Skip to main content

EU-Russia Relations and Norm Diffusion: The Role of Non-state Actors

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

Abstract

The European Union (EU) and Russia have developed an intense dialogue that has been deepened and enlarged from the year 2000 onwards. Despite growing misunderstandings, the interaction in the institutional framework of cooperation has shown that the existence of a dialogue has been valuable to partially bring together mutual perceptions (especially the EU28 and the more assertive Russia). In some cases, the dialogue may be compared to a ‘dialogue of the deaf’ because Brussels would like to interact with a more European Russia and one which is convergent with its political values and economic rules; whereas Russia wants to be recognised as an equal partner, and is willing to redefine some rules of the international game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie, B. and Smouts, M-C. 1995. Le retournement du monde: sociologie de la scène internationale. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, N. 2007. Clan with a Plan, Financial Times, 28 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément, C. 2007. La Russie rebelle. Au coeur des luttes, le travail et l’habitat, Alternatives internationales, 37, Décembre, pp. 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devin, G. 2002. Sociologie des relations internationales. Paris. La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolidze, T. 2015. EU Sanctions Policy towards Russia: The Sanctioner-Sanctionee’s Game of Thrones. CEPS Working Document, 402, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, J. E. and Pfaltzgraff, Jr., R. L. 2003. Relações Internacionais. As Teorias em Confronto. Lisboa: Gradiva.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHR 2014. First Section. Applications nos. 32631/09 and 53799/12, Communicated on 28 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eismontet, M. et al. 2010. Civil Society in Russia: How Managed Democracy Misfires, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2 March, http://www.carnegieendowment.org/events/?fa=eventDetail&id=2850, [Accessed 10 March 2010].

  • European Commission 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Wider Europe Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with Our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. COM (2003) 104 final, Brussels, 11 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 2008. Commission Staff Document accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the Council. Review of EU-Russia Relations Pursuant to the Extraordinary European Council of September 1, 2008. SEC (2008) 2786, Brussels, 5 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 2013. The Common Steps towards Visa Free Short-term Travel of Russian and EU Citizens (Russia-EU visa dialogue), December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament 2012. European Parliament Recommendation of 23 October 2012 to the Council on Establishing Common Cisa Restrictions for Russian Officials Involved in the Sergei Magnitsky Case (2012/2142(INI)), 23 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat 2008. EU — Russia Summit. EU27 Trade in Goods with Russia up by a Quarter in the First Half of 2008, Press Releases RAPID, 11 November, http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=STAT/08/156&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en [Accessed 12 November 2008].

  • Fernandes, S. 2008. EU Policies towards Russia, 1999–2007: Realpolitik Intended. In: N. Tocci (ed.) Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? The European Union and its Global Partners. Brussels: CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times 2007. A Russian Travesty. Financial Times, 26 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golos 2008. Election Authorities Attempt to Block ‘Golos’ Election Day Observation Efforts, Golos, 2 March, http://www.golos.org/a1310.html [Accessed 6 December 2007].

  • Hargreaves, S. 2013. Why Russia is Irate about the Cyprus Bank Tax, CNN Money, 19 March, http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/19/news/economy/cyprus-russia/ [Accessed 19 October 2013].

  • Human Rights Watch 2008. Choking on Bureaucracy. State Curbs on Independent Civil Society Activism, Human Rights Watch, 1, 20 February, http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2008/02/19/choking-bureaucracy-0 [Accessed 3 March 2008].

  • Jégo. M. 2008a. Dimitri Medvedev élu président, la Russie spécule sur une possible rivalité avec Vladimir Poutine, Le Monde, 3 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jégo, M. 2008b. Medvedev salué à l’étranger, critique par des opposants, Le Monde, 4 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. 1986. Reciprocity in International Relations, International Organizations, 1(40), Winter: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Monde. 2008. L’élection de Medvedev n’a pas été “libre” et “juste”, selon les observateurs occidentaux’, Le Monde with AFP and Reuters, 3 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavroidis, P. C. 2008. No Outsourcing of Law? WTO Law as Practiced by WTO Courts, The American Journal of International Law, 3(102), 421–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meleshkina, E. 2003. Élections sous contrôle. In: M. Mendras (ed.) Comment fonctionne la Russie? Le politique, le bureaucrate et l’oligarque. Paris: CERI autrement, pp. 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendras, M. (ed.) 2003. Comment fonctionne la Russie? Le politique, le bureaucrate et l’oligarque, Paris: CERI autrement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mens, Y. 2007. Russie: une société muselée. Alternatives internationales, 37, December 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlin, A. (ed.) 2007a. Où va la Russie? Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlin, A. 2007b. La Russie entre législatives et présidentielles. Conférence publique, Bruxelles: Université Libre de Bruxelles, 4 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnighamand, K. J. and Roth, A. E. 1983. Expecting Continued Play in Prisoner’s Dilemma Games: A Test of Several Models. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 27, June: 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojuland, K. 2013. Why the EU Needs a Magnitsky Act? EuropeanVoice.com, 4 April, http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/why-the-eu-needs-a-magnitsky-act/76863.aspx [Accessed 15 October 2013].

  • Orttung, R. W. 2010. Understanding Recent Developments in Russia’s Political System, Russian Analytical Digest, 77, 26 April 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • PBN 2007. Russia Election Update, The PBN Company, 4, December, http://www.freedomhouse.hu/pdfdocs/Think%20Tanks%20in%20Central%20Europe.pdf [Accessed 20 January 2015].

  • Petrov, N. 2006. Elections in Russia’s Overmanaged Democracy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 20 April, http://www.carnegieendowment.org/events/?fa=eventDetail&id=882 [Accessed 14 December 2006].

  • President of the Russian Federation 2005. Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, 25 April. http://eng.kremlin.ru/speeches/2005/04/25/2031_type70029type82912_87086.shtml [Accessed 5 May 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • President of the Russian Federation 2008. Federal Law Nº. 57-FZ of April 29, 2008 ‘Procedures for Foreign Investments in the Business Entities Of Strategic Importance for Russian National Defence and State Security’ (non-official translation), Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation, http://www.fas.gov.ru/english/legislation/20300.shtml [Accessed 20 April 2008.

  • President of the Russian Federation 2014. Address by President of the Russian Federation, 18 March, http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/news/6889/print [Accessed 17 November 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Radio Free Europe 2010. Regional Elections Give Russia’s Ruling Party Food For Thought. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 15 March, http://www.rferl.org/content/Russian_Ruling_Party_Heads_For_Victory_In_Local_Elections/1983658.html [Accessed 15 March 2010].

  • Rasmusen, E. 2001. Games & Information. An Introduction to Game Theory, 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. et al. 1998. Democracy and its Alternatives. Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russia Votes 2007. Results of Previous Presidential Elections, Centre for the Study of Public Policy and The Levada Centre Moscow. http://www.russiavotes.org/president/presidency_previous.php, [Accessed 20 January, 2008].

  • Russia Votes 2008. Results of Previous Elections to the Russian State Duma, Centre for the Study of Public Policy and The Levada Centre Moscow, http://www.russiavotes.org/Duma/Duma_elections_93–03.php [Accessed 20 January 2008].

  • Salminen, M-M. and Moshes, A. 2009. Practice What You Preach. The Prospects for Visa Freedom in Russia-EU Relations. FIIA Report, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevtsova, L. 2007. Russia: Lost in Transition. The Yeltsin and Putin Legacy. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevtsova, L. 2008. Les faux-semblants du pouvoir russe. Le Monde, 13 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupe, A. C. 2008. AEB Weighs in On Draft Investment Bill in Duma. The Moscow News, 28 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza, L. V. de. 2008. Foreign Investment in Russia’, ECFIN Country Focus, 1, 5 January, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication10969_en.pdf [Accessed 23 February 2015].

  • Tass 2015. Russia to Respond to US Expansion of Sanctions under Magnitsky Act Foreign Ministry, Tass, 25 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Associated Press 2014. Russia Reaches Out to Europe’s Far-Right Parties. The Moscow Times, 14 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Freedom House 2009. Nations in Transit 2009, http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=485 [Accessed 10 November 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  • The Freedom House 2014. Russia, https://freedomhouse.org/country/russia#.VNyMx4dyYuT [Accessed 5 December 2014].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocci, N. (ed.) 2008. Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, D. 2002. A Russia-within-Europe: Working toward a New Security rrangement. In D. Trenin et al. Russia’s Security Policy and EU-Russian Relations. Brussels: CEPS and IISS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, D. 2007. Getting Russia Right. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuand, J. and Axelrod, R. 1995. How to Cope with Noise in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 1 March, pp. 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakharova, M. 2013. Answer from Maria Zakharova, Deputy Director of the Information and Press Department of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, 12 December, http://mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/54EF6C2570B2916A44257C4300575368 [Accessed 10 November 2014].

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Sandra Fernandes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fernandes, S. (2016). EU-Russia Relations and Norm Diffusion: The Role of Non-state Actors. In: Piet, R., Simão, L. (eds) Security in Shared Neighbourhoods. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137499103_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics