Abstract
How many things can you do with ordinary bricks (see Figure 2.1)? Well, let’s see: one can certainly try to build something, since this is what bricks are for. But what if you had only one brick? You could perhaps break it into little pieces and build a small house or a wall. Moreover, if you have little pieces of brick, you could draw with them on the pavement. And if the brick’s shape can be altered, then why not dig a small hole (if it is not there already) and put a candle in? If you bring it in contact with a stronger source of heat, you might be able to cook on a brick, or use it to warm up the bed during winter. Or, even better, why not use it as a flower pot? If you have plenty of tiny things, you can ‘hide’ them inside a carved brick or, if you get really creative, use the space inside to hold a napkin, or a knife, or even a gun. And, speaking of guns, you can also use the brick to hit someone, or break a window (not that you would of course, except for self-defence). Or use it for pest control — not a very nice image but still a potential use. For more constructive purposes, you can use the brick as a hammer, or stand on it and make yourself taller in family photos. And, if you can stand or lean on it, maybe books can, too; here you go, the brick as a bookshelf end piece! Or as a door stopper, or as a means to keep a car from sliding down a steep slope.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 467–481.
Costall, A. (2014). Canonical affordances and creative agency. In V. P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (pp. 45–57). London: Routledge.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects and the theory of affordances. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Heft, H. (2003). Affordances, dynamic experience, and the challenge of reification. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 149–180.
Jones, K. S. (2003). What is an affordance? Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 107–114.
Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Paris: Armand Colin.
Niveleau, C.-E. (2006). Le concept gibsonien d’affordance: Entre filiation, rupture et reconstruction conceptuelle. Intellectica, 43(1), 159–199.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Affordances and design. Retrieved 8 December 2014 from http://jnd.org/dn.mss/affordances_and.html
Runco, M. A. (1993). Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 16–22.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Vlad Petre Glăveanu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glăveanu, V.P. (2016). Affordance. In: Glăveanu, V.P., Tanggaard, L., Wegener, C. (eds) Creativity — A New Vocabulary. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137511805_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137511805_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-70246-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51180-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)