Abstract
The United States is home to the world’s most vibrant and well-resourced environmental advocacy sector, but the country has been an inconsistent leader in global environmental diplomacy. Beginning in the 1970s, the US developed a reputation for global environmental leadership as it sought to internationalize its ambitious domestic environmental goals. For issues such as ozone depletion and whaling, the United States coordinated and cajoled others to take on commitments to support environmental aims. For other problems, foremost among them climate change, the United States has influenced global negotiations but has generally been regarded as a laggard from an environmental perspective. Some analysts interpret this as part of a larger secular trend away from global environmental leadership by the United States that began in the early 1990s. This chapter seeks to answer two main questions: (1) What explains the variation in US leadership on environmental issues? (2) Is the US increasingly moving away from leadership in global environmental diplomacy?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Elizabeth DeSombre, “Baptists and Bootleggers for the Environment: The Origins of United States Unilateral Sanctions,” The Journal of Environment and Development, Vol. 4, No. 1 (1995): 53–75.
Joshua Busby, “After Copenhagen: Climate Governance and the Road Ahead,” Council on Foreign Relations, 2010, http://www.cfr.org/publication/22726/after_copenhagen.html (accessed March 28, 2015); Robert Keohane and David G. Victor, “The Regime Complex for Climate Change,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 9, No. 1 (2011): 7–23.
Richard J. Smith, Negotiating Environment and Science: An Insider’s View of International Agreements, from Driftnets to the Space Station (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2009).
Tora Skodvin and Steinar Andresen, “Non-State Influence in the International Whaling Commission, 1970–1990,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 3, No. 4 (2003): 61–87.
Elizabeth R. DeSombre, “The United States and Global Environmental Politics: Domestic Sources of U.S. Unilateralism,” in Regina S. Axelrod, Stacy D. VanDeveer, and David Leonard Downie, eds., The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy, 3rd vol. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2011), 192–212.
Jutta Brunnée, “The United States and International Environmental Law: Living with an Elephant,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 15, No. 4 (2004): 617–649
Robert Falkner, “American Hegemony and the Global Environment,” International Studies Review, Vol. 7 (2005): 585–599
Maria Ivanova and Daniel C. Esty, “Reclaiming U.S. Leadership in Global Environmental Governance,” SAIS Review, Vol. 28, No. 2 (2008): 57–75
Michael E. Kraft, “U.S. Global Environmental Policy in the Post-Bush Era,” in Steven W. Hook and James M. Scott, eds., U.S. Foreign Policy Today American Renewal? (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2011): 217–235
Glen Sussman, “The USA and Global Environmental Policy: Domestic Constraints on Effective Leadership,” in Ronald B. Mitchell, ed., International Environmental Politics (London: SAGE Publications, 2008), 200–221.
R. Daniel Kelemen and David Vogel, “Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental Politics,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 43, No. 4 (2009): 427–456.
Josh Busby and Alexander Ochs, “Mars, Venus down to Earth: Understanding the Transatlantic Climate Divide,” in David Michel, ed., Beyond Kyoto: Meeting the Long-Term Challenge of Global Climate Change (Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University [SAIS], 2004), 35–76.
Joshua Busby and Jonathan Monten, “Without Heirs? Assessing the Decline of Establishment Internationalism in U.S. Foreign Policy,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 6, No. 3 (2008): 451–472.
Joshua Busby, “The Hardest Problem in the World: Leadership in the Climate Regime,” in Stefan Brem and Kendall Stiles, eds., The Dispensable Hegemon: Explaining Contemporary International Leadership and Cooperation (London: Routledge, 2008), 73–104.
Stephen Bocking, “Review of Negotiating Environment and Science: An Insider’s View of International Agreements, from Driftnets to the Space Station,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 10, No. 3 (2010): 154–155
Michael J. Glennon and Alison L. Stewart, “The United States: Taking Environmental Treaties Seriously,” in Edith Brown Weiss and Harold K. Jacobson, ed., Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), 173–213
Kathryn Harrison and Lisa Sundstrom, “The Comparative Politics of Climate Change,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 7, No. 4 (2007): 1–17.
Andrew Moravcsik, “The Paradox of US Human Rights Policy,” in Michael Ignatieff, ed., American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005), 187.
Robert A. Kagan, Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003).
Richard B. Stewart and Jonathan B. Wiener, Reconstructing Climate Policy (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 2003).
Harold K. Jacobson, “Climate Change: Unilateralism, Realism, and Two-Level Games,” in Stewart Patrick and Shepard Forman, eds., Multilateralism and US Foreign Policy (Boulder: Lynne Rienner 2002): 415–434.
Nigel Purvis, Personal Communication, The Brookings Institution, 2003. This is echoed in Phillip R. Tremble, International Law: United States Foreign Relations Law (New York: Foundation Press, 2002), 131.
Daniel Bodansky, “Transatlantic Environmental Relations: The Growing Rift between US and European Climate Change Policies,” in Mark Pollack and John Peterson, eds., Europe, America and Bush: Transatlantic Relations after 2000 (London: Routledge, 2003), 59–68.
Kal Raustiala, “Form and Substance in International Agreements,” The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 99, No. 3 (2005): 610–612.
David G. Victor and Lesley A. Coben, “A Herd Mentality in the Design of International Environmental Agreements?,” Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2005): 24–57.
James Gustave Speth and Peter Haas, Global Environmental Governance (New York: Island Press, 2006), 56.
Taryn Fransen et al., Mobilising International Climate Finance: Lessons from the Fast-Start Finance Period (London: Overseas Development Institute, November 2013), http://www.wri.org/publication/mobilising-international-climate-finance (accessed March 28, 2015).
G. John Ikenberry, “Is American Multilateralism in Decline?” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 1, no. 3 (2003): 533–550.
For a more extended discussions, see Josh Busby, “Climate Change Blues: Why the U.S. and Europe Just Can’t Get Along,” Current History, Vol. 102, No. 662 March (2003): 113–118
Joshua Busby, Moral Movements and Foreign Policy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Detlef Sprinz and Tapani Vaahtoranta, “The Interest-Based Explanation of Environmental Policy,” International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 1 (1994): 77–105.
Todd Sandler, Global Collective Action (Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003)
Robert Kagan, “Power and Weakness,” Policy Review, Vol. 113 (2002): 3–28, http://www.hoover.org/research/power-and-weakness (accessed March 28, 2015).
G. John Ikenberry, “American Grand Strategy in the Age of Terror,” Survival, Vol. 43, No. 4 (2001): 19–34
G. John Ikenberry, “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 7, No. 1 (2009): 71–87.
Sheila Jasanoff, “American Exceptionalism and the Political Acknowledgment of Risk,” Daedalus, Vol. 119, No. 4 (1990): 61–81.
Steven Kull, “Public Attitudes toward Multilateralism,” in Stewart Patrick and Shepard Forman, eds., Multilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002), 99–120
Benjamin I. Page and Marshall M. Bouton, The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want from Our Leaders but Don’t Get, American Politics and Political Economy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).
Josh Busby and Jon Monten, “Republican Elites and Foreign Policy Attitudes,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 127, No. 1 (2012): 105–142
Bethany Albertson and Joshua Busby, “Hearts or minds? Identifying persuasive messages on climate change,” Research & Politics, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2015): 1–9.
Walter Russell Mead, Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World, 1st vol. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf: Distributed by Random House, 2001)
Walter Russell Mead, “The Jacksonian Tradition,” The National Interest, No. 58 (1999): 5–29.
James Q. Wilson, American Government: Institutions and Policies (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 1980).
Anthony Downs, “Up and Down with Ecology: The ‘Issue Attention’ Cycle,” The Public Interest, Vol. 28 (Summer 1972): 38–50.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 G. John Ikenberry, Wang Jisi, and Zhu Feng
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Busby, J.W. (2015). A Green Giant? Inconsistency and American Environmental Diplomacy. In: Ikenberry, G.J., Jisi, W., Feng, Z. (eds) America, China, and the Struggle for World Order. Asia Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508317_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508317_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55327-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50831-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)