Skip to main content
  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

From the outset, Western European and Soviet officials were aware that the gas trade across the iron curtain involved political risks. During the decades that followed, their cooperation survived several major East-West crises without affecting the gas trade. However, Brussels’s intervention in its pursuit of open access to Russia’s energy resources was rejected by Russia. From about 2005 onwards, the European Commission increasingly took it upon itself to control and limit the energy relationship with Gazprom. Meanwhile, Russia’s gas exports to former Soviet republics were complicated by difficulties to pay, followed by Russian demands for political and economic concessions. In Ukraine, the involvement of “oligarchs” as intermediaries at both ends led to interminable additional complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper: “Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply” Brussels, 29 November 2000, Com(2000) 769.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Anderson, “Europe’s Dependence on Russian Natural Gas: Perspectives and Recommendations for a Long Term Strategy” in George C. Marshall,(ed.), European Centre for Security Studies, 19 September 2008, Garmisch-Partenkirchen: Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Per Högselius, “Red Gas: Russia and the Origins of European Energy Dependence” (Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series) (Kindle Locations 2260–2263). Palgrave Macmillan. Kindle Edition (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Dohmen and C. Pauly, Der Spiegel, “Russian Riddle: EU Can’t Agree on a Natural Gas Strategy”, 24 June 2014, http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/european-leaders-cannot-agree-on-contingency-plan-for-naturalgas-a-976929.html.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jan Puhl, “The Radical Pragmatist: Donald Tusk Provides Strong Voice for Eastern Europe,” Spiegel Online International, 26 November 2014, http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/a-1005004.html#ref=nl-international.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Francis, “Christian Science Monitor,” 6 March 2008, http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2008/0306/p06s01-wogn.html.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anjli Raval, “Financial Times”, 22 October 2014, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/035ee6fe-4966–11e4–8d68–00144feab7de.html#axzz3Grl8Zt35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kandiyoti, “Pipelines: Oil Flows and Crude Politics,” IB Tauris, London, 2012. (Paperback edition) pp. 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andrei Belyi, “Russia’s Position on the Energy Charter”, 27 April 2012, http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/Research/Russia%20and%20Eurasia/270412summary.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Isachenkov, “Little Expected From EU/Russia Summit,” Washington Post, 17 May 2007, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/17/AR2007051701668.html.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Pirani, J. Stern and K. Yafimava, “The Russo-Ukrainian Gas Dispute of January 2009: a Comprehensive Assessment” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, February 2009, http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/NG27-TheRussoUkrainianGasDisputeofJanuary2009AComprehensiveAssessment-JonathanSternSimonPiraniKatjaYafimava-2009.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Serhy Yekelchyk, “Ukraine: Birth of a Modern Nation,” Oxford University Press, 2007, [Kindle Edition (Kindle location: 2952)].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smolansky, O. M., “Ukraine and Russia: An Evolving Marriage of Inconvenience”, ORBIS, 48, 1 (Winter 2004), pp. 117–134, http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00304387/2004/00000048/00000001/ art00117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pravda. Ru, “Anatoly Chubais: Russia should aim to create liberal empire in CIS”, 25 September 2003, http://english.pravda.ru/news/russia/25–09–2003/52757–0/#. VGEAx3lyYkI.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Kupchinsky, “Russia/Ukraine: Time Running Out In Gas Dispute,” RFE/Radio Liberty, 28 December 2005, http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2005/12/21569639–80 60–401A-82F1–74048E747922.html.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ian Jeffries, “Economic Developments in Contemporary Russia,” Routledge 2011, Oxon (UK), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Rafael Kandiyoti

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kandiyoti, R. (2015). Natural Gas as a Political Weapon?. In: Powering Europe: Russia, Ukraine, and the Energy Squeeze. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137501646_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics