Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Introduction to the Population Ecology Approach

  • Chapter
The Organization Ecology of Interest Communities

Part of the book series: Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series ((IGAD))

Abstract

For a very long time, the essential traits of populations of organized interests — their density and diversity — were not considered to be especially interesting. Rather, they were assumed to be simple tallies resulting from mobilization events whereby institutions became active in lobbying or they, along with individual citizens, joined groups or associations that lobbied (Truman 1951; Olson 1965). This changed with the publication of Gray and Lowery’s The Population Ecology of Interest Representation in 1996 (also see: Lowery and Gray 1995). Inspired by core theories of population biology and organization ecology, they outlined a theory that both accounted for observed variations in the density and diversity of interest communities in the American states and suggested ways in which these emergent population characteristics shape organization survival and adaptation, the strategies and tactics interest organizations employ, and how influential these can be in political contexts. Since 1996, the organization ecology research program has engendered work on all of these topics and has been applied to a wide range of political systems, including the European Union, its member states, and international organizations. In short, we now know that the structure of interest communities matters a great deal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, Howard E., Catherine R. Zimmer, Udo H. Staber, and John J. Beggs. 1994. “Minimalism, Mutualism, and Maturity: The Evolution of the American Trade Association Population in the 20th Century.” In Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Eds.: Joel A. C. Baum and Jitendra V. Singh. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, Howard E. and Jeffrey Pfeffer. 1976. “Environments of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology, 2: 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Jennifer, Adam Newmark, Virginia Gray, and David Lowery. 2004. “Mayfies and Old Bulls: Demographic Volatility and Experience in State Interest Communities.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 4 (2): 140–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, Joost and David Lowery. 2011. “Short-Term Volatility in the EU Interest Community.” Journal of European Public Policy, 18 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, Joost, Caelesta Braun, Brendan Carroll, Adam Chalmers, Tine Destrooper, Simon Otjes, Anne Rasmussen, and David Lowery. 2015. “Interest Organizations across Economic Sectors: Explaining Interest Group Density in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (4): 462–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Jeffrey M., Frank Baumgartner, Marie Hojnacki, Beth L. Leech, and David C. Kimball. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosso, Christopher J. 2005. Environmental Inc. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, William P. 1990. “Organized Interests and Their Issue Niches: A Search for Pluralism in a Policy Domain.” Journal of Politics, 52 (2): 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, Paul and April Linton. 2002. “The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concerns.” Social Forces, 81: 380–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Glenn R. and Michael T. Hannan. 2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, Paul. 1978. Why Big Fierce Animals are Rare: An Ecologist’s Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisker, Helene Marie. 2013. “Density Dependence in Corporative Systems: Development of the Population of Danish Patient Groups (1901–2011).” Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2: 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1993. “State Interest Group System Diversity.” Political Research Quarterly, 46 (1): 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1995a. “Interest Representation and Democratic Gridlock.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20 (4): 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1995b. “The Demography of Interest Organization Communities: Institutions, Associations, and Membership Groups.” American Politics Quarterly, 23 (January): 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1996a. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1996b. “A Niche Theory of Interest Representation.” Journal of Politics, 59 (March): 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1997a. “Reconceptualizing PAC Formation: It’s Not a Collective Action Problem, and It May Be an Arms Race.” American Politics Quarterly, 25 (3): 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1997b. “Life in a Niche: Mortality Anxiety among Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly, 50 (March): 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia and David Lowery. 1998. “To Lobby Alone or in a Flock: Foraging Behavior among Organized Interests.” American Politics Quarterly, 26 (1): 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grier, Kevin B., Michael C. Munger, and Brian E. Roberts. 1994. “The Determinants of Industry Political Activity, 1978–1986.” The American Political Science Review, 88: 911–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, Darren and Grant Jordan. 2009. “Interpreting Environments: Interest Group Response to Population Ecology Pressures.” British Journal of Political Science, 39: 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, Darren and Grant Jordan. 2012a. The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, Darren and Grant Jordan. 2012b. “Estimating Group and Associational Populations.” In The Scale of Interest Organizations in Democratic Politics. Eds.: Darren Halpin and Grant Jordan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T. and Glenn R. Carroll. 1992. Dynamics of Organizational Populations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T. and John Freeman. 1989. Organization Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, J. P., Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson, and Robert H. Salisbury. 1993. The Hollow Core. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Kennith G., Laura Ann Wilson, and Gregory G. Brunk. 1991. “Social Complexity and Interest-Group Lobbying in the American States.” Journal of Politics, 53: 488–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. Evelyn. 1957. “Concluding Remarks.” Population Studies: Animal Ecology and Demography. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22: 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Grant, Frank R. Baumgartner, John D. McCarthy, Shaun Bevan, and Justin Green. 2012. “Tracking Interest Group Populations in the US and UK.” In The Scale of Interest Organizations in Democratic Politics. Eds.: Darren Halpin and Grant Jordan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, David. 1947. Darwin’s Finches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, David. 1954. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David. 2007. “Why Do Organized Interests Lobby? A Multi-Goal, Multi-Context Theory of Lobbying.” Polity, 39 (1): 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David. 2013. “Lobbying Influence: Meaning, Measurement, and Missing.” Interest Groups and Advocacy, 2 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David and Virginia Gray. 1993. “The Density of State Interest Group Systems.” Journal of Politics, 55 (1): 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David and Virginia Gray. 1995. “The Population Ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the Natural Regulation of Interest Group Numbers in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science, 39 (February): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David and Virginia Gray. 2001. “The Expression of Density Dependence in State Communities of Organized Interests.” American Politics Research, 29 (4): 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David and Virginia Gray. 2004. “A Neopluralist Perspective on Research on Organized Interests.” Political Research Quarterly, 57 (1): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, and James Monogan. 2008. “The Construction of Interest Communities: Distinguishing Bottom-Up and Top-Down Models.” Journal of Politics, 70 (4): 1160–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, Jennifer Anderson, and Adam J. Newmark. 2004. “Collective Action and the Mobilization of Institutions.” Journal of Politics, 66 (2): 684–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, Jennifer Benz, Mary Deason, Justin Kirkland, and Jennifer Sykes. 2009. “Understanding the Relationship between Health PACs and Health Lobbying in the American States.” Publius, 29 (Winter): 70–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, and John Cluverius. 2013. “Temporal Change in the Density of State Interest Communities.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, and Justin Kirkland. 2012. “Generalist Interest Organizations and Interest System Density: A Test of the Competitive Exclusion Hypothesis.” Social Science Quarterly, 93 (1): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, and Matthew Fellowes. 2005. “Sisyphus Meets the Borg: Economic Scale and the Inequalities in Interest Representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17 (1): 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, Robert H. and Edward O. Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, Anne, Joost Berkhout, and David Lowery. 2011. “The Density of the EU Interest System: A Test of the ESA Model.” British Journal of Political Science, 41 (1): 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nownes, Anthony J. 2004. “The Population Ecology of Interest Group Formation: Mobilizing for Gay and Lesbian Rights in the United States, 1950–98.” British Journal of Political Science, 34: 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nownes, Anthony J., and Daniel Lipinski. 2005. “The Population Ecology of Interest Group Death: Gay and Lesbian Rights Interest Groups in the United States, 1945–98.” British Journal of Political Science, 35: 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur, Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur, Jr., Jr. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real, Leslie and James H. Brown. 1991. Foundations of Modern Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, Kay L. and John T. Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. 1973. Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. David Lowery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Virginia Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Pennsylvania State University, USA

    David Lowery

  2. Australian National University, Australia

    Darren Halpin

  3. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, USA

    Virginia Gray

Copyright information

© 2015 David Lowery and Virginia Gray

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowery, D., Gray, V. (2015). An Introduction to the Population Ecology Approach. In: Lowery, D., Halpin, D., Gray, V. (eds) The Organization Ecology of Interest Communities. Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514318_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation