Abstract
The American legal scholar Douglas Laycock argues that the same-sex marriage debate has been an instance of the “Puritan mistake” (Laycock 2008). According to Laycock, the Puritans came to the United States to gain religious freedom, but once they had a theocracy in Massachusetts that was enough liberty for them: people of other Christian denominations and other faiths could go elsewhere if they wanted to be free. His example shows the difficulty in maintaining a level playing field among different, potentially-conflicting interests. Religious truth is one, which the Puritans were unwilling to compromise; ideology and public policy can also be uncompromising in their consequences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Iain McLean and Scot Peterson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLean, I., Peterson, S. (2016). Religious Freedom and Anti-discrimination in Europe and the US: Generally Applicable Laws and Possible Exceptions. In: Carling, A. (eds) The Social Equality of Religion or Belief. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501950_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501950_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69933-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50195-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)