Abstract
The femme fatale of film noir has attracted considerable scholarly attention over the decades since 1955, when Raymond Borde and Étienne Chaumeton defined the figure as a ‘new type of woman’ (1996, p. 22), one who is as fatal for herself as she is to those who become entangled in her schemes. To date, interest in the fatale figure has, for the most part, centred on two cinematic cycles. Firstly, the classic film noir era of the 1940s and 1950s. Feminists, film scholars, and psychoanalytic theorists are well known for their innovative critiques of the dark lady of this period, exploring her elemental characteristics and establishing the figure as representative of deep-seated patriarchal anxieties stemming from cultural shifts in gender dynamics taking place in society at the time (see Mary Ann Doane, 1991; Janey Place, 1998; and E. Ann Kaplan, 1998 for example).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Paul Schrader’s ‘Notes on Film Noir’ (1996, pp. 53–64) for a more comprehensive breakdown of the stylistic elements of classic noir.
Bill Drake’s A Rage in Harlem (1991)
and Hoodlum (1997), both period-gangster thrillers, could also be argued to function to this effect.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Samantha Lindop
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lindop, S. (2015). Introduction: Beyond the Limits of Noir Scholarship. In: Postfeminism and the Fatale Figure in Neo-Noir Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503596_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503596_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56940-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50359-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)