Skip to main content

Standardizing the Language of Corporate Internal Investigative Reports: Linguistic Perspectives on Professional Writing Practices

  • Chapter
The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research

Part of the book series: Communicating in Professions and Organizations ((PSPOD))

  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

Multinational corporations conduct internal investigations when unresolved questions regarding employee behaviour require attention. The company’s internal investigator identifies the employees involved, then compiles and documents testimonies, descriptions and contextual information that may eventually confirm or disprove allegations. The purpose of the investigation is to allow the company authorities to take decisions about which action to take and policies to form regarding that particular incidence. The problems investigated mostly concern matters of company security — involving employee behaviour in breach of company policy. Accusations can range from: employee misconduct, fraud, harassment, code violations, alleged threats and physical injury, to bribery, blackmail or general issues of non-compliance that can result in employee dismissal. When an internal complaint or suspected rule violation by an employee is detected and reported, a regional company investigator, typically known as the Business Practices Officer (BPO), interviews the parties involved, and sends findings in an investigative report to the offices of the company’s Head of International Security (HIS). This office, along with the offices of International Legal Compliance and Corporate Security, make a final decision on what actions to take or policies to create. The report, normally undergoes final editing by the company at this stage, and is filed for internal reference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, P.V. (2011). Technical Communication: A Reader-centred Approach. Boston: Thomson/Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. (2008). Genre Analysis, ESP and Professional Practice. English for Specific Purposes 27. 2: 161–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V.K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in Professional Communication. Discourse & Communication 4. 1: 32–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, M. (2001). Just the Facts: Investigative Report Writing. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boveé, C.L., Thill, J.V., & Schatzman, B.E. (2004). Business Communication Essentials. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeze, R. (2013). Traversing Legal Narratives. Narratives in Academic and Professional Genres. Bern: Peter Lang, 344–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, P., & Castle, R. (2013). Modern Legal Drafting: A Guide to Using Clearer Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engberg, J., & Arinas Pellón, I. (2011). The Secret to Legal Foretelling: Generic and Inter-generic Aspects of Vagueness in Contracts, Patents and Regulations. International Journal of English Studies 11. 1: 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, L. (2008). Determining Discourse-based Moves in Professional Reports. In. Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub., 117–131.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, B.A. (2013). Legal Writing in Plain English: A Text with Exercises. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzone, G., & Gotti, M. (2011). Realisations of Intertextuality, Interdiscursivity and Hybridisation in the Discourses of Professionals. In G. Garzone and M. Gotti (Eds), Tension and Change in Domain-specific Genres. Discourse, Communication and the Enterprise. Genres and Trends. Peter Lang, Bern, 91–110.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garzone, G., & Degano, C. (2012). Voices in Arbitration Awards:Polyphony and Language Reports. Discourse and Practice in International Commercial Arbitration Issues, Challenges and Prospects. Surrey: Ashgate, 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guffey, M.E. (2003). Business Communication Process and Product. Mason: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Christopher. Word Meaning and Legal Interpretation: An Introductory Guide. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, M.E. (2010). Professional Investigator’s Manual. Alexandria, VA: ASIS International (Kindle file).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matoesian, G.M. (2001). Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzi, D. (2007). Reporting Verbs: A Tool for a Polyphonic Reading of Judgements. Studien Zur Rechtskommunikation. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmedemann, D.A. & Kunz, C.L. (1999). Synthesis: Legal Reading, Reasoning, and Writing. Gaithersburg: Aspen Law & Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy, R.W. (1998). The Language of Confession, Interrogation and Deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. (2009). “‘Just Spoke to’: The Types and Directionality of Intertextuality in Professional Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 32. 1 (2013): 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Glen Michael Alessi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alessi, G.M. (2016). Standardizing the Language of Corporate Internal Investigative Reports: Linguistic Perspectives on Professional Writing Practices. In: Alessi, G.M., Jacobs, G. (eds) The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_12

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50767-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50768-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics