Skip to main content
  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

The conclusion sums up the main findings and identifies various types of camps according to their primary and secondary functions and lists the functional equivalents of camps. While acknowledging that camps constitute a very widespread phenomenon, it also underlines that they are always the exception, that is, heterotopias or ‘outsides inside.’ In their benign forms they may constitute ‘humanitarian spaces,’ but they often also have much more sinister functions. The chapter also points to the need for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Hyndman (2003) ‘Preventive, Palliative, or Punitive? Safe Spaces in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Somalia, and Sri Lanka,’ Journal of Refugee Studies, 16:2, 167–185;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Landgren (1995) ‘Safety Zones and International Protection: A Dark Grey Area,’ International Journal of Refugee Law, 7:3, 436–458,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P.S. Subedi (1999) ‘The Legal Competence of the International Community to Create “Safe Havens” in “Zones of Turmoil”,’ Journal of Refugee Studies, 12:1, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Acuto (ed.) (2014) Negotiating Relief. The Politics of Humanitarian Space (London: Hurst) (n. 260).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Agamben (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Foucault (2002) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (London: Routledge), xix; idem and J. Miskowiec (1986) ‘Of Other Spaces,’ Diacritics, 16:1 (n. 14).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.W. Cox (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,’ in R. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press), 204–254, quote from 207.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Bjørn Møller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Møller, B. (2015). Conclusion. In: Refugees, Prisoners and Camps: A Functional Analysis of the Phenomenon of Encampment. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137502797_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics