Abstract
From 2003 to 2005, the discovery of Iran’s nuclear activities that had not been declared to the IAEA opened an important negotiating phase between Iranian representatives, keen on avoiding a referral to the United Nations Security Council, and European delegates who formed a “negotiating troika” to defuse tensions and reach a diplomatic solution. These negotiations pivoted around three crucial conditions: the suspension of all enrichment activities; the disclosure of all past nuclear activities carried out by Iran; and the discussion of proposals from both sides to reach a long-term political agreement. Although some deals were achieved in the short term, the lack of agreement on the nature and modalities of the implementation of these measures inevitably led to the failure of the negotiations. A significant opportunity to reach a diplomatic solution, which became more even more complex after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s election as president of the Islamic Republic in June 2005, was thus lost.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mousavian, Seyed Hossein, Iran-Europe Relations: Challenges and Opportunities, London: Routledge, 2008, p. 149.
Dombey, Daniel, “EU Worries That Iran Expects Too Much Too Soon from Nuclear Arms Agreement,” Financial Times, February 4, 2005.
Harrison, Frances, “Iran Issues Nuclear Warning to US,” BBC, May 1, 2005, <http://news.bbc.co.uU2/hi/middle_east/4503915.stm>.
Hafezi, Parisa, “Iran to Pursue Nuclear Fuel Cycle — Rafsanjani,” Reuters, April 29, 2005.
Talt, Rober, “Iran’s Nuclear Talks in Doubt,” The Guardian, July 7’, 2005, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jul/07/iran.roberttait>;
El Baradei, Mohamed, The Age of Deception: Nuclear Diplomacy in Treacherous Times, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011, p. 144.
Kerr, Paul, “Questions Surround Iran’s Nuclear Program,” Arms Control Association, March 2006, <http://www.armscontrol.org/print/2001>.
Linzer, Dafna, “Strong Leads and Dead Ends in Nuclear Case against Iran,” The Washington Post, February 8, 2006, <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/07/AR2006020702126.html>.
Lewis, Jeffrey, “Iranian Nuclear Test Shaft,” Arms Control Wonk, February 12, 2006, <http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/970/iranian-nuclear-test-shaft>.
Lewis, Jeffrey, “Iran’s Underground UF4 Plant,” Arms Control Wonk, February 19, 2006, <http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/979/irans-underground-uf4-plant>.
Borger, Julian, “US Iran Intelligence ‘Is Incorrect’,” The Guardian, February 22, 2007, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/feb/22/iran.usa>.
Copyright information
© 2015 Michele Gaietta
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gaietta, M. (2015). Diplomacy at Work (2003–05). In: The Trajectory of Iran’s Nuclear Program. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508256_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508256_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57841-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50825-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)