The Cogwheels of Culture

  • Arne Dietrich


Culture evolves; in at least this much, there is agreement. The vexed question is how. We pass on cultural units — things, skills, beliefs, and so on — which leave behind a trail of gradual and cumulative changes. The sticking point is this: Is cultural evolution Darwinian? This hot-button topic is long on sneering and short on substance with people digging in for the long haul. Champions of Darwinism in culture like to describe their opponents as mushy humanists and soft-headed poets who, having overdosed on postmodernism, are prone to panic attacks whenever they hear the rattling of the saber of science. Not to be outdone, the opponents heap scorn on the entire enterprise of Darwinizing the social sciences and humanities and like to depict their rivals as overzealous scientists and pigheaded technophiles who, having overdosed on positivism, erratically swing the club of Darwinism at everything in sight. Amidst all the pugnacious hyperbole, writing about it makes you want to wear a safety helmet.


Biological Evolution Cultural Evolution Cultural Artifact Modern Synthesis Epigenetic Inheritance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Recommended readings

  1. Darwin, C. (1859/1968). The origin of species. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s’ dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. Gould, S.J. (1979). Shades of Lamarck. Natural History, 88, 22–28.Google Scholar
  6. Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Kronfeldner, M. E. (2010). Darwinian “blind” hypothesis formation revisited. Synthese, 175, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 329–347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Simonton, D. K. (2007). The creative process in Picasso’s Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variation. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Arne Dietrich 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Dietrich
    • 1
  1. 1.American University of BeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations