Skip to main content

The Physical Environment for Communication in 21st-Century Work Spaces: A Research Model

  • Chapter
The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research

Part of the book series: Communicating in Professions and Organizations ((PSPOD))

Abstract

The physical environment of an office, laboratory or studio shapes, reflects and sometimes subverts the kinds of communication required to get work done there. To examine that hypothesis, my research into workspace design pulls together insights from material culture studies as well as rhetorical theory. Given a long-standing interest in professional communication, I am focusing on a productive intersection of these disciplines to look at on-the-ground communication practices in specific 21st-century work spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (n.d.). Background of the Connecticut General Building. Mimeograph, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, G. (2010). Envisioning collaboration: group verbal-visual composing in a system of creativity, Baywood Publications: Amityville, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorley, S. & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: how to set the stage for creative collaboration, John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engine Room (n.d.). http://www.portlandengineroom.com/.

  • Filler, M. (2014). The road to the zombie office, The New York Review, 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Pantheon Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gensler. (2013). Gensler design forecast. Accessed on 14 August 2014 from http://www.gensler.com/doc/gensler-design-forecast.

  • Gensler. (2014). Gensler design forecast. Accessed on 17 August 2014 from http://www.gensler.com/doc/design-forecast-2014?q=design%20forecast%202014.

  • Henry, J. (2000). Writing workplace cultures: an archaeology of professional writing, Southern Illinois University Press: Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman Miller (2009). Research summary/2009: Why and how we meet. Accessed on 14 August 2014 from http://www.HermanMiller.com/content/HermanMiller/NorthAmerica/en_us/home/research/research-summaries/whyand-how-we-meet. html.

  • Herman Miller (2013). Research summary/2013: The private-to-open spectrum. Accessed on 14 August 2014 from http://www.HermanMiller.com/research/research-summaries/the-private-to-open-spectrum.html.

  • Herman Miller (2014a). Co-working, swarming, and the agile workplace. Accessed on 17 August 2014 from http://www.HermanMiller.com/research/researchsummaries/co-working-swarming-and-the-agile-workplace.html.

  • Herman Miller (2014b). 21st century work habitats: a conversation with Gensler. Accessed on 14 August 2014 from http://www.HermanMiller.com/research/research-summaries/21st-century-work-habitats.html.

  • Herman Miller (2014c). Insight: what it takes to collaborate. Accessed on 14 August 2014 from http://www.HermanMiller.com/research/topics/all-topics/what-it-takes-to-collaborate.html.

  • Johnson Banks (2014). Identity and brand, not-for-profit, Acumen. Accessed on 14 August 2014 from http://JohnsonBanks.co.uk/identity-and-branding/not-for-profit/acumen/.

  • K logix Corporation (n.d.). http://www.Klogixsecurity.com/.

  • Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things, Polity: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2010). Stuff, Polity: Cambridge UK and Malden Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentagram (n.d.). http://www.pentagram.com/work/#/all/all/newest/.

  • Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: an activity theory analysis. Written Communication 14(4): 504–554. Accessed on 3 November 2014 from http://www.public.iastate.edu/~DrRussel/at%26genre/at%26genre.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saval, N. (2014). Cubed: a secret history of the workplace, Doubleday: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, G. (2006). Writing the economy: activity, genre and technology in the world of banking, Equinox: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: co-working as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26 (4): 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (2013). Working alone, together, The New York Times, 5 May, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. & Orlikowski, W. (2002). Genre systems: structuring interaction through communicative norms. The Journal of Business Communication 39 (1): 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Deborah C. Andrews

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andrews, D.C. (2016). The Physical Environment for Communication in 21st-Century Work Spaces: A Research Model. In: Alessi, G.M., Jacobs, G. (eds) The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50767-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50768-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics