Skip to main content

The Muse Writes Back: Lyric Poetry and Female Poetic Identity

  • Chapter
Genre Trajectories

Abstract

This chapter examines the genre of lyric poetry, focusing on one particular aspect of that genre — the convention of the muse. The love lyric directed at the beloved muse has a lengthy tradition, from Sappho and Catullus to Petrarch, through Shakespeare, Sidney and Donne, and into the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. The muse, as the conventional addressee of the lyric, plays a crucial role in enabling the poem to come into being: she is the absent presence towards whom the poet’s words are directed. But the gendered positioning of the muse-poet relationship, reiterated throughout literary history, means that the lyric muse has proved a particularly problematic concept for women poets. Due to the concept of the muse, women have been consistently associated with the passive, inspiring role rather than that of active creator — that role is preserved for men. This, along with other social and cultural factors, made it particularly difficult for women poets to claim the role of poet for themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, M. H. (1993) A Glossary of Literary Terms (Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1997) (ca. 335 BCE) Poetics, trans. S. H. Butcher (Mineola, New York: Dover Thrift Editions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blain, V. (1999) ‘Sexual Politics of the (Victorian) Closet; or, No Sex Please–We’re Poets’, in I. Armstrong and V. Blain (eds), Women’s Poetry: Late Romantic to Late Victorian, Gender and Genre, 1830–1890 (Basingstoke: Macmillan), pp. 135–163.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, S. (2009) Lyric (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2000) ‘The Victorian Poetess’, in J. Bristow (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Poetry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 180–202.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. (1981) The Pursuit of Signs (London and Oxon: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Custance, O. (1902) Rainbows (London: John Lane).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeShazer, M. (1986) Inspiring Women: Reimagining the Muse (New York: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donne, J. (1963) ‘To His Mistress Going to Bed’ (1654)’, in J. Hayward (ed.), John Donne: Selected Poetry (Middlesex: Penguin), pp. 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, E. (1998) We Are Michael Field (Bath: Absolute Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Michael (pseud. Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper) (1997) ‘A Girl’ (1893)’, in R. K. R. Thornton and M. Thain (eds), Poetry of the 1890s (London: Penguin), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, N. (1957) Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. M. and S. Gubar (2001) ‘The Madwoman in the Attic (1979)’, in J. Rivkin and M. Ryan (eds), Literary Theory: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 596–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, R. (1952) The White Goddess: A Historical Grammar of Poetic Myth, 3rd edn (London: Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesiod (1988) Theogony and Works and Days (ca. 700 BC), trans. M. L. West (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. R. (1982) The Idea of Lyric: Lyric Modes in Ancient and Modern Poetry (California: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestenbaum, W. (1989) Double Talk: The Erotics of Male Literary Collaboration (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, G. A. (1999) Refiguring the Muse (New York: Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mermin, D. (1986) ‘The Damsel, the Knight, and the Victorian Woman Poet’, Critical Inquiry, 13 (1), 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (2014) ‘Thoughts on Poetry and Its Varieties’ (1833)’, in J. Bristow (ed.), 2014 (rpt; originally published 1983), The Victorian Poet: Poetics and Persona (Oxford and New York: Routledge), pp. 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J. (2000) Paradise Lost (1667) (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naden, C. (1997) ‘Love’s Mirror’ (1894)’, in R. K. R. Thornton and M. Thain (eds), Poetry of the 1890s (London: Penguin), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit. E. (1997) ‘The Goose-Girl’ (1898),’ in R. K. R. Thornton and M. Thain (eds), Poetry of the 1890s (London: Penguin), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (2005) Phaedrus (ca. 370 BCE), trans. C. Rowe (London: Penguin). ‘Poetry in Petticoats’, Scots Observer, 1890, 8 March, pp. 438–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, A. (2004) ‘Epistle to Dr. Artbuthnot’ (1735), in D. Fairer and C. Gerrard (eds), Eighteenth Century Poetry: An Annotated Anthology, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, Y. (1999) Victorian Sappho (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prose, F. (2003) The Lives of the Muses: Nine Women and the Artists They Inspired (New York: Harper Perennial).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1993) ‘When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision’ (1971),’ in B. Charlesworth Gelpi and A. Gelpi (eds), Adrienne Rich’s Poetry and Prose (New York: Norton), pp. 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertston, E. S. (1883) English Poetesses: A Series of Critical Biographies with Illustrative Extracts (London: Cassell and Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. M. F. (1997)‘Love Without Wings’ (1891)’, in R. K. R. Thornton and M. Thain (eds), Poetry of the 1890s (London: Penguin), pp. 180–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti, C. (2008) Selected Poems (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (2005) ‘Sonnet 130’ (1609)’, in K. Duncan -Jones (ed.), Shakespeare’s Sonnets (London: Arden Shakespeare, Thomson Learning), p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinfield, A. (1994) The Wilde Century: Effeminacy, Oscar Wilde, and the Queer Moment (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spenser, E. (1995) The Works of Edmund Spenser (Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, B. (1998) [1897] Dracula (Plymouth: Broadview Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayler, I. (1990) Holy Ghosts: The Male Muses of Emily and Charlotte Brontë (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thain, M. (1998) ‘Love’s Mirror: Constance Naden and Reflections on a Feminist Poetics’, English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920, 41 (1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thain, M. (1999) ‘Michael Field, May Kendall, May Probyn and A. Mary F. Robinson: Late Victorian Responses to a Problem of Poetic Identity’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thain, M. (2007) ‘Poetry’, in G. Marshall (ed.), Cambridge Companion to the Fin de Siècle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 223–240.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thorton, R. K. R. and M. Thain (eds) (1997) Poetry of the 1890s (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, W. (2003) Poetry’s Touch: On Lyric Address (London: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellek, R. (1970) Discriminations: Further Concepts of Criticism (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (2009) The Poetry Toolkit: The Essential Guide to Studying Poetry (London: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, V. (2000) A Room of One’s Own (1929) (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wordsworth, W. and S. T. Coleridge (2013) Lyrical Ballads 1798 and 1802 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Sarah Parker

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, S. (2015). The Muse Writes Back: Lyric Poetry and Female Poetic Identity. In: Dowd, G., Rulyova, N. (eds) Genre Trajectories. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505484_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics