Skip to main content

(Un)Learning Anthropocentrism: An EcoJustice Framework for Teaching to Resist Human-Supremacy in Schools

  • Chapter
The Educational Significance of Human and Non-Human Animal Interactions

Abstract

In the Living Planet Report 2014 by the WWF (formally known as the World Wildlife Fund), researchers introduce a new index that considers “10,380 populations of 3,038 species of mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian and fish from around the globe” (p. 136). This report indicates that since 1970 the planet has experienced a 52% loss in species (WWF, 2014). Further, this index states that the world’s freshwater species have dropped by 76% in that same time span. These statistics come to us amid an ongoing debate among scientists as to whether the designation of our current time period, the Holocene (meaning entirely recent), is outdated, and whether Anthropocene (combining human with the new) might be a more accurate identifier. Despite the continued contestations, scientists agree that “human-kind has caused mass extinctions of plant and animal species, polluted the oceans and altered the atmosphere, among other lasting impacts” (Stromberg, 2013, para. 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPPC. (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/syr/en/contents.html

  • IPPC. (2013). IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2013. Retrieved January 9, 2014, from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate: http://www.climat-echange2013.org/images/report/WG 1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf

  • Jensen, D. (2009). Forget shorter showers: Why personal change does not equal polit-ical change. Orion Magazine, July/August. Retrieved from http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/4801/

  • Lupinacci, J. (2011). Educating for commons sense: Learning that is situational, local, and supportive of living systems. PowerPlay: A Journal of Educational Justice, 3(1), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupinacci, J. (2013). Eco-ethical environmental education: Critically and ethically examining our existence as humans. In A. Kulnieks, D. R. Longboat, & K. Young (Eds.), Contemporary studies in environmental and indigenous pedagogies: A curricula of stories and place. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupinacci, J., & Happel, A. (2015). Recognize, resist, and reconstitute: An ecojustice response to neoliberalism. In M. Abendroth (Ed.), Understanding neoliberal rule in higher education schools: Educational fronts for local andglobal justice (Volume 2) (pp. 269–287). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, S., & Edmundson, J. (2013). Special issue: Eco-democratic reforms in education. Educational Studies, 49(5), 381–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martusewicz, R., & Edmundson, J. (2005). Social foundations as pedagogies of responsibility and eco-ethical commitment. In D. W. Butin (Ed.), Teaching social foundations of education: Contexts, theories, and issues (pp. 71–92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martusewicz, R., Edmundson, J., & Lupinacci, J. (2011). EcoJustice education: Toward diverse, democratic, and sustainable communities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martusewicz, R., Edmundson, J., & Lupinacci, J. (2015). EcoJustice education: Toward diverse, democratic, and sustainable communities (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocella II, A. (2004). Understanding the ALF: From critical analysis to critical pedagogy. In A. Nocella II & S. Best (Eds.), Terrorists or freedom fighter? Reflections on the liberation of animals (pp. 195–201). NewYork: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocella, A. II, & Best, S. (2012). Terrorists of freedom fighters?: Reflections on the liberation of animals. New York: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocella, A. II, Sorensen, J., Socha, K., & Matsuoka, A. (Eds.). (2014). Defining critical animal studies: An intersectional social justice approach for liberation. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg, J. (2013). What is the anthropocene and are we in it? Efforts to label the human epoch have ignited a scientific debate between geologist and environmental-ists. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved on January 25, 2014 from http://www.smith-sonianmag.com/science-nature/what-is-the-anthropocene-and-are-we-in-it-164801414/

  • Twine, R. (2012). Revealing the ‘animal-industrial complex’ — A concept & method for critical animal studies?. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 10(1), 12–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Children’s Fund. (2004). The state of the world’s children 2005. UNICEF. Retrieved on January 25, 2014 from http://www.unicef.org/sowc05/ english/sowc05.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Children’s Fund. (2009). The state of the world’s children: Special edition. UNICEF. Retrieved on January 25, 2014 from http://www.unicef.org/rightsite/sowc/pdfs/SOWC_Spec%20Ed_CRC_Main%20Report_EN_ 090409.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, K. R., & Gruenewald, D. A. (2004). Special issue: Ecojustice and education (Vol. 36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF. (2014). Living planet report 2014: Species and spaces, people and places. Retrieved October 3, 2014, from WWF Network: http://wwfpanda.org/about_ our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report/

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Suzanne Rice A. G. Rud

Copyright information

© 2016 John Lupinacci and Alison Happel-Parkins

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lupinacci, J., Happel-Parkins, A. (2016). (Un)Learning Anthropocentrism: An EcoJustice Framework for Teaching to Resist Human-Supremacy in Schools. In: Rice, S., Rud, A.G. (eds) The Educational Significance of Human and Non-Human Animal Interactions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505255_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137505255_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57512-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50525-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics