Abstract
One of the claims for modern social science is that it infers from facts. Some of this stems from the positivism of Auguste Comte, who argued that there were three stages in the evolution of knowledge — fictions, as in myths; metaphysics, as in speculative philosophy; and scientific theories, based on evidence. Yet Comte qualified claims to know something ‘for a fact’ and warned against assuming to do so rather than allowing for a high degree of scepticism. He submitted that the proper function of intellect was the service of society, was critical of mathematical modelling, claiming that algebra could as readily usurp rather than enhance understanding, and declared that if a theorem was not approached in the same way as a poem, it could deprive us of our humanity (Comte, 1848, 1865; Muglioni, 1996).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Teresa Carla Oliveira
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliveira, T.C. (2015). Who Knows for a Fact?. In: Rethinking Interviewing and Personnel Selection. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137497352_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137497352_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50506-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49735-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)