Advertisement

Research in information systems: a study of diversity and inter-disciplinary discourse in the AIS basket journals between 1995 and 2011

  • Edward W N Bernroider
  • Alan Pilkington
  • José-Rodrigo Córdoba
Chapter

Abstract

The paper investigates how Information Systems (IS) has emerged as the product of interdisciplinary discourses. The research aim in this study is to better understand diversity in IS research, and the extent to which the diversity of discourse expanded and contracted from 1995 to 2011. Methodologically, we apply a combined citations/co-citations analysis based on the eight Association for Information Systems basket journals and the 22 subject-field classification framework provided by the Association of Business Schools. Our findings suggest that IS is in a state of continuous interaction and competition with other disciplines. General Management was reduced from a dominant position as a reference discipline in IS at the expense of a growing variety of other discourses including Business Strategy, Marketing, and Ethics and Governance, among others. Over time, IS as a field moved from the periphery to a central position during its discursive formation. This supports the notion of IS as a fluid discipline dynamically embracing a diverse range of adjacent reference disciplines, while keeping a degree of continuing interaction with them. Understanding where IS is currently at allows us to better understand and propose fruitful avenues for its development in both academia and practice.

Keywords

citation analysis co-citation analysis information systems research reference discipline Abbott Foucault 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions: An essay on the division of expert labor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. AIS (2011). Senior Scholars’ Basket of Journals, Association for Information Systems, Retrieved January 2012 from http://home.aisnet.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=346.Google Scholar
  4. Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V. and Straub, D. (2010). A Response to the Design-Oriented Information Systems Research Memorandum, [Opinion Piece] European Journal of Information Systems, Advanced Online Publication (AOP) 20(1): 11–15.Google Scholar
  5. Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. (2002). Information Systems as a Reference Discipline, MIS Quarterly 26(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of Post Modernity, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Benbasat, I. and Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4): 211–218.Google Scholar
  8. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K. and Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 11(3): 369–386.Google Scholar
  9. Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. (2003). The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties, MIS Quarterly 27(2): 183–194.Google Scholar
  10. Biehl, M., Kim, H. and Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the Academic Business Disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis, Omega 34(4): 359–371.Google Scholar
  11. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  12. Bryant, A. (2008). The Future of Information Systems — 2014; Thinking informatically, European Journal of Information Systems 17(6): 695–698.Google Scholar
  13. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, W. and Hirschheim, R. (2004). A Paradigmatic and Methodological Examination of Information Systems Research from 1991 to 2001, Information Systems Journal 14(3): 197–235.Google Scholar
  15. Córdoba, J.-R., Pilkington, A. and Bernroider, E.W.N. (2012). Information Systems as a Discipline in the Making: Comparing EJIS and MISQ between 1995 and 2008, European Journal of Information Systems 21(5): 479–495.Google Scholar
  16. Culnan, M.J. (1986). The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A co-citation analysis, Management Science 32(2): 156–172.Google Scholar
  17. Daft, R.L. and Lewin, A.Y. (2008). Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution, Organization Science 19(1): 177–183.Google Scholar
  18. Davenport, T. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering work through information technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, F. and Bagozzi, R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology — 2014; A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35(8): 982–1003.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319–340.Google Scholar
  21. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3(1): 60–95.Google Scholar
  22. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4): 9–30.Google Scholar
  23. Dwivedi, Y. and Kuljis, J. (2008). Profile of IS Research Published in the European Journal of Information Systems, European Journal of Information Systems 17(6): 678–693.Google Scholar
  24. Earl, M. (1989). Management Strategies for Information Technology, London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.Google Scholar
  26. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1980). What is an Author? in P. Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought, London: Penguin, pp. 101–120.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The subject and power, in H.L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, Brighton: The Harvester Press, pp. 208–226.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1984). The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom, in P. Rabinow (ed.) Michel Foucault: Ethics subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, London: Penguin, pp. 281–301.Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, L. (1977). A Set of Measures of Centrality Based Upon Betweenness, Sociometry 40(1): 35–41.Google Scholar
  32. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  35. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Hammer, M. (1990). Re-Engineering Work: Don’t automate, obliterate, Harvard Business Review 68(4): 104–112.Google Scholar
  37. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A manifesto for business revolution, London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  38. Hanneman, R.A. and Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods, Riverside, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  39. Hansen, S., Lyytinen, K. and Markus, M.L. (2006). The Legacy of ‘Power and Politics’ in Disciplinary Discourse: A citation analysis, Paper Presented at the ICIS.Google Scholar
  40. Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H. and Rowlinson, M. (2010). Academic Journal Quality Guide —2014; Version 4, London: The Association of Business Schools.Google Scholar
  41. Hassan, N. (2006). Is Information Systems a Discipline? A Foucauldian and Toulminian analysis, Paper Presented at the 27th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Hassan, N.R. and Will, H.J. (2006). Synthesizing Diversity and Pluralism in Information Systems: Forging a unique disciplinary subject matter for the information systems field, Communications of the AIS 17(7): 152–180.Google Scholar
  43. Hirschheim, R., Iivari, J. and Klein, H.K. (2004). Towards a Distinctive Body of Knowledge for Information Systems Experts: Coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals, Information Systems Journal 14(4): 313–342.Google Scholar
  44. Hoffman, D.L. and Holbrook, M.B. (1993). The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the journal of consumer research, Journal of Consumer Research 19(4): 505–517.Google Scholar
  45. Introna, L.D. (2003). Disciplining Information Systems: Truth and its regimes, European Journal of Information Systems 12(3): 235–240.Google Scholar
  46. Kamada, T. and Kawai, S. (1989). An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs, Information Processing Letters 31(1): 7–15.Google Scholar
  47. Kim, Y., Savage, K.S., Howey, R.M. and Van Hoof, H.B. (2009). Academic Foundations for Hospitality and Tourism Research: A reexamination of citations, Tourism Management 30(5): 752–758.Google Scholar
  48. Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (2008). The Structure of the IS Discipline Reconsidered: Implications and reflections from a community of practice perspective, Information and Organization 18(4): 280–302.Google Scholar
  49. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 67–94.Google Scholar
  50. Leong, S.M. (1989). A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research, The Journal of Consumer Research 15(4): 492–497.Google Scholar
  51. Leydesdorff, L. and Zhou, P. (2005). Are the Contributions of China and Korea Upsetting the World System of Science? Scientometrics 63(3): 617–630.Google Scholar
  52. Lyytinen, K. and King, J. (2004). Nothing at the Center?: Academic legitimacy in the information systems field, Journal of the AIS 5(6): 220–246.Google Scholar
  53. Malone, T.W., Yates, J. and Benjamin, R.I. (1987). Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies, Communications of the ACM 30(6): 484–497.Google Scholar
  54. Marcus, M. (1983). Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation, Communications of the ACM 26(6): 430–444.Google Scholar
  55. McFarlan, F.W. (1984). Information Technology Changes the Way You Compete, Harvard Business Review 61(3): 98–103.Google Scholar
  56. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Mingers, J. and Walsham, G. (2010). Toward Ethical Information Systems: The contribution of discourse ethics, MIS Quarterly 34(4): 833–854.Google Scholar
  58. Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research 2(3): 192–221.Google Scholar
  59. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  60. Oesterle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H. and Sinz, E.J. (2010). Memorandum on Design-Oriented Information Systems Research, European Journal of Information Systems, Advanced Online Publication (AOP) 20(1): 7–10.Google Scholar
  61. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research 2(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
  62. Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D. (1991). Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations, Information Systems Research 2(2): 143–169.Google Scholar
  63. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. and Berry, L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing 49(4): 41–50.Google Scholar
  64. Paul, R.J. (2008). The Only Duty We Owe to History is to Rewrite It: Reflections on Bob Galliers’ article ‘a discipline for a stage?’, European Journal of Information Systems 17(6): 444–447.Google Scholar
  65. Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H., Vermunt, J. and Bijmolt, T. (1999). Importance and Similarity in the Evolving Citation Network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing 16(2): 113–127.Google Scholar
  66. Pilkington, A. and Chai, K.H. (2008). Research Themes, Concepts and Relationships: A study of international journal of service industry management (1990–2005), International Journal of Service Industry Management 19(1): 83–110.Google Scholar
  67. Pilkington, A. and Meredith, J. (2009). The Evolution of the Intellectual Structure of Operations Management — 2014; 1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis, Journal of Operations Management 27(3): 185–202.Google Scholar
  68. Pilkington, A. and Teichert, T. (2006). Management of Technology: Themes, concepts and relationships, Technovation 26(3): 288–299.Google Scholar
  69. Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free press.Google Scholar
  70. Porter, M. (1986). Competition in Global Industries, Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  71. Porter, M. and Millar, V.E. (1985). How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Review 63(4): 149–160.Google Scholar
  72. Ramos-Rodríguez, A.R. and Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000, Strategic Management Journal 25(10): 981–1004.Google Scholar
  73. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation, 4th edn. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Scott, J. (1994). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Sharplin, A.D. and Mabry, R.H. (1985). The Relative Importance of Journals Used in Management Research: An alternative ranking, Human Relations 38(2): 139–149.Google Scholar
  77. Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., Sakata, I. and Matsushima, K. (2011). Detecting Emerging Research Fronts in Regenerative Medicine by the Citation Network Analysis of Scientific Publications, Using Technological Intelligence for Strategic Decision Making in High Technology Environments 78(2): 274–282.Google Scholar
  78. Small, H.G. (1973). Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4): 28–31.Google Scholar
  79. Somers, M.J. (2010). Using the Theory of the Professions to Understand the IS Identity Crisis, European Journal of Information Systems 4(19): 382–388.Google Scholar
  80. Vessey, I., Ramesh, V. and Glass, R.L. (2002). Research in Information Systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2): 129–174.Google Scholar
  81. Wade, M., Biehl, M. and Kim, H. (2006). Information Systems is Not a Reference Discipline (And What We Can Do about It), Journal of the AIS 7(5): 247–269.Google Scholar
  82. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  83. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. White, H.D. (1990). Author Co-Citation Analysis: Overview and defense, in C.L. Borgman (ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 84–106.Google Scholar
  85. Wiegand, W.A. (1999). Tunnel Vision and Blind Spots: What the past tells us about the present; reflections on the twentieth-century history of American librarianship, The Library Quarterly 69(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  86. Yin, R. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and methods, 1st edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Information Technology (JIT) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward W N Bernroider
    • 1
  • Alan Pilkington
    • 2
  • José-Rodrigo Córdoba
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Information Management and ControlVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  2. 2.School of ManagementUniversity of LondonSurreyUK

Personalised recommendations