Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Inter-American Human Rights System and US-Latin American Relations

  • Chapter
Cooperation and Hegemony in US-Latin American Relations

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

The Inter-American Human Rights System (the IAHRS) has been an integral part of the regional institutional landscape of the Americas since the mid-twentieth century. The regional human rights system has evolved in the light of the specific conditions prevailing in the region. A progressive development of regional human rights jurisprudence is reflected in the way the system struggled in its adolescent form during the early period of the Cold War to promote human rights in the region and how it judged the political calculations of transitional governments. Such developments received a boost with the return to democratic rule in the region and in this sense the direction of the Inter-American System as a whole became bound up with the maintenance and progress of political democracy. But, of course, democratic rule as such is not a guarantee for the respect of human rights, as the system has turned its attention to the challenge of ensuring the quality of democratic rule. The system has established the legal obligation under regional and international jurisprudence of states to protect the rights of citizens, and in the light of the failure to do so, the international obligation to hold states accountable. The IAHRS, therefore, has gradually evolved into a transnationalized regime as the system has opened up space for transnational political activity.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Agüero, Felipe and Jeffrey Stark (eds.). (1998). Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press/University of Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk, Alison. (2002). Globalization and Human Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk, Alison and Gershon Shafir, eds. (2004). People out of Place: Globalization, Human Rights and the Citizenship Gap. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buergenthal, Thomas and Dinah Shelton, eds. (1995). Protecting Human Rights in the Americas: Cases and Materials. Strasbourg: International Institute of Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Hedley. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carozza, Paolo G. (2003). “From Conquest to Constitutions: Retrieving a Latin American Tradition of the Idea of Human Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly, 25, pp. 281–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, Douglass. (1996). “A United States View of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” in Antonio A. Cançado Trindade, ed. The Modern World of Human Rights. San José: Inter-American Institute of Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerna, Cristina. (1992). “Structure and Functioning of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,” British Yearbook of International Law, 63, pp. 135–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew F. (2001). “The Quebec City ‘Democracy Summit,’” Washington Quarterly, 24:2, pp. 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew F. (2004). “The Making of the Inter-American Democratic Charter: A Case of Complex Multilateralism,” International Studies Perspectives, 5, pp. 92–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew F., and Thomas Legler. (2001). “The OAS Democratic Solidarity Paradigm: Questions of Collective and National Leadership,” Latin American Politics and Society, 43, pp. 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2005). “A Tale of Two Mesas: The OAS Defense of Democracy in Peru and Venezuela,” Global Governance, 11, pp. 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2006). Intervention without Intervening? The OAS Defense and Promotion of Democracy in the Americas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew F. and Jean-Philippe Thérien. (2004). “The Inter-American Regime of Citizenship: Bridging the Institutional Gap between Democracy and Human Rights,” Third World Quarterly, 25, pp. 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Jack. (1989). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Due Process of Law Foundation. (2007). Victims Unsilenced: The Inter-American Human Rights System and Transitional Justice in Latin America. Washington DC: Due Process of Law Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom, Par. (2010). Transnational Human Rights and Democratization: Argentina and the Inter-American Human Rights System (1976–2007). DPhil diss., University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom, Par, and Andrew Hurrell. (2010). “Why the Human Rights Regime in the Americas Matters,” in Mónica Serrano and Vesselin Popovski, eds. Human Rights Regimes in the Americas. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farer, Tom. (1997). “The Rise of the Inter-American Human Rights Regime: No Longer a Unicorn, Not Yet an Ox,” Human Rights Quarterly, 19, pp. 510–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farer, Tom (ed.). (1996). Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, Louise. (2005). “The Origins and Development of Regional Ideas in the Americas,” in Louise Fawcett and Mónica Serrano, eds. Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, Louise and Mónica Serrano, eds. (2005). Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, David. (1991). “Human Rights, The United States and the Organization of American States,” Human Rights Quarterly, 13, pp. 66–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck, Thomas. (1992). “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance,” The American Journal of International Law, 86, pp. 46–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1994). “Democracy as a Human Right,” Studies in Transnational Legal Policy, 73, pp. 73–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1994). “The Democratic Entitlement,” University of Richmond Law Review, 29, pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Bauer, Carlos. (1980–81). “The Observance of Human Rights and the Structure for Their Protection in the Western Hemisphere,” American University Law Review, 30, pp. 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, Mary Ann. (2003). “The Forgotten Crucible: The Latin American Influence on the Universal Rights Idea,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, Verónica. (1998). “The Interaction between the Political Actors of the OAS, the Commission and the Court,” in David J. Harris and Stephen Livingstone, eds. The Inter-American System of Human Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, Iain. (1990). Behind the Disappearances: Argentina’s Dirty War against Human Rights and the United Nations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, David. (1998). “Regional Protection of Human Rights: The Inter-American Achievement,” in David Harris and Stephen Livingstone, The Inter-American Human Rights System. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, Louis. (1989). “International Human Rights and Rights in the United States,” in Theodor Meron, ed. Human Rights in International Law: Legal and Policy Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew. (1998). “Security in Latin America,” International Affairs, 74, pp. 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2005). “Hegemony and Regional Governance in the Americas,” in Louise Fawcett and Monica Serrano, eds. Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (1980). Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Argentina. Washington DC: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, Michael, ed. (2005). American Exceptionalism and Human Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio and William C. Smith. (2005). “Transnational Civil Society Actors and Regional Governance in the Americas: Elite Projects and Collective Action from Below,” in Louise Fawcett and Monica Serrano, eds. Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stepan. (1996). “Toward Consolidated Democracies.” Journal of Democracy, 7, pp. 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Ellen L., and Kathryn Sikkink. (2000). “International Human Rights Law and Practice in Latin America,” International Organization, 54, pp. 633–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, Cecilia. (1990). “Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Reflections on a Joint Venture,” Human Rights Quarterly, 12, pp. 439–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, Heraldo. (1998). “The Right to Democracy in the Americas,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 40, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo A. (1973). Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1993). “On the State, Democratization, and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries,” World Development, 21, pp. 1355–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, David J. (1990). “The Inter-American System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights,” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 20, pp. 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, Francisco. (1993). “Human Rights: Global Culture and Social Fragmentation,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 12, pp. 205–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasqualucci, Jo M. (1999–2000). “Preliminary Objections before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Legitimate Issues and Illegitimate Tactics,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 40, pp. 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, Robert A. (2001). Exiting the Whirlpool: U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Latin America and the Caribbean. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peddicord, Jane D. (1984). “The American Convention on Human Rights: Potential Defect and Remedies.” Texas International Law Journal, 19, pp. 139–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoultz, Lars. (1981). Human Rights and United States Policy toward Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, Kathryn. (1996–97). “Reconceptualizing Sovereignty in the Americas: Historical Precursors and Current Practices,” Houston Journal of International Law, 19, pp. 705–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1997) “The Emergence, Evolution, and Effectiveness of the Latin American Human Rights Network,” in Elizabeth Jelin and Eric Hershberg, eds. Constructing Democracy: Human Rights, Citizenship and Society in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (2004). Mixed Signals: U.S. Human Rights Policy and Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbrodt, David, and Maria Luisa Bartolomei. (1990–1991). “Effectiveness of International Human Rights Pressures: The Case of Argentina, 1976–1983,” Minnesota Law Review, 75, pp. 1009–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Laurence. (1993). “The Alternative to ‘Liberal Democracy’: A Latin American Perspective,” in David Held, ed. Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, Fareed. (2003). The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Par Engstrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Juan Pablo Scarfi Andrew R. Tillman

Copyright information

© 2016 Par Engstrom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engstrom, P. (2016). The Inter-American Human Rights System and US-Latin American Relations. In: Scarfi, J.P., Tillman, A.R. (eds) Cooperation and Hegemony in US-Latin American Relations. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137510747_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation