Abstract
Lee and Baskerville (2003) attempted to clarify the concept of generalization and classify it intofour types. In Tsang and Williams (2012) we objected to their account of generalization as well as their classification and offered repairs. Then we proposed a classification of induction, within which we distinguished five types of generalization. In their (2012) rejoinder, they argue that their classification is compatible with ours, claiming that theirs offers a ‘new language’. Insofar as we resist this ‘new language’ and insofar as they think that our position commits us to positivism and the rejection of interpretivism, they conclude both that our classification is more restrictive than theirs and also that we embrace ‘paradigmatic domination’. Lee and Baskerville’s classification of generalization is based on a distinction between theoretical and empirical statements. Accordingly we will first clarify the terms ‘theoretical statement’ and ‘empirical statement’. We note that they find nofault with our classification of induction, we re-state our main objections to their classification that remain unanswered and we show that their classification of generalizing is in fact incompatible with ours. We argue that their account of generalization retains fatal flaws that mean it should not be relied upon. We demonstrate that our classification is not committed to any paradigm and so we do not embrace ‘paradigmatic domination’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Campbell, D. and Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Carroll, L. (1872). Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There, Raleigh, NC: Hayes Barton Press.
Compeau, D., Marcolin, B., Kelley, H. and Higgins, C. (2012). Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects—A reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research, Information Systems Research 23(4): 1093–1109.
Copi, I.M. and Cohen, C. (1998). Introduction to Logic, 10th edn., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Farber, I., Mooney, B., Nowacki, M., Tan, Y.G. and Williams, J.N. (2011). Thinking Things Through: An introduction to analytical skills, 2nd edn., Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (1997). Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model, MIS Quarterly 21(4): 389–400.
Gensler, H. (2001). Introduction to Logic, London: Routledge.
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hurley, P. (2003). A Concise Introduction to Logic, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Ignatiadis, I. and Nandhakumar, J. (2006). The Impact of Enterprise Systems on Organizational Resilience, Journal of Information Technology 22(1): 36–43.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lax, E. (2004). The Mold in Dr. Florey’s Coat: The story of the penicillin miracle, New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Lee, A.S. (1991). Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research, Organization Science 2(4): 342–365.
Lee, A.S. and Baskerville, R.L. (2003). Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research, Information Systems Research 14(3): 221–243.
Lee, A.S. and Baskerville, R.L. (2012). Conceptualizing Generalizability: New contributions and a reply, MIS Quarterly 36(3): 749–761.
Margulis, L. and Schwartz, K.V. (1998). Five Kingdoms: An illustrated guide to the phyla of life on Earth, 3rd edn., New York: W. H. Freeman.
Masterman, M. (1970). The Nature of a Paradigm, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–89.
Moore, G.E. (1959). Philosophical Papers. London: Allen and Unwin.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Whitmore, G.A. (1988). Applied Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Phillips, D.C. (1987). Philosophy, Science, and Social Inquiry: Contemporary methodological controversies in social science and related applied fields of research, Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and Prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1949). The Theory of Probability: An inquiry into the logical and mathematical foundations of the calculus of probability, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Rheinwald R. (1993). An Epistemic Solution to Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction, Synthese 95(1): 55–76.
Rosenberg, A. (1993). Hume and the Philosophy of Science, in D. Norton (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Hume. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–89.
Russell, B. (1906). On the Nature of Truth, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7: 28–49.
Strawson, P.F. (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory, London: Methuen and Company.
Tsang, E.W.K. and Williams, J.N. (2012). Generalization and Induction: Misconceptions, clarifications, and a classification of induction, MIS Quarterly 36(3): 729–748.
Weinert, F. (ed.) (1995). Laws of Nature: Essays on the philosophical, scientific and historical dimensions, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical Investigations, 3rd edn., Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Journal of Information Technology (JIT)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, J.N., Tsang, E.W.K. (2015). Classifying generalization: paradigm war or abuse of terminology?. In: Willcocks, L.P., Sauer, C., Lacity, M.C. (eds) Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509857_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509857_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56112-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50985-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)