Skip to main content

Conclusion

How Far Have We Gone

  • Chapter
Screening Post-1989 China
  • 141 Accesses

Abstract

Ihave researched filmic and TV representations of three forms of subjectivity in order to understand how cultural producers negotiate and create within a restricted creative system. Screen products allow us to investigate the complex power dynamics interwoven by the cultural policies of zhuxuanlu and censorship, cultural workers, and viewers, in which power and agency is executed, affirmed, and reclaimed, yet also restrained or counterbalanced by opposing forces. Although the state, in managing cultural policies, has structural supremacy in attempting to manipulate ideology in screen products, its cultural policies are by no means omnipotent or boundless. My six chapters have illustrated that cultural workers and viewers are active participants in the production and interpretation of cultural products in general and screen products in particular, and they have provided answers to the question of “How far can we go?” that I posed in the Introduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Although Jason McGrath, quoting Chris Berry, reminds us of the fact that some alleged, “banned” films have never been near a censor. I suspect that filmmakers of these films are aware of the censoring bureau’s standards and are able to predict that their films are not pleasant to the state. See Jason McGrath, “The Urban Generation: Underground and Independent Films from the PRC,” in The Chinese Cinema Book, ed. Song Hwee Lim and Julian Ward (Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: British Film Institute, 2011), 169.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A recent study to fill this gap is Kenny Ng’s article on censorship in postwar Hong Kong. See Kenny Ng, “Inhibition vs. Exhibition: Political Censorship of Chinese and Foreign Cinemas in Postwar Hong Kong,” Journal of Chinese Cinemas 2, no. 1 (2008): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. There is a recent piece of scholarship that aims to fill this research gap. See Ying Zhu and Bruce Robinson, “Cross-Fertilization in Chinese Cinema and Television: A Strategic Turn in Cultural Policy,” in A Companion to Chinese Cinema, ed. Yingjin Zhang (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), 429–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Xudong, Dangdai Zhongguo yingshi wenhua yanjiu 當代中國影視文化研究 [Contemporary cultural studies of film and TV], (Beijing: Peking University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mary Farquhar and Yingjin Zhang, “Introduction: Chinese Stars,” Journal of Chinese Cinemas 2, no. 2 (2008): 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. For example, Hsiu-Chuang Deppman has discussed the transnational cultural and social significance of the popular Taiwanese drama Liuxing huayuan 流星花園 [Meteor Garden]. See Hsiu-Chuang Deppman, “Made in Taiwan: An Analysis of Meteor Garden as an East Asian Idol Drama,” in TV China, ed. Ying Zhu and Chris Berry (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009), 90–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Wing Shan Ho

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ho, W.S. (2015). Conclusion. In: Screening Post-1989 China. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514707_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics