Skip to main content

Why Do We Need a New Vocabulary for Creativity?

  • Chapter
  • 1739 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

Abstract

Elsbach and Hargadon (2006) note that organisations eventually may begin to experience long-term underperformance and lack of creativity and innovation owing to intense workload pressures and stress. Constant speed makes you move forward; however, it may be in the wrong direction (towards failures, or even accidents) or it may be a short ride (stress and burnout). Lebbon and Hurley (2013) reported survey research that found 44 per cent of employees feel unmotivated to work and pointed to the fact that, although US employees work longer hours and take less vacation time than employees working in the European Union, productivity remains at similar levels to those in the European Union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baer, J. (2011). Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract and disappoint. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 21(1), 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, C. (2007). Management and creativity: From creative industries to creative management. London, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J. L. (1962). Fictions (A. Kerrigan, Trans.). New York, NY: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Fowler, Z. (2007). Unsettling boundaries in making a space for research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through ‘mindless’ work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17(4), 470–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2015). Business model innovation — The organizational dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York, NY: Longmans Green.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebbon, A. R., & Hurley, D. T. (2013). The effects of workplace leisure behavior on work-related behavior. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 6, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., Nakui, T., & Putman, V. L. (2006). Group brainstorming and teamwork: Some rules for the road to innovation. In L. L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 69–86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santanen, E. L. (2006). Opening the black box of creativity: Causal effects in creative solution generation. In L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 21–42). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebaek, P. S. (2013). Let’s have a cup of coffee! Coffee and coping communities at work. Symbolic Interaction, 36(4), 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Choi, H. S. (2006). Creativity and innovation in organizational teams. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waber, B. N., Olguin Olguin, D., Kim, T., & Pentland, A. (2010). Productivity through coffee breaks: Changing social networks by changing break structure. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1586375 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.1586375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B. (2015). From crisis to creativity: Towards a psychology of creating. Creativity: Theories — Research — Applications, 1(2), 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (2006). Faith, evidence, and action: Better guesses in an unknowable world. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1723–1736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Vlad Petre Glăveanu, Lene Tanggaard and Charlotte Wegener

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glăveanu, V.P., Tanggaard, L., Wegener, C. (2016). Why Do We Need a New Vocabulary for Creativity?. In: Glăveanu, V.P., Tanggaard, L., Wegener, C. (eds) Creativity — A New Vocabulary. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137511805_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics