Skip to main content
  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this book has been to show how literature might help to challenge the reductive ‘us and them’ binaries often present in the framing of identity and difference after 9/11. Such binaries are perpetuated through the global media, but are also patently apparent in the lexicons of the Bush administration, al-Qaeda and — as I suggested in the Introduction — a number of prominent Western novelists, including Ian McEwan. As I have attempted to make clear from the opening pages, this is by no means to equivocate (morally or otherwise) between the three groups. Rather it is to underscore, through the very extent of their non-equivalence, just how ingrained such binaries have become in the language with which people from even the most vastly differing ideological backgrounds make sense of the contemporary world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Judith Butler, Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? (London: Verso, 2009), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Teju Cole, Open City (London: Faber and Faber, 2011), p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Daniel O’Gorman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Gorman, D. (2015). Conclusion. In: Fictions of the War on Terror. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506184_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics