Skip to main content

Challenging Anthropocentrism in Education: Posthumanist Intersectionality and Eating Animals as Gastro-Aesthetic Pedagogy

  • Chapter
The Educational Significance of Human and Non-Human Animal Interactions

Abstract

While numerous academic disciplines in the social sciences and humanities study human–animal interactions, education remains behind the times, so to speak. What is obvious is overt anthropocentrism—the view that human beings are the center and most important species on Earth—that accounts for why we in education remain, to a large extent, unaffected by the increasing popularity of inquiry into human–animal relationships. It is not a stretch to suggest that most educationists believe that education concerns human beings only or that the experiences of human beings are somehow unrelated to, or should take precedence over, the experiences of non-human beings. Of course, there are educational scholars who challenge anthropocentrism by incorporating non-humans into their analysis of schooling for social and ecological justice (DeLeon, 2011; Dolby, 2012; Kahn, 2008, 2011; Martin, 2011; Martusewicz, Edmundson, & Lupinacci, 2015; Pedersen, 2009; Rice, 2013; Rowe, 2009, 2011, 2012). These notable exceptions, however, remain on the periphery of critical education scholarship that aims to interrogate and change systems of oppression, privilege, and domination. This chapter argues that animal oppression is deeply intertwined with various forms of human oppression and should therefore occupy some role in critical educational theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, C. (2000). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory (10th Anniversary ed.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., & Donovan, J. (Eds.). (1995). Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. (2007). Book review of C. Patterson (2002), Eternal Treblinka: Our treatment of animals and the holocaust. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 5(2), 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (2008, February 18). USDA orders largest meat recall in U.S. history. Washington Post. Retrieved February 28, 2008 from http://www.washington-post.com/wpdyn/content/article/2008/02/17/AR2008021701530.html

  • Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize thepolitical (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, P. (2001). The animal question: Why nonhuman animals deserve human rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (2005). Intersectionality and identity politics: Learning from violence against women of color. In W. Kolmar & F. Bartkowski (Eds.), Feminist theory: A reader (pp. 533–542). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, E. (2010). ‘The recipe for love’? Continuities and changes in the sexual politics of meat. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 8(4), 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1964). On the origin of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2004). A tale of two holocausts. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal, 2(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckha, M. (2008). Intersectionality and posthumanist visions of equality. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 23(2), 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckha, M. (2010). The subhuman as a cultural agent of violence. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 3(3), 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckha, M. (2012). Toward a postcolonial posthumanist feminist theory: Centralizing race and culture in feminist work on nonhuman animals. Hypatia: Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 27, 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously: Mental life and moral status. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, A. (2010). The lure of the animal: The theoretical question of the nonhuman animal. Critical Education, 1(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, A. (2011). What’s that nonhuman doing on your lunch tray? Disciplinary spaces, school cafeterias and possibilities for resistance. In S. Robert & M. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), School food politics: The complex ecology of hunger and feeding in schools around the world (pp. 183–200). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolby, N. (2012). Rethinking multicultural education for the next generation: The new empathy and social justice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, D. (2003). Species as a social construction: Is species morally relevant? Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 1(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, E. (2002). A left-handed blow: Writing the history of animals. In N. Rothfels (Ed.), Representinganimals (pp. 3–18). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSUS (Humane Society of the United States). (2008). Rampant animal cruelty at Californiaslaughterplant. Retrieved April 30, 2013 from http://www.humanesociety.org/news/news/2008/01/undercover_investigation_013008.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. (2008). Towards ecopedagogy: Weaving a broad-based pedagogy of liberation for animals, nature, and the oppressed peoples of the earth. In A. Darder, R. Torres, & M. Baltadano (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed.) (pp. 522–540). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. (2011). Towards an animal standpoint: Vegan education and the epistemology of ignorance. In E. Malewski & N. Jaramillo (Eds.), Epistemologies of ignorance in education (pp. 53–70). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsmeyer, C. (1999). Making sense of taste: Food and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, G. (2004). Dining on Fido: Death, identity, and the aesthetic dilemma of eating animals. In E. McKenna & A. Light (Eds.), Animal pragmatism: Rethinking human-nonhuman relationships (pp. 228–247). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (2008). Food for co-educational thought. Presidential essay. In B. Stengel (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2007 (pp. 1–14). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lioi, A. (2008). An end to cosmic loneliness: Alice Walker’s essays as abolitionist enchantment. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 15(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R (2011). Education reconfigured: Culture, encounter, and change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martusewicz, R., Edmundson, J., Lupinacci, J. (2015). Ecojustice education: Toward diverse, democratic, and sustainable communities (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. (2002). Eternal Treblinka: Our treatment of animals and the holocaust. New York: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H. (2009). Animals in schools: Processes and strategies in human-animal education. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1984). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T, & Singer, P. (Eds.). (1989). Animal rights and human obligations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. (2013). Three educational problems: The case of eating animals. Journal of Thought, 28(2), 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (2006). Animal rights andhuman morality (3rd ed.). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, B. (2009). Animal rights and human growth: Intellectual courage and extending the moral community. Philosophical Studies in Education, 40, 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, B. (2011). Understanding animals-becoming-meat: Embracing a disturbing education. Critical Education, 2(7), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, B. (2012). Food, habit, and the consumption of animals as educational encounter. In C. Ruitenberg (Ed.), Philosophy of education2012 (pp. 210–218). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, B, & Rocha, S. (in press). School lunch is not a meal: Posthuman eating as folk phenomenology. Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran-Foer, J. (2009). Eatinganimals. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (1999). Somaesthetics: A disciplinary proposal. The journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57(3), 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1990). Animalliberation (2nd ed.). New York: The New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, M. (1997). The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery. New York: Mirror Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twine, R. (2010). Intersectional disgust? Animals and (eco)feminism. Feminism & Psychology, 20(3), 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (1988). Am I blue? In Living in the world (pp. 3–8). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (1988). Am I blue? In Living in the world (pp. 3–8). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Suzanne Rice A. G. Rud

Copyright information

© 2016 Bradley Rowe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowe, B. (2016). Challenging Anthropocentrism in Education: Posthumanist Intersectionality and Eating Animals as Gastro-Aesthetic Pedagogy. In: Rice, S., Rud, A.G. (eds) The Educational Significance of Human and Non-Human Animal Interactions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505255_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505255_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57512-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50525-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics