Advertisement

The Pieds-Noirs and French Political Life, 1962–2015

  • Eric Savarese

Abstract

In the period 1961–2, as Algeria was moving towards independence, almost a million Pieds-Noirs left the country for metropolitan France. The swiftness of this migration process1 led the authorities to take emergency measures for the integration of Algeria’s former French population.2 The imperative need for ‘metropolitanization’ of the Pieds-Noirs also brought with it new administrative classification procedures: until the legislation of 26 December 1961, ‘repatriation’ was defined under French law as ‘return to one’s country of origin’; subsequently it was interpreted as concerning ‘all French people forced, as the result of political events, to leave territories formerly under French sovereignty’.3 With the advent of independence, then, repatriation became a tool for dealing with the consequences of the colonial question. As a response to the political circumstances of the time, this legal reinterpretation of repatriation can be seen as something purely artificial. Nonetheless it had indisputable effects in practice: it enabled exact designation of those potentially eligible for help in moving to France, while the pied-noir category had no legal existence as such,4 being associated rather with the ‘colonial situation’ and Algerian independence.5

Keywords

Municipal Election French People Front National French Citizen Electoral Choice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Bruno Etienne, Les problèmes juridiques des minorités au Maghreb (Paris, 1965).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See Yann Scioldo-Zücher’s chapter in this volume; Yann Scioldo-Zücher, Devenir métropolitain: politiques d’intégration et parcours de rapatriés d’Algérie en métropole (1954–2005) (Paris, 2010).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Jean-Robert Henry, ‘Rapatriés, réfugiés, repliés: le poids des mots’, in Jean-Jacques Jordi and Emile Temime, eds, Marseille et le choc des décolonisations (Aix-en-Provence, 1996).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Georges Balandier, ‘La situation coloniale: approche théorique’, Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 11 (1951): 44–79.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Laure Blévis, ‘La citoyenneté française au miroir de la colonisation: étude des demandes de naturalisation des “sujets français” en Algérie coloniale’, Genèses, 53 (2003): 25–47.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    Under the provisions of the Evian Accords of 19 March 1962, they could remain French citizens or take Algerian nationality. Regarding the ‘Pieds-Verts’, see Hélène Bracco, L’autre face: Européens en Algérie indépendante (Paris, 1999).Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    ; Marie Muyl, ‘Le parti pied-noir: une opportunité européenne’, Pôle Sud, 24 (2006): 59–73. On the expellees’ party, see Frank Bösch’s chapter in this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 12.
    See also Claire Eldridge’s and Michèle Baussant’s chapters in this volume; Martine Barthelemy, Associations: un nouvel âge de la participation? (Paris, 2000).Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    See Jennifer Hunt, ‘The Impact of the 1962 Repatriates from Algeria and the French Labor Market’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45 (1992): 556–72;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anthony Rowley, ‘La réinsertion économique des rapatriés’, in Jean-Pierre Rioux, ed., La guerre d’Algérie et les Français (Paris, 1990), 348–52.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    Martin Evans, The Memory of Resistance: French Opposition to the Algerian War (1954–1962) (Oxford, 1997).Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    Maurice Halbwachs, Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire (Paris, 1994).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    Nancy Wood, Vectors of Memory: Legacies of Trauma in Postwar Europe (New York, 1999).Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    See Claude Liauzu and Gilles Manceron, eds, La colonisation, la loi et l’histoire (Paris, 2006);Google Scholar
  15. Romain Bertrand, Mémoires d’empire: la controverse autour du ‘fait colonial’ (Bellecombes-en-Bauges, 2006).Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Eric Savarese, L’ordre colonial et sa légitimation en France métropolitaine: oublier l’autre (Paris, 1998).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Jean-Jacques Jordi, De l’exode à l’exil: rapatriés et Pieds-Noirs en France. L’exemple marseillais, 1954–1992 (Paris, 1993).Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    In, for example, Perpignan as well as Béziers, Montpellier, Marignane, and Toulon. Cf. Eric Savarese, ed., L’Algérie dépassionnée : au-delà du tumulte des mémoires (Paris, 2008).Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    In this instance the term designates groups which, over and above the social qualities that define ‘category groups’, share a memory of suffering. See Cyril Lemieux and Jean-Paul Vilain, ‘La mobilisation des victimes d’accidents collectifs: vers la notion de groupe circonstanciel’, Politix, 11 (1998): 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 22.
    Eric Savarese, ‘Mobilisations politiques et posture victimaire chez les militants associatifs pieds-noirs’, Raisons Politiques, 30 (2008): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 23.
    Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, eds, The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
  22. 31.
    Michelle Baussant, Pieds-Noirs: mémoires d’exil (Paris, 2002).Google Scholar
  23. 35.
    Valérie Esclangon-Morin, Les rapatriés d’Afrique du Nord de 1956 à nos jours (Paris, 2007).Google Scholar
  24. 42.
    Nonna Mayer and Pascal Perrineau, eds, Le Front National à découvert (Paris, 1996).Google Scholar
  25. 54.
    Johann Michel, Gouverner les mémoires: les politiques mémorielles en France (Paris, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 55.
    Eric Savarese, Algérie : la guerre des mémoires (Paris, 2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eric Savarese 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Savarese

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations