Skip to main content

Some Implications of Oakeshott’s Thought for Contemporary Korean Society and Politics

  • Chapter
Michael Oakeshott’s Cold War Liberalism
  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

Michael Oakeshott, who was once defined as a parochial ideologue, affiliated not only with the British conservative tradition but also with Margaret Thatcher, has begun to attract the attention of scholars around the world as a thinker who escapes that category. Oakeshott’s pluralist epistemology and related conception of modern individuality, his constructive theory of historical knowledge, his radical critique of rationalism in modern politics, his emphasis on the religious dimension of political and moral life, his views on the practice of politics, and his philosophy of education are today being reassessed. As a result, Oakeshott is increasingly recognized as one of the great political philosophers of the twentieth century, even as the greatest political philosopher the English-speaking world has produced since Burke or J. S. Mill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Michael Oakeshott, “The Concept of A Philosophy of Politics,” in Michael Oakeshott, Religion, Politics and the Moral Life, ed. Timothy Fuller (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 119–37; Michael Oakeshott, “Political Philosophy,” in Oakeshott, Religion, Politics and the Moral Life, 138–55.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael Oakeshott, “Rationalism in Politics,” in Michael Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Oakeshott, On Human Conduct (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), vii.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Oakeshott, Hobbes on Civil Association (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1992), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Most critics of Oakeshott’s concept of political philosophy as unpractical are, I think, wrong in their judgment on the true intent of Oakeshott’s critique of the conventional concepts of political philosophy. Bhikhu Parekh, “Review Article: The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 9, no. 4 (1979): 481–506;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benjamin Barber, The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988), 152–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oakeshott, Politics of Faith and Politics of Scepticism, ed. Timothy Fuller (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), 68–89.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. H. Greenleaf, Oakeshott’s Philosophical Politics (London: Longmans, 1966);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wendell J. Coats, Jr., “Michael Oakeshott as Liberal Theor+ist,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 18 (1985), 773–87;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. and Paul Franco, The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Boucher, “Oakeshott, Freedom and Republicanism,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 7 (2005), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dana Villa, “Oakeshott and the Cold War Critique of Political Rationalism,” in The Cambridge Companion to Oakeshott, ed. Efraim Podoksik (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2012, 319–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Terry Nardin

Copyright information

© 2015 The Asan Institute for Policy Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, B.H. (2015). Some Implications of Oakeshott’s Thought for Contemporary Korean Society and Politics. In: Nardin, T. (eds) Michael Oakeshott’s Cold War Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507020_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics