Skip to main content
  • 1690 Accesses

Abstract

Our outlook conveys where we direct our focus as we navigate into the future as adopters, and perhaps invent the future as creators. If what we ought to do is to create, how might we apply the connections made between creativity and ethics in the Origins chapter? This chapter explores our ethical worries and hopes regarding creativity. Worry dreads a negative outcome, whereas hope strives for a better outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ambrose, D. (2014). Transformational imperative for the field: An interview with David Henry Feldman. Roeper Review, 36(4), 207–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, A. (1993). Theater of the oppressed. New York, NY: Theatre Communications Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramen, L. (2009a, July 31). A history of western eating utensils, from the scandalous fork to the incredible spork. Smithsonian.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramen, L. (2009b, August 5). The history of chopsticks. Smithsonian.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua, A. S. (1978). Dimensions of moral creativity: Paradigms, principles, and ideals. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (2004). The common good. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, W., Solomon, B., Greenspan, D., & Gardner, H. (2004). Making good: How young people cope with moral dilemmas at work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001). Good work: When excellence and ethics meet. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haste, H., & Abrahams, S. (2008). Morality, culture and the dialogic self: Taking cultural pluralism seriously. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havel, V. (1997). The art of the impossible: Politics as morality in practice. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izusa, K., & Adolphs, R. (2011). The brain’s rose-colored glasses. Nature Neuroscience, 14(11), 1355–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. (1955). Social systems as a defense against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, & R. E. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis (pp. 478–498). London, UK: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (2000). The nothing that is: A natural history of zero. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzendorf, R. G., & Bradbury, J. L. (1983). Better liars have better imaginations. Psychological Reports, 52, 634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (2000). Revolution in time: Clocks and the making of the modern world. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. The Economic Journal, 97(387), 666–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009). What role does commitment play among writers with different levels of creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010a). Creativity in school. In K. S. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. K. Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 319–360). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010b, August). Creativity in the commons. Presentation at the Second Institute on Civic Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010c). Returning to the Good Work Project’s roots: Can creative work be humane? In H. Gardner (Ed.), Good work: Theory and practice (pp. 127–145). Cambridge, MA: Good Work Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2014a). An ethics of possibility. In S. Moran, D. H. Cropley, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity (pp. 281–298). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2014b). The crossroads of creativity and ethics. In S. Moran, D. H. Cropley, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity (pp. 1–22). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Peterson, D. R., MacDougall, A. E., Zeni, T. A., & Moran, S. (2014). The ethical demands made on leaders of creative efforts. In S. Moran, D. H. Cropley, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity (pp. 265–278). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., & Devenport, L. D. (2010). Creativity and ethics: The relationship of creative and ethical problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., & Mrkva, K. (2014). The development of moral imagination. In S. Moran, D. H. Cropley, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity (pp. 25–46). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962/1983). Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangee, K., Schmidt, J. B., & Wallman, J. P. (2013). Clinging to slim chances: The dynamics of anticipating regret when developing new products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 980–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2012). Foresight, insight, oversight, and hindsight in scientific discovery: How sighted were Galileo’s telescopic sightings? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(3), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 69(2), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J. (2006). In the bubble: Designing in a complex world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315(5811), 515–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, A. (2007). Creative problem-solving in ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Seana Moran

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moran, S. (2016). Outlook. In: Ethical Ripples of Creativity and Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505545_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics