Abstract
The demoniac’s experience, in its spreading severity, may appear at first blush to have been unusual, but spiritualities, prophetic and malefic, could be ecstatic and expansive. They were celebrated and critically considered. Spiritual experience was both intensely personal and communal. Female prophets, for instance, sang incessantly to audiences while they ached and starved. They spoke of hell and damnation broadly and easily while their actions were recorded. These furies were spiritual and wrathful. Dorothy White railed against Oxford; Sarah Wight turned her anger into self-loathing; but in prophesying these women spoke out with an authority that came from outside of them. They worked for God and trumpeted his message. However, prophetic utterances were only considered authentic when the prophesier lived and looked like a prophet. She needed an audience to validate her claims and a spiritual alias, or a spiritual second-self, to validate what she was saying. Failure or inability to do so might mean being saddled with the epithet of tub-preacher.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Henry Goodcole, The Wonderful Discovery of Elizabeth Sawyer a Witch Late of Edmonton (London: 1621), C1-C2.
G. Co., A breife narration of the possession, dispossession, and, repossession of William Sommers (London, 1598), Sig. B.
Thomas Jollie, A vindication of the Surey demoniack as no impostor (London, 1698), 74.
Brian Levack, Devil Within: Possession and Exorcism in the Christian West (Cumberland: Yale University Press, 2013), 140
For more information, see Claus Lamm, C. Daniel Batson, and Jean Decety, “The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-Taking and Cognitive Appraisal,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19, no. 1 (2007): 42–58.
John Stearne, A Confirmation and Discovery of Witchcraft (London, 1648).
Vittorio Gallese, “The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity,” Psychopathology 36 (2003): 171–180.
Evan Thompson, “Empathy and Consciousness,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (2001): 1–32.
Tania Singer and Claus Lamm, “The Social Neuroscience of Empathy,” The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience 1156 (2009): 81–96.
Eddie Harmon-Jones and Piotr Winkielman (eds.), Social Neuroscience (New York: Guildford Press, 2007), 31–32.
Knut Schnella, Sarah Bluschkeb, Brigitte Konradtc, and Henrik Walterb, “Functional Relations of Empathy and Mentalizing: An fMRI Study on the Neural Basis of Cognitive Empathy,” Neuro Image 54, no. 2 (2011): 1743–1754.
Marco Iacoboni, “Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons,” Annual Review Psychology 60 (2009): 653–670, 655.
Jean Decety and Claus Lamm, “Human Empathy through the Lens of Social Neuroscience,” The Scientific World Journal 6 (2006): 1146–1163, 1156.
Claus Lamm, C. Daniel Batson, and Jean Decety, “The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-Taking and Cognitive Appraisal,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19, no. 1 (2007): 42–58.
James Carmichael, Newes from Scotland, declaring the damnable life and death of Doctor Fian (London, 1591).
Daniel M. Gross, The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006), 2.
Pablo Briñol and Richard E. Petty, “Embodied Persuasion: Fundamental Processes by Which Bodily Responses Can Impact Attitudes,” in Embodied Grounding Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, ed. Gün R Semin and Eliot R Smith (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 184–207.
Daniel Casasanto and Katinka Dijkstra, “Motor Action and Emotional Memory,” Cognition 115 (2010): 179–185, 180.
Thomas Ady, A candle in the dark (London, 1655), 71.
See Francis Hutchinson, An historical essay concerning witchcraft (London, 1712), 27.
Reginald Scot, The Discovery of Witchcraft (London, 1585), 71–72.
Wallace Notestien, History of Witchcraft in England from 1558 to 1718 (Washington: Kessigner Publishing, 1911), 59.
Samuel Harsnett, A Declaration of egregious Popish Impostures (London, 1603).
Also see Frank Walsh Brownlow and Samuel Harsnett, Shakespeare, Harsnett, and the Devils of Denham (Cranbury: Associated University Press, 1993).
See Thomas Freeman’s “Demons, Deviance and Defiance: John Darrell and the Politics of Exorcism in Late Elizabeth,” Conformity and Orthodoxy in the English Church, C. 1560–1660, ed. Peter Lake & Michael C. Questier (Boydell Press: Woodbridge, 2000), 34–63.
Ben Johnson, The Divell is an Asse a Comedie Acted in the Yeare 1616 (London, 1641), V: III, 57.
Ben Jonson, Volpone or The foxe (1607), Sig N3-N3v.
Great Britain. Public Record Office, Calendar of State Papers: Domestic Series, of the Reign of Charles I, 1629–1631 (London: Longman, 1830), 198–199.
Great Britain Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts, Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, Reign of Charles: 1633–1634. Vol 6, 1635, ed. John Bruce (London: Longman, 1865), 477.
William Drage, Daimonomageia (London, 1665), 41.
Robert Howson, The second part of the boy of Bilson, or, A true and particular relation of the imposter Susanna Fowles (London, 1698), 16.
Anon., A full and true account of the life: and also the manner and method of carrying on the delusions, blasphemies, and notorious cheats of Susan Fowls (London, 1698), 3, 5–6.
For more on Hathaway, see Hal Gladfelder, “Criminal Trials and the Dilemmas of Narrative Realism, 1650–1750,” Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism 20, no. 3 (1997): 21–48, esp. 31–33;
William Renwick Riddell, “A Curious ‘Witchcraft’ Case,” Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology $119, no. 2 (1928): 231–236, 232–235.
See James Sharpe, The Bewitching of Anne Gunter (New York: Routledge, 2000), 7;
and Philip C. Almond’s The Witches of Warboys (London: IB Tauris, 2008), 35.
L. W. Barsalou, “Abstraction in Perceptual Symbol Systems,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 358 (2003): 1180.
Ginevra Castellano, Loic Kessous, and George Caridak, “Multimodal Emotion Recognition from Expressive Faces, Body Gestures and Speech,” in Affect in Human Computer Interaction, ed. Christian Peter and Russell Beale (Berlin: Springer, 2008), 92–103, 93.
Also see Ana M. Gonzâlez-Roldan, Mercedes Martínez-Jauand, Miguel A. Muñoz-García, Carolina Sitges, Ignasi Cifre, and Pedro Montoya, “Temporal Dissociation in the Brain Processing of Pain and Anger Faces with Different Intensities of Emotional Expression,” Pain 152, no. 4 (2011): 853–859.
Christine Blackmean, “Scientist Studies Emotion in Psychology, Art and Acting to Help Autistics,” Stanford Report (March 25, 2010) http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/march/wilkins-facesresearch-032510.html.
Amy Coplan, “Catching Characters’ Emotions: Emotional Contagion Responses to Narrative Fiction Film,” Film Studies 8 (2006): 26–38.
Harald G. Wallbott and Klaus R. Scherer, “Cues and Channels in Emotion Recognition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no. 4 (1986): 690–699.
Chris Holland, “Reading and Acting in the World: Conversations about Empathy,” Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 14, no. 4 (2007): 529–544.
Bruce C. Ballon, Ivan Silver, and Donald Fidle, “Headspace Theater: An Innovative Method for Experiential Learning of Psychiatric Symptomatology Using Modified Role-Playing and Improvisational Theater Techniques,” Academic Psychiatry 31 (2007): 380–387;
Alan W. Dow, David Leong, Aaron Anderson, Richard P. Wenzel, and VCU Theater-Medicine Team, “Using Theater to Teach Clinical Empathy: A Pilot Study,” Journal of General Internal Medicine 2 (2007): 1114–1118;
Linda A. Deloney, C. James Graham, “Wit: Using Drama to Teach First-Year Medical Students about Empathy and Compassion,” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 15, no. 4 (2003): 247–251.
Klaus. R. Scherer, “Universality of Emotional Expression,” Encyclopedia of Human Emotion, vol. 1, ed. D. Levinson, J. Ponzetti, and P. Jorgenson (New York: Macmillan, 1999), 669–674, 671.
Thomas Potts, The Wonderfull discoverie of witches in the countie of Lancaster (London, 1613), 46.
John Darrel, The Doctrine of the Possession and Dispossession of Demoniakes (London? 1600), 2.
Samuel Harsnett, A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practises of John Darrel (London, 1599), 4.
Anon. The trial of Susannah Fowles of Hammersmith, for blaspheming Jesus Christ, and cursing the Lord’s Prayer; and who also pretended to be possest with a devil (London, 1698), 1.
Anna French “Possession, Puritanism and Prophecy: Child Demoniacs and English Reformed Culture,” Reformation 13 (2008): 133–161, 141–142.
See Owen Williams, “Exorcising Madness in Late Elizabethan England: The Seduction of Arthington and the Criminal Culpability of Demoniacs,” Journal of British Studies 47 (2008): 30–52.
Judith Bonzol, “The Medical Diagnosis of Demonic Possession in an Early Modern English Community,” Parergon 26, no. 1 (2009): 130.
For more on Gunter see: Brain. P. Levack “Possession, Witchcraft and Law in Jacobean England,” New Perspectives on Witchcraft, Magic, and Demonology: Witchcraft in the British Isles and New England. ed. Brian P. Levack (New York: Routledge, 2001), 29–57;
James Sharpe, The Bewitching of Anne Gunter: A Horrible and True Story of Deception (New York: Routledge, 2001), esp. 11;
and George Lyman Kittredge, Witchcraft in Old and New England (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1929), 312.
John Darrel, Atrue narration of the strange and grevous vexation by the Devil, of 7. persons in Lancashire, and William Sommers of Nottingham (London, 1600), 20.
On William Sommers, see Marion Gibson, Possession, Puritanism and Print: Darrell, Harsnett, Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Exorcism Controvers y (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2006).
R. J. R. Blair, “Considering Anger from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective,” WIREs Cognitive Science 3 (2012): 65–74, 67.
For more on Swadie, see Jacqueline Pearson, “Dreadful News from Wapping (and Elsewhere): Gender, Reading, and the Supernatural in Early Modern England,” Women’s Writing 17, no. 1 (2010): 6.
E Mayo, The human problems of an industrial civilization (New York: Macmillan, 1933).
Edwards, A Treatise Concerning the Plague and the Pox (London, 1652).
On Agrippa’s representation of the role of the eyes in linking emotion and environment, see Thijs Wessteijn’s “‘Painting’s Enchanting Poison’: Artistic Efficacy and the Transfer of Spirits,” Spirits Unseen: The Representation of Subtle Bodies in Early Modern European Culture, ed. Christine Gottler and Wolfgang Neuber (Leiden: Koninklike Brill, 2008), 141–178, 145–148.
Julie Sievers, “Literatures of Wonder in Early Modern England and America,” Literature Compass 4, no. 3 (2007): 766–783, esp. 771.
Also see, Lorraine Daston and Katharine Park, Wonders and the Order of Nature (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998).
Richard Burton, Anatomy of Melancholy (London, 1621), 84.
J. Sadler, The Sicke Womans Private Looking-glasse (Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, 1636), 137–138.
Jane Sharpe, Midwives Book (London, 1671), Sig. H8.
On the bewitchment scandal, see Thomas Longueville, The Curious Case of Lady Purbeck (New York: Longmans, Green. & Co., 1909), 94–101.
Kenelm Digby, A Late Discourse (London, 1658), 84–85.
For more on this case, see Seth Lobis, “Sir Kenelm Digby and the Power of Sympathy,” Huntington Library Quarterly 74, no. 2 (2011): 243–260, 252.
Kenelm Digby, Of the Sympathetick Powder a Discourse (London, 1657), 185–186.
Craig R. Thompson (ed.), Collected Works of Erasmus: Literary and educational writings. Volume 23 of Collected Works of Erasmus, Desiderius Erasmus (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978), 272.
T. Singer, B. Seymour, J. P. O’Doherty, K. E. Stephan, R. J. Dolan, C. D. Frith, “Empathic Neural Responses Are Modulated by the Perceived Fairness of Others,” Nature 439 (2006): 466–469;
P. L. Jackson, P. Rainville, and J. Decety, “To What Extent Do We Share the Pain of Others? Insight from the Neural Bases of Pain Empathy,” Pain 125 (2006): 5–9.
Grit Hein and Tania Singer, “I Feel How You Feel but Not Always: The Empathic Brain and Its Modulation,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18 (2008): 153–158.
Jean Decety, “Dissecting the Neural Mechanisms Mediating Empathy,” Emotion Review 3 (2011): 92–108, 98.
Also see Vittorio Gallese, “The Roots of Empathy: The Shared Manifold Hypothesis and the Neural Basis of Intersubjectivity” Psychopathology 36 (2003): 171–180. 177–178.
Jean Decety. “A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Model of Human Empathy,” in Social Neuroscience, ed. Eddie Harmon-Jones and Piotr Winkielman (New York: Guildford Press, 2007), 258–259.
Ursula Hess and Sylvie Blairy, “Facial Mimicry and Emotional Contagion to Dynamic Emotional Facial Expressions and Their Influence on Decoding Accuracy,” International Journal of Psychophysiology 40 (2001): 129–141, 129, 130;
Sigal G. Barsade, “The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion in Groups,” Yale SOM Working Paper (October 2000).
Vittorio Gallese, “Intentional Attunement: A Neurophysiological Perspective on Social Cognition and Its Disruption in Autism,” Brain Research 1079 (2006): 15–24, 15.
Janice M Morse and Carl Mitcham, “Compathy: The Contagion of Physical Distress,” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26 (1997): 649–657.
Kenelm Digby, Of the Sympathetick Powder a Discourse (London, 1657), 185–186.
Digby, A Late Discourse (London, 1658), 92–93.
Reginald Scot, Discovery of Witchcraft, Book One, Vol. 17 (London, 1584), 16.
Richard Kirby, Dreadful News from Wapping (London, 1693), 2, 4.
Kathleen R. Sand, An Elizabethan Laywer’s Possession by the Devil: The Story of Robert Brigges (Westport, CT: Preager, 2001), 52–53.
George Moore, A true discourse concerning the certaine possession and dispossession of 7 persons in one familie in Lancashire (London, 1600), 12–14.
Richard Bovet, Pandaemonium (London, 1684), 168–169.
Mary Moore, Wonderfull Newes from the North (London, 1650), 6.
Theodore J. Gaensbauer, “Embodied Simulation, Mirror Neurons, and the Reenactment of Trauma in Early Childhood,” Neuro-Psychoanalysis: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences $113, no. 1 (2011): 91–107, 92–93.
Artin Göncü, “The Development of Intersubjectivity in Social Pretend Play,” Cultural Worlds of Early Childhood, vol 7., ed. Martin Woodhead, Dorothy Faulkner, and Karen Littleton (Norwood, Ablex Publishing Corp, 1987), 123.
Eva Johansson, “Empathy or Intersubjectivity? Understanding the Origins of Morality in Young Children,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (2008): 33–47, 43.
P. L. Harris, E. S. Pasquini, S. Duke, J. J. Asscher, and F. Pons, “Germs and Angels: The Role of Testimony on Young Children’s Ontology,” Developmental Science 9, no. 1 (2006): 76–96.
Theodore J. Gaensbauer, “Embodied Simulation, Mirror Neurons, and the Reenactment of Trauma in Early Childhood,” Neuro-Psychoanalysis: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences $113, no. 1 (2011): 91–107, 113.
David H. Tobey and Michael R. Manning, “Melting the Glacier: Activating Neural Mechanisms to Create Rapid Large-Scale Organizational Change,” ed. Richard Woodman, Professor William Pasmore, Abraham B. (Rami) Shani, Research in Organizational Change and Development 17 (2009): 175–209.
Anon., The Most Strange and Admirable Discoverie of the Three Witches of Warboys (London, 1593).
For more on this account see: A. Cambers, “Demonic Possession: Literacy and ‘Superstition’ in Early Modern England,” Past & Present 202, no. 1 (February 1, 2009): 13–30;
James Sharpe, Witchcraft in Seventeenth-Century Yorkshire: Accusations and Counter Measures Borthwicke Papers 81, Borthwick Institute of Historical Research, University of York, 1992, 7–13;
Marion Gibson, Reading Witchcraft: Stories of Early English Witches (London: Routledge, 1999), 101, 179.
Edward Fairfax, Daemonologia (London, 1621), 33.
Gilbert Geis and Ivan Bunn, A Trial of Witches: A Seventeenth-century Witchcraft Prosecution (London: Routledge, 2005), 71.
Copyright information
© 2015 Kirsten C. Uszkalo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uszkalo, K.C. (2015). Performance | Contamination. In: Bewitched and Bedeviled. Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498229_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498229_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-70252-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49822-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)