Abstract
In many ways the government of Michelle Bachelet (2006–2010) represented an ideal scenario, both for far-reaching social reforms and for integrating gender equality as a guiding principle within these reforms. Bachelet headed the fourth consecutive center-Left government after the return to democracy (the second under socialist leadership), and her room for maneuver was comparatively greater than that of previous administrations: politically—owing to the elimination of some important authoritarian enclaves; and fiscally—as a result of the boom in commodity prices particularly for copper, Chile’s major export earner. Furthermore, Bachelet was not only the first female president of the country, but had campaigned and won based on an electoral platform in which both social protection and gender equality figured prominently. One of the declared goals of her government was to articulate a rights-based social protection system that would guarantee equal opportunities from the cradle to old age. How far did this ambitious agenda translate into substantive policy change? And to what extent were gender inequalities taken into account and addressed?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arenas de Mesa, A. (2000). “Cobertura previsional en Chile: Lecciones y desafíos del sistema de pensiones administrado por el sector privado.” Serie Financiamiento del Desarrollo No. 105. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Arenas de Mesa, A. (2010). Historia de la Reforma Previsional Chilena: Una Experiencia Exitosa de Política Pública en Democracia. Santiago de Chile: OIT.
Arenas de Mesa, A., and Montecinos, V. (1999). “The Privatization of Social Security and Women’s Welfare: Gender Effects of the Chilean Reform,” Latin American Research Review, 34(3): 7–37.
Arenas de Mesa, A., Llanes, M. C., and Miranda, F. (2006). “Protección social efectiva, calidad de la cobertura, equidad y efectos distributivos del sistema de pensiones en Chile.” Serie Financiamiento del Desarrollo No. 172. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Bachelet, M. (2005). Estoy Contigo: Programa de Gobierno. Santiago de Chile.
Bachelet, M. (2006). Plan de 100 dias: Las 36 medidas de la Presidenta Michelle Bachelet para sus primeros dias de Gobierno. Gobierno de Chile: Santiago de Chile.
Baldez, L. (2001). “Coalition Politics and the Limits of State Feminism in Chile,” Women & Politics, 22(4): 1–28.
Baldez, L., and Carey, J. M. (1999). “Presidential Agenda Control and Spending Policy: Lessons from General Pinochet’s Constitution,” American Journal of Political Science, 43(1): 29–55.
BCN. (2009). Historia de la Ley N° 20.379: Crea el Sistema Intersectorial de Protección Social e institucionaliza el Subsistema de Protección Integral a la Infancia, Chile Crece Contigo. Valparaíso: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (BCN).
Borzutzky, S. (2010). “Socioeconomic Policies: Taming the Market in a Globalized Economy.” In S. Borzutzky and G. B. Weeks (Eds.), The Bachelet Government: Conflict and Consensus in Post-Pinochet Chile (pp. 87–114). Gainsville: University Press of Florida.
Bravo, D. (2010). Evaluación de la Reforma Previsional a la Luz de los Resultados de la Encuesta de Protección Social 2009. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Microdatos, Universidad de Chile.
Burton, G. (2012). “Hegemony and Frustration: Education Policy Making in Chile under the Concertación, 1990–2010,” Latin American Perspectives, 39(4): 34–52.
Cámara de Diputados. (2010). “Diputados DC critican drástica reducción de presupuesto para educación técnica y preescolar.” Noticias del Congreso, Valparaíso.
CAPRPI. (2006). El futuro de los niños siempre es hoy: Propuestas del Consejo Asesor Presidencial para la Reforma de las Políticas de Infancia. Santiago de Chile: Consejo Asesor Presidencial para la Reforma de las Políticas de Infancia (CAPRPI).
Castiglioni, R. (2005). The Politics of Social Policy Change in Chile and Uruguay. Retrenchment versus Maintenance, 1973–1998. New York and London: Routledge.
Dion, M. (2008). “Pension Reform and Gender Inequality.” In S. Kay and T. Sinha (Eds.), Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas (pp. 134–162). New York: Oxford University Press.
ECLAC. (2014). CEPALSTAT: Databases and Statistical Publications. http://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/WEB_CEPALSTAT/estadisti-casIndicadores.asp?idioma=i [Accessed 1st April 2014]
Ewig, C., and Kay, S. J. (2011). “Postretrenchment Politics: Policy Feedback in Chile’s Health and Pension Reforms,” Latin American Politics and Society, 53(4): 67–99.
Franceschet, S. (2010). “The Gendered Dimensions of Rituals, Rules and Norms in the Chilean Congress,” The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(3): 394–407.
Frank, V. (2004). “Politics without Policy: The Failure of Social Concertation in Democratic Chile, 1990–2000.” In P. Winn (Ed.), Victims of the Chilean Miracle: Workers and Neoliberalism in the Pinochet Era, 1973–2002 (pp. 71–124). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Godoy, L. (2011). “Maternidad y Trabajo: las voces de las madres trabajadoras.” In E. Ansoleaga Moreno (Ed.), Mujer, Trabajo, Maternidad, Salud: Tensiones no resueltas del siglo XX y propuestas para el Bicentenario (pp. 304–389). Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales.
JUNJI. (2012a). Respuesta a Solicitud de Acceso N°4647 (SAIP), April 11, 2013.
JUNJI. (2012b). Respuesta a Solicitud de Acceso N°4990 (SAIP), May 29, 2013.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.
Leiva, F. (1998). “Neoliberal and Neostructuralist Theories of Competitiveness: The Case of Chile’s Manufatured Export 1973–1996.” PhD Dissertation. University of Massachusetts: Amherst.
López, D. (2009). La agenda laboral del gobierno de Michelle Bachelet: subsidios y promesas. Santiago de Chile: Fundación Friedrich Ebert.
Mackay, F. (2009). “Institutionalising ‘new politics’ in post devolution Scotland: ‘nested newness’ and the gendered limits of change,” paper presented at the European Conference on Politics and Gender, Queen’s University Belfast, January 21–23, 2009.
Mackay, F. (2014), “Remembering the Old, forgetting the new: ‘nested newness’ and the limits of gendered institutional change,” Politics & Gender, 10(4): 459–471.
Mahoney, J., and Thelen, K. (2010). “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marco, F. (Ed.). (2004). Los sistemas de pensiones en América Latina: un análisis de género. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC/Gobierno de los Países Bajos.
MDS. (2006). Encuesta de Caracterización Socio-Económica (CASEN). “Ministerio de Desarrollo Social, Observatorio Social.” www.ministeri-odesarrollosocial.gob.cl/observatorio/casen [Accessed March 25, 2013]
MDS. (2011). Encuesta de Caracterización Socio-Económica (CASEN). Ministerio de Desarrollo Social, Observatorio Social www.ministeriode-sarrollosocial.gob.cl/observatorio/casen [Accessed April 17, 2013]
Mesa-Lago, C. (2004). “Lecciones y desafíos de 23 años de reformas estructurales de pensiones en América Latina.” In Oficina Internacional del Trabajo (Ed.), El sistema de pensiones en Chile en el contexto mundial y de América Latina: Evaluatión y desafíos. Santiago de Chile: Oficina Internacional del Trabajo (OIT).
Mesa-Lago, C. (2009). “Efectos de la crisis global sobre la seguridad social de salud y pensiones en América Latina y el Caribe y recomendaciones de políticas.” Serie Políticas Sociales No. 150. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Mideplan. (2010). Cuatro años creciendo juntos: Memoria de la instalación del Sistema de Protección Integral a la Infancia Chile Crece Contigo 2006–2010. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Planificación (Mideplan).
Ortiz, M. E. (2009). Cuenta Pública Junji Gestión 2006–2009. http://www.junji.cl/junjijoomla/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=176&func=startdown&id=78 [Accessed September 28, 2009] Ortiz, M. E. (2014). “Educación parvularia, el pilar de la reforma.” El Mostrador. [Online] 6th June 2014. http://www.elmostrador.cl/opinion/2014/06/06/educacion-parvularia-el-pilar-de-la-reforma/ [Accessed August 6, 2014]
Podestà, A. (2007). La Dimensión de Género en la Reforma del Sistema de Pensiones Chileno. Tésis para optar al grado de magíster en economía aplicada. Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile.
Ruiz, C. (2012). “New Social Conflicts under Bachelet,” Latin American Perspectives, 39(4): 71–84.
Sandbrook, R., Edelman, M., Heller, P., and Teichman, J. (2007). Social Democracy in the Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges, Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sehnbruch, K. (2009). “A Record Number of Conflicts? Michelle Bachelet’s Inheritance of Unresolved Employment Issues,” Working Paper No. 27. Berkeley: Center for Latin American Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
SERNAM. (2007). Agenda de Género 2006/2010. Santiago de Chile: Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (SERNAM).
Sheahan, J. (2002). “Alternative Models of Capitalism in Latin America.” In E. Huber (Ed.), Models of Capitalism: Lessons for Latin America (pp. 25–52). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Siavelis, P. (2006). “Accommodating Informal Institutions and Democracy in Chile.” In G. Helmke and S. Levitsky (Eds.), Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America (pp. 33–55). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
SPS. (2014a). Ficha Estadística Previsional, N°20-Julio 2014. Santiago de Chile: Superintendencia de Pensiones.
Staab, S. (2010). “Social Investment Policies in Chile and Latin America: Towards Equal Opportunities for Women and Children?” Journal of Social Policy, 39(04): 607–626.
Staab, S. (2012). “Maternalism, Male-Breadwinner Bias, and Market Reform: Historical Legacies and Current Reforms in Chilean Social Policy.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(3): 299–332.
Staab, S. (2014). “(En)gendering Change and Continuity in Chilean Social Policy: Actors, Ideas and Institutions.” PhD thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Streeck, W., and Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, M. (2003). “The Reformulation of Social Policy in Chile, 1973–2001. Questioning a Neo-Liberal Model,” Global Social Policy, 3(1): 21–44.
Taylor, M. (2006). “From National Development to ‘Growth with Equity’: Nation-building in Chile, 1950–2000,” Third World Quarterly, 27(1): 69–84.
Uthoff, A. (2001). “La reforma del sistema de pensiones en Chile: desafíos pendientes.” Serie Financiamiento del Desarrollo No. 112. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Yáñez, S. (2010). La dimensión de género en la reforma previsional chilena (Ley No 20.255 de reforma de pensiones). Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Silke Staab
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Staab, S. (2016). Opportunities and Constraints on Gender-Egalitarian Policy Change: Michelle Bachelet’s Social Protection Agenda (2006–2010). In: Waylen, G. (eds) Gender, Institutions, and Change in Bachelet’s Chile. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501981_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501981_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69935-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50198-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)