Skip to main content

Resisting “Massive Elimination”: Foucault, Immigration, and the GIP

  • Chapter
Active Intolerance

Abstract

In 2014, mainstream debates about immigration—a frequent topic of news headlines in the United States—shifted to the subject of what was widely reported as “the new immigration crisis”: an influx of migrant children from Central America.1 Frequently described as a “surge,” this new topic of intense national debate occasioned the rehearsing of long-standing discourses surrounding border security, criminal invasion, and illegality. But national debate and discussion of what should be done about this “surge” also shed light on a central aspect of practices surrounding immigration rarely made visible in the media: immigrant detention. Popular culture in the United States is rife with representations of prisons—from mainstream news magazines to widely watched shows like OZ and, more recently, Orange Is the New Black. The prison seems a ubiquitous part of cultural production and consumption in the United States. But while, as Angela Davis states in Are Prisons Obsolete?, “the prison is one of the most important features of our image environment” (even as what actually happens within prisons remains largely invisible), spaces of immigrant detention are rarely represented.2 For this reason, it was all the more striking when, during national discussion about the “surge,” images of Central American children in detention centers made their way to mainstream news media outlets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Angela Y. Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete? (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2003), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Foucault, “Enquête sur les prisons: brisons les barreaux du silence” (1971), FDE1, no. 88, 1047, and Daniel Defert, “Sur quoi repose le système pénitentiaire” (1971), FGIP-AL, 129.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel Defert, “Quand l’information est une lutte” (1971), FGIP-AL, 73, and Foucault, “Préface” (1971), FDE1, no. 91, 1064.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In “Immigration ‘Reform’ and the Production of Migrant ‘Illegality,’” Nicholas De Genova provides a compelling account of how illegality in the context of migration has been produced throughout the history of US immigration policy. His genealogy is consistent with my claim here, following Foucault, that illegality itself is produced rather than managed by techniques of governmentality that regulate immigration in the United States. While De Genova also outlines the ways in which migrants from México are subjected to different treatment than migrants from other Central American countries, my analysis in this chapter explores how, in discourse surrounding the recent “surge” of child migrants, this distinction is being complicated. Nicholas De Genova, “Immigration ‘Reform’ and the Production of Migrant ‘Illegality,’” in Constructing Illegality in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 37–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Angela Y. Davis, The Angela Y. Davis Reader, ed. Joy James (Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 1998), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., 96; Joy James, Resisting State Violence: Radicalism, Gender, and Race in U.S. Culture (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brady Thomas Heiner, “Foucault and the Black Panthers,” City 11.3 (2007): 343–344.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michel Foucault and John K. Simon, “Michel Foucault on Attica: An Interview,” Social Justice 18.3 (Fall 1991): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foucault, “Je perçois l’intolérable” (1971), FDE1, 1071.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., 1072.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foucault, “Le grand enfermement” (1972), FDE1, no. 105, 1165.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joy James, Warfare in the American Homeland: Policing and Prison in a Penal Democracy (Durham: Duke University Press Books, 2007), 147 and 155.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. See especially Davis, The Angela Y. Davis Reader; Joy James, ed. States of Confinement: Policing, Detention, and Prisons (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, The Angela Y. Davis Reader, 83; Dean Spade, “The Only Way to End Racialized Gender Violence in Prisons is to End Prisons: A Response to Russell Robinson’s ‘Masculinity as Prison,’” California Law Review, December 18, 2012, http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/the-only-way-to-end-racialized-gender-violence-in-prisons-is-to-end-prisons-a-response-to-russell-robinson-s-masculinity-as-prison; Eric A. Stanley and Nat Smith, eds. Captive Genders: Trans Embodiment and the Prison Industrial Complex (Oakland: AK Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andrew Dilts has persuasively argued that there is a constitutive connection among imprisonment, punishment, and political membership in the United States. For a more thorough and historical analysis of this connection, and of the function of racism in the construction of US citizenship, see Andrew Dilts, Punishment and Inclusion: Race, Membership, and the Limits of American Liberalism (New York: Fordham University Press, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Foucault, “Prisons et révoltes dans les prisons” (1973), FDE1, no. 125, 1296.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Perry Zurn Andrew Dilts

Copyright information

© 2016 Natalie Cisneros

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cisneros, N. (2016). Resisting “Massive Elimination”: Foucault, Immigration, and the GIP. In: Zurn, P., Dilts, A. (eds) Active Intolerance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137510679_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137510679_17

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55286-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51067-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics