Skip to main content
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

From 2003 to 2005, the discovery of Iran’s nuclear activities that had not been declared to the IAEA opened an important negotiating phase between Iranian representatives, keen on avoiding a referral to the United Nations Security Council, and European delegates who formed a “negotiating troika” to defuse tensions and reach a diplomatic solution. These negotiations pivoted around three crucial conditions: the suspension of all enrichment activities; the disclosure of all past nuclear activities carried out by Iran; and the discussion of proposals from both sides to reach a long-term political agreement. Although some deals were achieved in the short term, the lack of agreement on the nature and modalities of the implementation of these measures inevitably led to the failure of the negotiations. A significant opportunity to reach a diplomatic solution, which became more even more complex after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s election as president of the Islamic Republic in June 2005, was thus lost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mousavian, Seyed Hossein, Iran-Europe Relations: Challenges and Opportunities, London: Routledge, 2008, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dombey, Daniel, “EU Worries That Iran Expects Too Much Too Soon from Nuclear Arms Agreement,” Financial Times, February 4, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison, Frances, “Iran Issues Nuclear Warning to US,” BBC, May 1, 2005, <http://news.bbc.co.uU2/hi/middle_east/4503915.stm>.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hafezi, Parisa, “Iran to Pursue Nuclear Fuel Cycle — Rafsanjani,” Reuters, April 29, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talt, Rober, “Iran’s Nuclear Talks in Doubt,” The Guardian, July 7’, 2005, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jul/07/iran.roberttait>;

    Google Scholar 

  6. El Baradei, Mohamed, The Age of Deception: Nuclear Diplomacy in Treacherous Times, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011, p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kerr, Paul, “Questions Surround Iran’s Nuclear Program,” Arms Control Association, March 2006, <http://www.armscontrol.org/print/2001>.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Linzer, Dafna, “Strong Leads and Dead Ends in Nuclear Case against Iran,” The Washington Post, February 8, 2006, <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/07/AR2006020702126.html>.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, Jeffrey, “Iranian Nuclear Test Shaft,” Arms Control Wonk, February 12, 2006, <http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/970/iranian-nuclear-test-shaft>.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, Jeffrey, “Iran’s Underground UF4 Plant,” Arms Control Wonk, February 19, 2006, <http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/979/irans-underground-uf4-plant>.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borger, Julian, “US Iran Intelligence ‘Is Incorrect’,” The Guardian, February 22, 2007, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/feb/22/iran.usa>.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Michele Gaietta

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaietta, M. (2015). Diplomacy at Work (2003–05). In: The Trajectory of Iran’s Nuclear Program. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508256_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics