Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

International Relations and Future Threats

  • Chapter
Unmanned Combat Air Systems in Future Warfare

  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

The issues that form military doctrine and political policies towards international relations are complex. The types of military systems required to enforce these doctrines and policies are predicated on the likely scenarios that states may encounter. It is important, therefore, to have an understanding of where future threats are likely to emerge; only then can coherent strategic doctrine be formulated and the correct military equipment procurement and training policies be implemented. No country or region should be viewed in isolation; rather how they relate to each other should be considered. This is a fundamental premise of international relations. Whether there will be major state-on-state conflicts in the coming epochs is debatable, but is, nonetheless, a major consideration for any government’s military strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Rupert Smith, The Utility of Force, pp. 16–17. For a view on the role of people and states in future wars, which offers a different perspective to Smith’s, see generally, Pascal Vennesson, ‘War without the People’, in The Changing Character of War, Hew Strachan and Sibylle Scheipers (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 241–251.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Colin S. Gray, Another Bloody Century, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2005, p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Michael Howard, The Invention of Peace & the Reinvention of War, London: Profile Books, 2001, pp. 99 and 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hew Strachan, The Changing Character of War (Europaeum Lecture), Oxford: The Europaeum, 2007, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Azar Gat, ‘The Changing Character of War’, in The Changing Character of War, Hew Strachan and Sibylle Scheipers (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hew Strachen, ‘Strategy’, in The Changing Character of War, Hew Strachan and Sibylle Scheipers (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 514–520.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernard Brodie (ed.), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order, New York: Harcourt and Brace, 1946, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brodie was writing with reference to a nuclear deterrence and expanded on his thoughts in Bernard Brodie, ‘The Development of Nuclear Strategy’, International Security, 2(2), 1978, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernard Brodie, The Anatomy of Deterrence, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1958, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Development, Concept and Doctrine Centre, Strategic Trends Programme: Global Strategic Trends — Out to 2040, 4th Edition, Shrivenham: UK Ministry of Defence, 2010, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hu Angang and Men Honghua, The Rising of Modern China: Comprehensive National Power and Grand Strategy, Center for China Studies at Tsinghua University, 2004, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Although not an exhaustive list, among the best works are: Jonathan Fenby, The Penguin History of Modern China: The Fall and Rise of a Geat Power 1850–2008, London: The Penguin Group, 2008;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Odd Arne Westad, Restless Empire: China and the World since 1750, London: Random House, 2012;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henry Kissinger, On China, London: Penguin Books, 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas J. Christensen, Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the Peoples Republic of China 2010, Washington, DC, 2010, p. I.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin Jacques, When China Rules the World, London: Penguin Books, 2012, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. In 1870, China’s GDP was $189,740 million while that of the US was $98,374 million. In 1913, the US GDP was $517,383 million while China’s was $241,344 million — see Angus Maddison, The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, Paris: OECD, 2001, Table B-18, p. 261.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. See generally, Jonathan Fenby, Tiger Head, Snake Tails: China Today, How It Got There and Where It is Heading, London: Simon & Schuster, 2012, pp. 164–194.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chistina Lin, The New Silk Road: China’s Energy Strategy in the Greater Middle East, Washington, DC: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2011, pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs, 2004, p. x. For the definitive explanation of what soft power is, including its limitations, see ibid., pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a view on China’s doctrine of regional ‘soft power’, and its relationship with the US, see Shaun Breslin, ‘Understanding China’s Regional Rise’, International Affairs, 85(4), 2009, 827–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Avery Goldstein, Rising to the Challenge: China’s Grand Strategy and International Security, Studies in Asian Security, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005, p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mitsuru Kitano, ‘China’s Foreign Strategy’, Asia-Pacific Review, 18(2), 2011, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. See generally, Niall Ferguson, Civilization, London: Penguin Books, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robert D. Kaplan, ‘The Geography of Chinese Power: How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea?’, Foreign Affairs, 89(3), 2010, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Geoffrey Till, Asia’s Naval Expansion: An Arms Race in the Making?, Adelphi Series, London: IISS, 2012, p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See analysis from Kimberly Hsu, Craig Murray, and Matt Wild, China’s 2012 Defense White Paper: The Diversified Employment of China’s Armed Forces’, Washington, DC: U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 3 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robert Sutter, ‘China and US Interests: Opportunities and Challenges’, in US-China-EU Relations: Managing the New World Order, Robert Ross, Oystein Tunsjo, and Zhang Tuosheng (eds), Abingdon: Routledge, 2010, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Rajah Rasiah, Zhang Miao, and Kong Xin Xin, ‘Can China’s Miraculous Economic Growth Continue?’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2(43), 2012, p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Erica Strecker Downs, China’s Quest for Energy Security, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2000, pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  32. C. J. Pehrson, String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power across the Asian Littoral, Strategic Studies Institute United States Army War College, 2006, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jonathan Holslag, Trapped Giant: China’s Military Rise, Abingdon: Routledge, 2010, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2011, Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 2011, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roger Cliff, The Military Potential of China’s Commercial Technology, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001, p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Andrew S. Erickson, ‘China’s Evolving Anti-Access Approach: “Where’s the Nearest (U.S.) Carrier?”’, China Brief, 10(18), 2010, pp. 5–8. For the reasons behind China’s military build-up and the possible demise of the US credibility in offering stability in the Western Pacific, see Friedberg, A Contest for Supremacy, pp. 218–224.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rosemary Foot and Andrew Walter, China, the United States, and Global Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 302–303.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Richard Halloran, ‘Airsea Battle’, Air Force Magazine, 93(8), 2010, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  39. For a historical perspective on China’s A2/AD doctrine and ways of better recognising these types of paradigm shifts in capabilities, see Dr Thomas G. Mahken, ‘China’s Anti-Access Strategy in Historical and Theoretical Perspective’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(3), 2011, 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. For a discussion on China’s ASBM development and its implications for the US and its allies, see Michael Chase, Andrew Erickson, and Christopher Yeaw, ‘Chinese Theater and Strategic Missile Force Modernization and Its Implications for the United States’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 32(1), 2009, 67–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Andrew S. Erickson, ‘Chinese ASBM Development: Knowns and Unknowns’, China Brief, 9(13), 2010, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Eric Hagt and Matthew Durnin, ‘Space, China’s Tactical Frontier’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(5), 2011, 748–749.

    Google Scholar 

  43. David A. Shlapak and others, A Question of Balance: Political Context and Military Aspects of China-Taiwan Dispute, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009, pp. 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ian M. Easton and L. C. Russell Hsiao, The Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Project: Organizational Capacities and Operational Capabilities, Arlington, VA: Project 2049 Institute, 2013, pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Evans, ‘US “Failed to Spot China’s Rapid Advance in Missiles and Jets”’. A US Congressional Research Service analysis describes the potential counters to China’s ASBM, in particular what is required to break the ASBM’s ‘Kill Chain’ — see Ronald O’Rourke, China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities — Background and Issues for Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, April 2013, pp. 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Combat Air Solutions Ltd, UK

    Colin Wills (Director)

Authors
  1. Colin Wills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2015 Colin Wills

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wills, C. (2015). International Relations and Future Threats. In: Unmanned Combat Air Systems in Future Warfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498496_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation