Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Training Participants: Building a Community of Practice to Negotiate Sustainability

  • Chapter
Knowing Governance

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy ((SKP))

Abstract

Sometime over the last two decades, the call for public participation seems to have turned sides. Where once social movements demanded inclusion in policy-making, governments are now asking or even demanding citizens and NGOs to get actively involved. In this turn, participation — and perhaps democracy itself — has become both a policy goal and a means of governing (Uitermark/Van Beek 2010). Participation is now widely embraced as a key element of the shift ‘from government to governance’, including by the EU, the UN, and most national and regional governments around the world (Bulkely/Mol 2003). Listed benefits of participation include higher levels of democratic legitimacy and local support, and increased effectiveness and efficiency of policy implementation. Governments’ demand for effective methods of participation has engendered a new domain for experts and professionals to provide knowledge and services in the design and management of interactions between state and civil society (Van der Arend 2007; Chilvers 2008). The dynamics in the market for these services may even generate a ‘supply push’ for particular participation methods — or ‘technologies of participation’, as they might be called in this respect (Voß/Simons 2014). So, over the years, participation has evolved from a socio-political ideal to an organisational issue, something to be understood by a new type of experts in the role of process managers, facilitators, or officeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arts, B., Behagel, J., Van Bommel, S., De Koning, J., and Turnhout, E. (2013) Forest and nature governance. A practice based approach (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Behagel, J. H. and Arts, B. (2014) ‘Democratic governance and political rationalities in the implementation of the water framework directive in the Netherlands’, Public Administration, 92, 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behagel, J. H. and Van der Arend, S. H. (2013) ‘What institutions do: Grasping participatory practices in the Water Framework Directive’, in Bas Arts et al. (eds.) Forest and nature governance. A practice based approach (Dordrecht: Springer), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2010) Democratic governance (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boelens, R. (2008) The rules of the game and the game of the rules: Normalization and resistance in Andean water control (Dissertation, Wageningen: Wageningen University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, A. (2012) ‘The paradox of participation experiments’, Science Technology Human Values, 37, 506–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, K. and Schultz, S. (2010) ‘“… a certain amount of engineering involved”: Constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements’, Public Understanding of Science, 19, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkely, H. and Mol, A. P. J. (2003) ‘Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate’, Environmental Values, 12(2), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (2007) ‘What does it mean to say that economics is performative?’, in D. MacKenzie, F. Munieza, and L. Siu (eds.) Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, J. (2008) ‘Environmental risk, uncertainty, and participation: Mapping an emergent epistemic community’, Environment and Planning A, 40, 2990–3008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. and Franks, T. (2005) How institutions elude design: River basin management and sustainable livelihoods, Research Paper No. 12 (Bradford Centre for International Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001) Participation: The new tyranny? (London: Zed Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, B. (1999) The will to empower. Democratic citizens and other subjects (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L. and Quack, S. (2010) Transnational communities: Shaping global economic governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, S. E. (2004) ‘The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felt, U. and Fochler, M. (2010) ‘Machineries for making publics: Inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement’, Minerva, 48, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. and Ury, W. (1981) Getting to YES. Negotiating agreement without giving in (New York: Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997) ‘What is critique?’, in S. Lotringer and L. Hochroth (eds.) The politics of truth (New York: Semiotext(e)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppen, I. (2013) ‘The passionate professional’, Reflections on 20 Years Sustainability Challenge Foundation and International Programmes on the Management of Sustainability (IPMS). Speech given on Tuesday, 11 June 2013, 17h30, Bergse Bossen, Driebergen, Netherlands, Date accessed 14 November 2014, available at: http://www.scfoundation.org/userfiles/files/20%20years%20SCF%20IPMS%20-%20 Ida%20Koppen(1).pdf

  • Krott, M. and Giessen, L. (2014) ‘Learning from practices — Implications of the “practice based approach” for forest and environmental policy research’, Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, B. (2011) ‘Technologies of democracy: Experiments and demonstrations’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 649–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. and Urry, J. (2004) ‘Enacting the social’, Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C. (2000) ‘Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development. Toward a negotiation approach’, Development and Change, 31, 931–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezaun, J. and Soneryd, L. (2007) ‘Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics’, Public Understanding of Science, 16, 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1997) ‘Tacit knowledge’, in L. Prusak (ed.) Knowledge in organizations — Resources for the knowledge-based economy (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rap, E. (2006) ‘The success of a policy model: Irrigation management transfer in Mexico’, Journal of Development Studies, 42, 1301–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2000) ‘Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes’, Governance, 13, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. E. (2013) IPMS 20 years later, Date accessed 13 November 2014, available at: http://www.scfoundation.org/userfiles/files/IPMS%2020%20YEARS%20LATER_Larry%20Susskind.pdf

  • Susskind, L. E., McKearnen, S., and Thomas-Lamar, J. (1999) The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tews, K., Busch, P. O., and Jörgens, H. (2003) ‘The diffusion of new environmental policy instruments’, European Journal of Political Research, 42, 569–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., and Aarts, N. (2010) ‘How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice’, Ecology and Society, 15(4), 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J. and Van Beek, K. (2010) ‘Gesmoorde participatie. Over de schaduwkanten van “meedoen” als staatsproject’, in I. Verhoeven and M. Ham (eds.) Brave burgers gezocht. De grenzen van de activerende overheid (Amsterdam: Van Gennep) (Smothered participation. On the dark sides of ‘joining’ as a state project).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Arend, S. H. (2007) Pleitbezorgers, procesmanagers en participanten. Interactief beleid en de rolverdeling tussen overheid en burgers in de Nederlandse democratie (Delft: Eburon) (Advocates, process managers and participants. The history of interactive planning and the division of roles between government and citizens in Dutch democracy. Dissertation, Utrecht University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Arend, S. H. (2010) ‘A social movement of clerks. Interactive planning as a case of governance innovation in the Netherlands’. Paper presented at the First Berlin Forum on Innovation in Governance, 20 and 21 May 2010, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Arend, S. H. (2011) ‘The birth of the process manager. Patterns in the institutionalization of process management and their implications for participatory governance’. Paper presented at the Second Berlin Forum on Innovation in Governance, 19–20 May 2011, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Arend, S. H. and Behagel, J. H. (2011) ‘What participants do. A practice based approach to public participation in two policy fields’, Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voß, J-P. (2007) Designs on governance: Development of policy instruments and dynamics in governance (Dissertation, University of Twente).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voß, J-P. and Amelung, N. (2013) ‘The innovation of “citizen panels” as a method of public participation and the irony of anti-technocratic expertise’. Paper presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Science and Democracy Network, June 30–July 2, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voß, J-P. and Simons, A. (2014) ‘Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading’, Environmental Politics, 23, 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, H. (2012) ‘Dwellers on the threshold of practice: The interpretivism of Bevir and Rhodes’, Critical Policy Studies, 6(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2011) Communities of practice: A brief introduction, date accessed 14 May 2015, available at: http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/

Download references

Authors
  1. Sonja van der Arend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jelle Behagel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Germany

    Jan-Peter Voß (Professor of Sociology of Politics) (Professor of Sociology of Politics)

  2. University of Edinburgh, UK

    Richard Freeman (Professor of Social Science and Public Policy) (Professor of Social Science and Public Policy)

Copyright information

© 2016 Sonja van der Arend and Jelle Behagel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Arend, S., Behagel, J. (2016). Training Participants: Building a Community of Practice to Negotiate Sustainability. In: Voß, JP., Freeman, R. (eds) Knowing Governance. Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514509_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514509_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56476-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51450-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation