Abstract
The US Establishment Clause is in disorder. There are currently at least six different approaches to interpreting the ‘establishment’ component of the First Amendment injunction that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof… ” (US Constitution, Amendment 1). Tests of church-state separation, non-coercion, secularity, historical practice, non-endorsement and neutrality all have been used by the Supreme Court at one time or another across a broad panoply of cases. Sometimes two or more of these tests have been squeezed together within a single case, with implied reassurances that the result does not really depend upon the test anyway. At levels below the Supreme Court, this sort of doctrinal bricolage is often only prudent self-protective practice by judges compelled by the Court’s opacity to hedge their bets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Marc O. DeGirolami
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
DeGirolami, M.O. (2016). The Bloating of the Constitution: Equality and the US Establishment Clause. In: Carling, A. (eds) The Social Equality of Religion or Belief. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501950_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501950_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69933-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50195-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)