Abstract
Michael Oakeshott, who was once defined as a parochial ideologue, affiliated not only with the British conservative tradition but also with Margaret Thatcher, has begun to attract the attention of scholars around the world as a thinker who escapes that category. Oakeshott’s pluralist epistemology and related conception of modern individuality, his constructive theory of historical knowledge, his radical critique of rationalism in modern politics, his emphasis on the religious dimension of political and moral life, his views on the practice of politics, and his philosophy of education are today being reassessed. As a result, Oakeshott is increasingly recognized as one of the great political philosophers of the twentieth century, even as the greatest political philosopher the English-speaking world has produced since Burke or J. S. Mill.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michael Oakeshott, “The Concept of A Philosophy of Politics,” in Michael Oakeshott, Religion, Politics and the Moral Life, ed. Timothy Fuller (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 119–37; Michael Oakeshott, “Political Philosophy,” in Oakeshott, Religion, Politics and the Moral Life, 138–55.
Michael Oakeshott, “Rationalism in Politics,” in Michael Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991), 5.
Michael Oakeshott, On Human Conduct (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), vii.
Michael Oakeshott, Hobbes on Civil Association (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1992), 4.
Most critics of Oakeshott’s concept of political philosophy as unpractical are, I think, wrong in their judgment on the true intent of Oakeshott’s critique of the conventional concepts of political philosophy. Bhikhu Parekh, “Review Article: The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 9, no. 4 (1979): 481–506;
Benjamin Barber, The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988), 152–76.
Oakeshott, Politics of Faith and Politics of Scepticism, ed. Timothy Fuller (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), 68–89.
W. H. Greenleaf, Oakeshott’s Philosophical Politics (London: Longmans, 1966);
Wendell J. Coats, Jr., “Michael Oakeshott as Liberal Theor+ist,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 18 (1985), 773–87;
and Paul Franco, The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).
David Boucher, “Oakeshott, Freedom and Republicanism,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 7 (2005), 81–96.
Dana Villa, “Oakeshott and the Cold War Critique of Political Rationalism,” in The Cambridge Companion to Oakeshott, ed. Efraim Podoksik (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2012, 319–44.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 The Asan Institute for Policy Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, B.H. (2015). Some Implications of Oakeshott’s Thought for Contemporary Korean Society and Politics. In: Nardin, T. (eds) Michael Oakeshott’s Cold War Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507020_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507020_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50634-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50702-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)