Abstract
The Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) is synonymous with the US Military and its transformation following the end of the Cold War, which would see operational platforms networked, flexible and for use in joint operations. The role of technology in general and information and communication technology (ICT) in particular meant that the deployable platforms and possibly even networks would transform the way that the US went to war. This chapter looks at those who stand beside the US military most often in combat: the European allies. The focus here is on how RMA, as it was understood and conveyed in the US, shaped the thinking and doctrine of European militaries. In Europe, the term RMA and even the concept are seen as belonging to the US, grand power and an overwhelming reliance on technological superiority to achieve military victory. European militaries have focused more on the notion of transformation, innovation and modernization to mean how any such benefits of RMA could be adapted or utilized in European military operations and in connection to European military operations with the US where compatibility is an important command factor. If RMA points the way towards military victory on the battlefield, why then have Europeans not taken the opportunity to follow their North American ally?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Anthony King, “The Origins of the RMA”, The Adelphi Papers, 38:318 (1998) pp.19–32.
Anthony King, The Combat Soldier: Infantry Tactics and Cohesion in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
Theo Farrell and Sten Rynning, “NATO’s Transformation Gaps: Transatlantic Differences and the War in Afghanistan”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 33:5 (2010) pp.673–99.
Caroline Wyatt, “Top General Warns Over “Hollowed Out” Armed Forces, BBC News (September 19, 2013), http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25440814
Michael Howard, “Military Science in an Age of Peace”, The RUSI Journal, 119:1 (1974) pp.3–11.
Nagl, John A. Nagl, Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015).
Eliot A. Cohen, “Change and Transformation in Military Affairs”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 27:3 (2004) pp.395–407.
Ina Wiesner, Importing the American Way of War? Network-Centric Warfare in the UK and Germany (Baden-Baden: Nomos Publishers: 2013). 15.
Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (New York: Cornell University Press, 1998).
Theo Farrell, “Introduction: Military Adaptation in War”, Chapter in Military Adaptation in Afghanistan, eds. Theo Farrell, Frans P.B. Osinga, and James A. Russell. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2013) pp.6–7.
Derrick J. Neal and Trevor Taylor, “Globalisation in the Defence Industry: An Exploration of the Paradigm for US and European Defence Firms and the Implications for Being Global Players.” Defence and Peace Economics, 12:4 (2001) p.344.
Peter J. Dombrowski, and Eugene Gholz, Buying Military Transformation: Technological Innovation and the Defense Industry (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006).
Yves Boyer, “The Consequences of U.S. and NATO Transformation for the European Union”, chapter in Daniel S Hamilton (ed.), Transatlantic Transformations: Equipping NATO for the 21st Century (Washington, D.C.: Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2004), pp.75–90.
See Jim Garramone, “Joint Vision 2020 Emphasizes Full-Spectrum Dominance”, American Forces Press Service, (June, 2 2010), http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45289; Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Vision Doctrine, (Washington DC: Department of Defence, 2010).
David J. Galbreath, “Western European Armed Forces and the Modernisation Agenda: Following or Falling Behind?” Defence Studies, 14:4 (2014) pp.394–413.
Simon Duke “The Future of EU-NATO Relations: A Case of Mutual Irrelevance Through Competition?” Journal of European Integration, 30 (2008) pp.27–43.
Theo Farrell, “Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006–2009”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 33:4 (2010) pp.567–94.
Sergio Catignani, “‘Getting COIN’ at the Tactical Level in Afghanistan: Reassessing Counter-Insurgency Adaptation in the British Army”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 35:4 (2010) pp.513–39.
Michael C. Williams, “Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics”, International Organization, 58:4 (2004) pp.633–65.
Theo Farrell, Sten Rynning, and Terry Terriff, Transforming Military Power since the Cold War: Britain, France, and the United States, 1991–2012 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Manabrata Guha, Reimagining War in the 21st Century: From Clausewitz to Network-Centric Warfare (London: Routledge: 2012).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 JDavid J. Galbreath
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galbreath, D.J. (2015). RMA, European Militaries and the Limits of Modernization. In: Collins, J., Futter, A. (eds) Reassessing the Revolution in Military Affairs. Initiatives in Strategic Studies: Issues and Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137513762_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137513762_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51375-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51376-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)