Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Asan-Palgrave Macmillan Series ((APMS))

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

Climate change is a global problem that requires international cooperation. Unfortunately, developed and developing countries are divided in their commitment to tackling the issue. These different national interests undermine efforts to establish an environmentally effective global regime. With the expiration of the Kyoto Protocol, there is space for MIKTA to facilitate a new agreement—one that will be “applicable to all parties”. By playing the crucial bridging role between developed and developing states, middle power countries can help create a collaborative agenda that focuses on different national circumstances to establish a more nation-driven approach to effectively mitigating the effects of climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Pamela S. Chasek, David L. Downie, and Janet Welsh Brown, Global Environmental Politics (Boulder: Westview Press, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Keohane and David Victor, “The Regime Complex for Climate Change,” Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 1 (2011): 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pamela Chasek, “Creating Space for Consensus: High-Level Globe-trotting in to the Bali Climate Change Conference,” International Negotiation 16 (2011): 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. On the different approaches to climate change of the EU and US, see: Miranda Schreurs and Yves Tiberghien, “Multi-Level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation,” Global Environmental Politics 7, No. 4, (2007): 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andrew F. Cooper, Richard A. Higgott, and Kim Richard Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order (Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonathan H. Ping, Middle Power Statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia and Asia-Pacific (Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gareth Evans, “Middle Power Diplomacy,” Inaugural Edgardo Boeninger Memorial Lecture by Professor the Hon. Gareth Evans, Chancellor of The Australian National University, President Emeritus of the International Crisis Group, and former Foreign Minister of Australia, Chile Pacific Foundation, Santiago, June 29, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For detailed discussion on the role of middle power and the G20, see: Mo Jongryn, ed., Middle Powers and G20 Governance (Seoul and New York: The Asan Institute for Policy Studies and Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marc Frings, Indonesia’s Role in International Climate Policy: Financial Incentives to Preserve the Rainforest an Effective Model? Kas International Reports (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter Lawrence, “Australian Climate Policy and the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP). From Howard to Rudd: Continuity or Change? International Environmental Agreements 9, no. 3 (2009): 281 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. John Ikenberry and Mo Jongryn, The Rise of Korean Leadership: Emerging Powers and Liberal International Order (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Scott Snyder, ed., Global Korea: South Korea’s Contributions to Global Security (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marc Frings, Indonesia’s Role in International Climate Policy: Financial Incentives to Preserve the Rainforest an Effective Model? Kas International Reports (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lawrence Rothenberg, Political Economy of Climate Change, in Responding to Climate Change: Global Experiences and Korean Perspectives, eds Chin Hee Hahn, Sang-Hyop Lee, Kyoung-Soo Yoon (Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd. and Korea Development Institute & East-West Center, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Mo Jongryn and The Asan Institute for Policy Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siwon, P. (2015). Middle Power Cooperation for Climate Change and Green Growth. In: Jongryn, M. (eds) MIKTA, Middle Powers, and New Dynamics of Global Governance: The G20’s Evolving Agenda. Asan-Palgrave Macmillan Series. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506467_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics