Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Young People and the Web: Understanding Their Engagement with Online Information through the Concept of Habitus

  • Chapter
Bourdieu, Habitus and Social Research

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the methodological challenges of researching young people’s engagements with digital information and communication technologies (ICTs) for searching and making critical sense of information. Many scholars have problematised what they call the ‘popular rhetoric’ that encouraged us to believe young people were self-taught experts of this technology (see Bayne and Ross, 2011; Cheong, 2008; Hargittai, 2010; Jones and Shao, 2011; Jones and Czerniewicz, 2010; Lee, 2008; Livingstone, 2010; Ng, 2012; Selwyn, 2009). This popular rhetoric is embodied in Prensky’s (2001) concept of the ‘digital native’, which suggested young people were naturalised users of digital ICTs who possessed certain inherent forms of expertise. More specifically, scholars have questioned claims of digital nativity and associated digital sawiness (see Bennett and Maton, 2010; Brouwer, 2006; Cheong, 2008; Graham and Metaxas, 2003; Hargittai, 2010; Helsper and Eynon, 2010; Herring, 2007; Livingstone, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahearn, L. (2001) ‘Language and agency’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 30: 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000) ‘Individuality’ in Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 53–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, S. and J. Ross (2011) ‘“Digital native” and “digital immigrant” discourses’, in R. Land and S. Bayne (Eds), Digital Difference: Perspectives of Online Learning. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, Springer, pp. 159–169.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. and K. Maton (2010) ‘Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5): 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M., J. Frankland, M. Thomas, and K. Robson (2001) Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2007) Sketch for a Self-Analysis, English Ed. (R. Nice, trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, S. (2006) ‘They might be gurus’, Teacher Librarian, 34(1): 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1988) ‘Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory’, Theatre journal, 40(4): 519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, P. H. (2008) ‘The young and techless? Internet use and problem solving behaviors among young adults in Singapore’, New Media and Society, 10(5): 771–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (1st American ed.). New York: Random House USA Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, B. (1996) ‘An introduction to Piene Bourdieu’s “understanding”’, Theory, Culture Sc Society, 13(2): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M. (2009) ‘Applying Bourdieu’s field theory: The case of social capital and education’, Education, Knowledge and Economy, 3(1): 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, C. (1993). Representations of Youth: The Study of Youth and Adolescence in Britain and America. Cambridge: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, M. and G. Argentin (2011) ‘Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students’, New Media & Society, 13(6): 963–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1980). Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–1979. Abington, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2010) ‘Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among Members of the “Net Generation”’, Sociological Inquiry, 80(1): 92–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsper, E.J. and R. Eynon (2010) ‘Digital natives: Where is the evidence?’, British Educational Research Journal, 36(3): 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. C. (2007) ‘Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity’, in The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjørland, B. (2002) ‘Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4): 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. and L. Czerniewicz (2010) ‘Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5): 317–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. and B. Shao (2011) The Net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education Retrieved 21 December 2014, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/evidencenet/net-generation-and-digital-natives.

  • Kelly, P. (2000) ‘Youth as an artefact of expertise: Problematizing the practice of youth studies in an age of uncertainty’, Journal of Youth Studies, 3(3): 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (2008) ‘The impact of young people’s internet use on class boundaries and life trajectories’, Sociology, 42(1): 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesko, N. (2012). Act Your Age!: A Cultural Construction of Adolescence (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesko, N. and S. Talburt (2012) ‘A history of the present youth studies’, in N. Lesko and S. Talburt (Eds), Key Words in Youth Studies. Abington, Oxon: Routledge, pp.11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2007) ‘Internet literacy: Young people’s negotiation of new online opportunities’, in John D. and Catherine T. MacA rthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, pp. 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2010) ‘Digital learning and participation among youth: Critical reflections on future research priorities’, International Journal of Learning and Media, 2(2-3): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2011) ‘Facet methodology: The case for an inventive research orientation’, Methodological Innovations Online, 6(3): 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (1999). ‘Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity’, Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1): 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. and P. T. Metaxas (2003) ‘“Of course it’s true; I saw it on the Internet!”: Critical thinking in the Internet era’, Communications of the ACM, 46(5): 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. and J. Bartlett (2012) ‘“Digital fluency”: Towards young people’s critical use of the Internet’, Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2): 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (1999) ‘Bourdieu, “habitus”, and educational research: Is it all worth the candle?’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2): 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W. (2012) ‘Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?’, Computers & Education, 59(3): 1065–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001) ‘Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1’, On the Horizon, 9(5): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., G. Crozier, and J. Clayton (2009) ‘“Strangers in paradise”? Working-class students in elite universities’, Sociology, 43(6): 1103–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., M. David, and S. Ball (2001) ‘Making a difference?: Institutional habit-uses and higher education choice’, Sociological Research Online, 5(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger, A.J. (2012) ‘Histories’, in N. Lesko and S. Talburt (Eds), Key Words in Youth Studies. Abington, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2014) ‘Freeways, detours, and dead ends: Search journeys among disadvantaged youth’, New Media & Society, 16(2): 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. and E. B. Silva (2013) ‘Field analysis in cultural sociology’, Cultural Sociology, 7(2): 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990) ‘Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3): 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Hardt, S., D. Frey C. Lüthgens, and S. Moscovici (2000) ‘Biased information search in group decision making’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4): 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seat on, E. (2012) ‘Biology/Nature’, in N. Lesko and S. Talburt (Eds), Key Words in Youth Studies. Abington, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2009) ‘The digital native: Myth and reality’, ASLIB Proceedings, 61(4): 364–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. and R. West (2007) ‘Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability’, Thinking & Reasoning, 13(3): 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2006) ‘Pierre Bourdieu’, in R. Stones (Ed.), Key Contemporary Thinkers, London: Macmillan, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Huw Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Strathclyde, UK

    Cristina Costa (Lecturer in Technology Enhanced Learning) (Lecturer in Technology Enhanced Learning)

  2. University of Glasgow, UK

    Mark Murphy (Reader in Education and Public Policy) (Reader in Education and Public Policy)

Copyright information

© 2015 Huw Davies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davies, H. (2015). Young People and the Web: Understanding Their Engagement with Online Information through the Concept of Habitus. In: Costa, C., Murphy, M. (eds) Bourdieu, Habitus and Social Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496928_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation