Advertisement

The Research Interview in Adult Mental Health: Problems and Possibilities for Discourse Studies

  • Julie Hepworth
  • Chris McVittie
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to critically discuss the research interview in adult mental health by examining the ways in which discourse studies can further contribute to the understanding of research practice. Importantly, research practice is conceptualised here as an object of study in itself, in that it produces subjects and has effects. In other words, the practice of using the research interview simultaneously enacts a method of data collection and creates a re-presentation of interviewees’ accounts that reproduce, maintain, or transform dominant psychological thinking about humans and health (or adult mental health). The ways we practise as researchers, therefore, are inseparable from the findings that are produced. In this chapter, we explore existing critical considerations about the research interview, several problems and possibilities that discourse studies encounter in health research, and what implications there are for education and research practice to inform the research interview in adult mental health.

Keywords

Anorexia Nervosa Qualitative Method Research Practice Discourse Analysis Research Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abell, J., Locke, A., Condor, S., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). Trying similarity, doing difference: The role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, S., Stone, M. A., Peters, J. L., Davies, M. J., & Khunti, K. (2006). The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 23(11), 1165–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askew, D. A., Vatcharavongvan, P., Hepworth, J., Williams, G., Jackson, C. L., & Marley, J. (2011). Health status of Thai migrants in Brisbane: Findings from a cross-sectional investigation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 35(6), 574–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. British Psychological Society. (2014). Standards for the accreditation of undergraduate, conversion and integrated Masters programmes in psychology, October 2014. Leicester: British Psychological Society. As retrieved 15 March 2014 from http://www.bps.org.uk /system/files/Public%20files/PaCT/undergraduate_accreditation_2014_web.pdf.
  5. Comer, R., Gould, E., & Furnham, A. (Eds.) (2013). Psychology. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Condor, S., Figgou, L., Abell, J., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). ‘They’re not racist... ’ Prejudice denial, mitigation and suppression in dialogue. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cresswell, J. (2014). Research design (4th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Fryer, D. (1987). Monmouthshire and marienthal: Sociographies of two unemployed communities. In D. Fryer & P. Ullah (Eds.), Unemployed people: Social and psychological perspectives (pp. 1–73). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fryer, D., & McCormack, C. (2012). The war without bullets: Socio-structural violence from a critical standpoint. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 3(1), 88–92.Google Scholar
  10. Funk, L. M., & Stajduhar, K. I. (2009). Interviewing family caregivers: Implications of the caregiving context for the research interview. Qualitative Health Research, 19(6), 859–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghane, S., Kolk, A. M., & Emmelkamp, P. M.G. (2010). Assessment of explanatory models of mental illness: Effects of patient and interviewer characteristics. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(2), 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffin, C. (2007). Being dead and being there: Research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing ‘naturally occurring data’. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 246–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —. (2012). Looking beyond the text: Some reflections on the challenges of engaging with feminist conversation analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvastii, A. B., & McKinney, K.D. (Eds.) (2012). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hepburn, A. (2000). On the alleged incompatibility between relativism and feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 10(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hepworth, J. (1999). Gender and the capacity of women with NIDDM to implement medical advice. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 27(4), 260–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hepworth, J., Askew, D., Jackson, C., & Russell, A. (2012). ‘Working with the team’: An exploratory study of improved type 2 diabetes management in a new model of integrated primary/secondary care. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19(3), 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.) (2003). Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Hugh-Jones, S., Madill, A., Gibson, S., Keane, K., & Beestin, L. (2012). A national survey of qualitative research methods teaching in UK HE psychology departments. Leeds: University of Leeds. As retrieved 17 February 2015 at: http://www.academia.edu/8483353 /HughJones_S._Madill_A._et_al._2012_._A_national_survey_of_qualitative_research _methods_teaching_in_UK_HE_psychology_departments._QMiP_Report.Google Scholar
  20. Kirkwood, S., McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2013). ‘They’re more than animals’: Refugees’ accounts of racially motivated violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 747–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2008). Social psychology and discourse. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —. (2011). Identities in context: Individuals and discourse in action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McVittie, C., Cavers, D., & Hepworth, J., (2005). Femininity, mental weakness, and difference: Male students account for anorexia nervosa in males. Sex Roles, 53(5/6), 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McVittie, C., McKinlay, A., Della Sala, S., & Macpherson, S. (2014). The dog that didn’t growl: The interactional negotiation of momentary confabulations. Memory, 22(7), 824–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miczo, N. (2003). Beyond the ‘Fetishism of Words’: Considerations on the use of the interview to gather chronic illness narratives. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishler, E. (1984). The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of medicalinterviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  27. Mallozzi, C.A. (2009). Voicing the interview. A researcher’s exploration on a platform of empathy. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(6), 1042–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. —. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (2nd edition) (pp. 555–570). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Radley, A. R. (1994). Making sense of illness. The social psychology of health and disease. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Radley, A., & Billig, M. (1996). Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18(2), 220–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rapley, T. (2001). The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analyzing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roulston, K. (2010). Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research, 10(2), 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roulston, K., deMarrais, K., & Lewis, J. B. (2003). Learning to interview in the social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 643–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seymour-Smith, S., & Wetherell, M. (2006). ‘What he hasn’t told you...’: Investigating the micro-politics of gendered support in heterosexual couples’ co-constructed accounts of illness. Feminism & Psychology, 16(1), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siddiqui, S. (2014). Depression in type 2 diabetes mellitus — A brief review. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 8(1), 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Speer, S. A. (2012). Feminist conversation analysis: who needs it? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 292–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stokoe, E. (2010). ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse & Society, 21(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suzuki, L. A., Ahluwalia, M. K., Arora, A. K., & Mattis, J. S. (2007). The pond you fish in determines the fish you catch: Exploring strategies for qualitative data collection. Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Talmy, S. (2011). The interview as collaborative achievement: Interaction, identity, and ideology in a speech event. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tang, N. (2002). Interviewer and interviewee relationships between women. Sociology, 36(3), 703–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, B., & Francis, K. (2013). Qualitative research in the health sciences. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2010). Gloucester: The quality assurance agency for higher education. As retrieved 11 December 2014 at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Psychology.pdf.
  45. Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2011). Ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative research [85 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2), Art. 30, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn::nbn:de0114-fqs0902307.
  46. Weatherall, A. (2012). Conversation analysis as feminist research: A response to Whelan. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whelan, P. (2012). Glossing conversation analysis with feminism? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended reading

  1. • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research (2nd edition) (pp. 555–570). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. • Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2011). Ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative research [85 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2), Art. 30, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn::nbn:de0114-fqs0902307.

Copyright information

© Julie Hepworth and Chris McVittie 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Hepworth
  • Chris McVittie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations