Abstract
The main objective of this chapter is to analyze Vietnam’s difficult position in the growing competition between China and the US. The biggest concern of Vietnam, like other Southeast Asian countries, is to be caught between big power struggles. Based on historical lessons it has learned from the Vietnam War, as it could successfully engage both the Soviet Union and China and managed to secure support from both of them notwithstanding serious problems between them, the chapter concludes that Vietnam should not take sides in the big power competition but maintain a balance between them while strengthening itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Douglas Pike, Vietnam and the Soviet Union: Anatomy of an Alliance (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987), p. 61.
Robert Miller, The United States and Vietnam 1787–1941 (Washington: National Defense University Press, 1990).
Marvin E. Gettleman et al., Vietnam and America — A Documented History (New York: Grove Press Inc., 1985), p. 50.
Dwight D. Eisenhower’s letter to Ngo Dinh Diem on October 23, 1954, in Marvin E. Gettleman et al., Vietnam and America: A Documented History, p. 117.
Hien Nhi, “To bring the bilateral trade between Vietnam and China to US$60 billion in 2015”, available at http://www.congan.com.vn/?mod=detnews&catid=707&id=493796 accessed April 24, 2013.
Brantly Womack, China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Mark E. Manyin, “US—Vietnam Relations in 2011: Current Issues and Implication for US Policy”, Congressional Research Service, May 18, 2012, p. 22.
Frederick Z. Brown, “Vietnam and America: Parameters of the Possible”, Current History, April 2010, p. 166.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, “America’s Pacific Century”, Remarks delivered at the East-West Center, Honolulu, November 10, 2011.
Henry Kissinger, “The Future of US-Chinese Relations”, Foreign Affairs, Mar/Apr 2012, Vol. 91, No. 2, p. 6.
Office of the Secretary of Defense, “Military and Security Developments involving the People’s Republic of China 2011”, A Report to Congress Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act to Fiscal Year 2000, Washington DC, 2012.
Ronald O’Rourke, “China Naval Modernization: Implication for US Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress”, Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, July 31, 2012, p. 15.
Carlyle Thayer, “China’s Naval Modernization and US Rebalancing: Implication for Stability in the South China Sea”, Paper presented to the Fourth International Conference on the South China Sea co-organized by the Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam and the Vietnam Lawyers’ Association, Ho Chi Minh City November 18–21, 2012.
Hillary Clinton, “Remarks at the National Convention Center Hanoi, Vietnam”, July 23, 2010, available at http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/07/145095.htm accessed August 13, 2010.
Michael Green, “US turns its gaze to the Pacific”, The World Today Magazine, February–March 2012, p. 31.
Sanchita Basu Das and Hnin Wint Nyunt Hman, “The Next Decade in ASEAN-USA Economic Relations”, ISEAS Perspective, #13, Singapore, March 11, 2013.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Pham Quang Minh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minh, P.Q. (2015). In the Crossfire: Vietnam and Great Powers in the Emerging East Asian Security Architecture. In: Togo, K., Naidu, G.V.C. (eds) Building Confidence in East Asia: Maritime Conflicts, Interdependence and Asian Identity Thinking. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137504654_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137504654_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50580-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50465-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)