey (UTBA, 2014), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In this sense, see Richard Wilson, “Western Europe: Last Holdout in the Worldwide Acceptance of Clinical Legal Education – Part I/II” (2009) 10 German L.J. 823–846, http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=1123, accessed October 20, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For further information on Turkish higher education system, please see Julian Lonbay and Musa Toprak, “From Ottoman to Bologna,” in Shuvro P. Sarker (ed.) Legal Education in Asia (Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See generally Latham & Watkins LLP, A Survey of Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Selected Jurisdictions, 2010, http://www.probonoinst.org/wpps/wp-content/uploads/pro-bono-survey-sep2010.pdf, accessed October 20, 2014 at 220 f and İdil Elveriş (n 8) at 8 f.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard J. Wilson, “Généraux du XVIIIème Congrès de l’Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé” [General Reports of the XVIIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law/Rapports], in Karen B. Brown and David V. Snyder (eds.) The Role of Practical Education (Springer, 2012) 80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Shuvro Prosun Sarker

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lonbay, J., Toprak, M. (2015). Legal Clinics in Turkey. In: Sarker, S.P. (eds) Clinical Legal Education in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137517531_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics