Is theory king?: questioning the theory fetish in information systems
This paper suggests that there is too much emphasis on the requirement for theory use and theory building in qualitative research published in our leading journals. We discuss six concerns that we have that relate to this high status of theory in such papers. We argue for what we refer to as ‘theory light’ papers where theory plays no significant part in the paper and the contribution lies elsewhere, for example, new arguments, facts, patterns or relationships. Some examples of theory light papers (and research) are provided from other disciplines and one exemplar information systems paper is studied in depth. We see these papers as equally worthy as those which demonstrate the applicability and predictive qualities of theory use as well as the potential of theory building. We propose a list of 10 questions that authors and reviewers might ask themselves when writing or reviewing such theory light papers. The more demanding role of the reader is also discussed along with the requirement for editorial teams to adapt. We suggest that the requirement for a contribution to theory would be replaced with the requirement that any journal paper has a high potential for stimulating research that will impact on information systems theory and/or practice.
Keywordstheory theory light qualitative research journals author editor reader
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- AIS (2014). Senior Scholars’ Basket of Journals [WWW document] http://aisnet.org/?page=SeniorScholarBasket&hhSearchTerms=%22basket%22 (accessed 2 March 2014).
- Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodology: New vistas for qualitative research, London: Sage.Google Scholar
- AMD (2014). AMD Founding Editorial Team Round Table Discussion [WWWdocument] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBCdL2TULGo&feature=share&list=PLU-uzN0D6ikzDJIsuzzNRJ4uV9dJcQxYy (accessed 2 March 2014).
- AOM (living). Academy of Management Discoveries [WWW document] http://aom.org/amd/ (accessed 2 March 2014).
- Avison, D. and Wood-Harper, A. (1990). Multiview: An exploration in information systems development, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Avital, M., Mathiassen, L. and Schultze, U. (2012). Call for Papers: European Journal of Information Systems Special Issue on Alternative Genres [WWW document] http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejis/e jis_cfp_alternative_genres.pdf (accessed 14 April 2013).
- Becker, H.S. (1996). The epistemology of qualitative research, in R. Jessor, A. Colby and R. A. Shweder (eds.) Ethnography and Human Development: Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
- Behar, R. (1996). The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Blake, W. (1982). Annotations to Sir Joshua Reynolds’s disclosures (Original work published 1808), in D. Erdman (ed.) The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R.D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S. and Vidgen, R. (2011). Call for Papers MISQ Special Issue on Sociomateriality of Information Systems and Organizing [WWW document] http://www.misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/CurrentCalls/SI_Sociomateriality.pdf (accessed 14 April 2013).
- Eco, U. (1984). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.Google Scholar
- Feyerabend, P.K. (1993). Against Method, New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (2009). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1968). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates, New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (2009). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Hughes, R. (2000). Shock of the New. Television Series: BBC/Time-Life.Google Scholar
- JAIS (2012). CFP JAIS Theory Development Workshop ICIS 2012 [WWW document] http://www.aisnet.org/ais_lists/public_lists_archive/2012-July/006947.html (accessed 14 November 2013).
- King, J.L. and Lyytinen, K. (2006). Information Systems: The state of the field, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lee, A.S., Myers, M., Paré, G. and Urquhart, C.U. (2000). Three perspectives: If Markus’ 1983 classic study, “power, politics, and MIS implementation,” were being reviewed today, in Proceedings of International Conference in Information Systems (Brisbane), Atlanta, GA: AIS.Google Scholar
- Lindblom, C.E. (1987). Alternatives to validity some thoughts suggested by Campbell’s guidelines, Science Communication 8(3): 509–520.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. (2000). Case studies, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 435–454.Google Scholar
- Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Straub, D. (2012). Editor’s comments: Does MIS have native theories? MIS Quarterly 36(2): iii–xii.Google Scholar
- Van Maanen, J. (ed.) (1995). An end to innocence: The ethnography of ethnography, in Representation in Ethnography, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weick, K.E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 516–531.Google Scholar
- Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Wynn, D. and Williams, C.K. (2012). Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems, MIS Quarterly 36(3): 787–810.Google Scholar