Abstract
Research has generated considerable knowledge about the prevalence, nature, and consequences of abuse of women by their male partners. Specifying what constitutes intimate partner violence (IPV) is still controversial however (e.g. Adams, Sullivan, Bybee, & Greeson, 2008; Fawole, 2008; Follingstad & Bush, 2014; Hines & Malley-Morrison, 2001; Johnson, Leone, & Xu, 2014; Statistics Canada, 2011), and the predominant line of research has served to increase the complexity by adding categories and subcategories. Within a social constructionist and discursive framework, the instability of meanings becomes a topic for research, and a productive line of inquiry is to explore the meaning of IPV within a specific social context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, A. E., Sullivan, C. M., Bybee, D., & Greeson, M. R. (2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women, 14, 563–588.
Adams, P. J., Town, A., & Gavey, N. (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women. Discourse and Society, 6(3), 387–406.
Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendered violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15(3), 358–380.
Augusta-Scott, T. (2007). Conversations with men about women’s violence: Ending men’s violence by challenging gender essentialism. In C. Brown & T. Augusta-Scott (Eds.), Narrative therapy: Making meaning, making lives (pp. 197–210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Boonzaier, F. (2008). ‘If the man says you must sit, then you must sit’: The relational con-struction of woman abuse: Gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism & Psychology, 18(2), 183–206.
Boonzaier, F., & de la Rey, C. (2003). ‘He’s a man, and I’m a woman’: Cultural constructions of masculinity and femininity in South African women’s narratives of violence. Violence Against Women, 9(8), 1003–1029.
Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2004). Telling it like is isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse and Society, 15(5), 499–526.
Connell, R. W. (1996). The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society, 22, 597–623.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1364–1389.
Davis, R. E. (2002). ‘The strongest women’: Exploration of the inner resources of abused women. Qualitative Health Research, 12(9), 1248–1263.
DeKeseredy, W. S. (2006). Future directions. Violence against women, 12, 1078–1095.
Dunn, J. L. (2005). ‘Victims’ and ‘Survivors’: Emerging vocabularies of motives for ‘Battered Women Who Stay’. Sociological Inquiry, 75, 1–30.
Edin, K. E., Lalos, A., Hogberg, U., & Dahlgren, L. (2008). Violent men: Ordinary and deviant. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(2), 225–244.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Fawole, O. I. (2008). Economic violence to women and girls: Is it receiving the necessary attention? Trauma Violence Abuse, 9(3), 167–177.
Follingstad, D. R., & Bush, H. M. (2014). Measurement of intimate partner violence: A model for developing the gold standard. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 369–383.
Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hamberger, L. K. (2005). Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples: Toward a gender-sensitive analysis. Violence and Victims, 20(2), 131–151.
Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2001). Psychological effects of partner abuse against men: A neglected research area. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 75–85.
Hyden, M. (2005). ‘I must have been an idiot to let it go on’: Agency and positioning in battered women’s narratives of leaving. Feminism & Psychology, 15(2), 169–188.
Jackson, S. (1999). Issues in the dating violence research: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4, 233–247.
—. (2001). Happily never after: Young women’s stories of abuse in heterosexual love relationships. Feminism & Psychology, 11(3), 305–321.
Johnson, M. P. (2005). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender — Or is it?. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1126–1130.
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.
Johnson, M. P., Leone, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2014). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207.
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 467–499.
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). ‘Gender symmetry’ in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332–1363.
Kurri, K., & Wahlstrom, J. (2001). Dialogical management of morality in domestic violence counselling. Feminism & Psychology, 11(2), 187–208.
Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims (pp. 108–138). New York: New York University Press.
Lea, S., & Auburn, T. (2001). The social construction of rape in the talk of a convicted rapist. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 11–33.
LeCouteur, A., & Oxland, M. (2011). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators’ talk. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 5–28.
Lehmann, M., & Santilli, N. R. (1996). Sex differences in perceptions of spousal abuse. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 229–238.
Leisenring, A. (2006). Confronting ‘victim’ discourses: The identity work of battered women. Symbolic Interaction, 29, 307–330.
McKelley, R. A. (2007). Men’s resistance to seeking help: Using individual psychology to understand counseling-reluctant men. Journal of Individual Psychology, 63(1), 48–58.
Migliaccio, T. A. (2002). Abused husbands: A narrative analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 26–52.
Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339–1376.
Noone, J. H., & Stephens, C. (2008). Men, masculine identities, and health care utilization. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30, 711–725.
O’Brien, R., Hunt, K., & Hart, G. (2005). ‘It’s caveman stuff, but that is to a certain extent how guys still operate’: Men’s accounts of masculinity and help seeking. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 503–516.
Potter, J. (1996). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods (pp. 125–140). Leicester: BPS Books.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem: A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8, 1424–1448.
Seamans, C. L., Rubin, L. J., & Stabb, S. D. (2007). Women domestic violence offenders: Lessons of violence and survival. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 8(2), 47–68.
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Statistics Canada. (2011). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2011. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
Stobbe, L. (2005). Doing machismo: Legitimating speech acts as a selection discourse. Gender, Work, and Organization, 12(2), 105–123.
Straus, M. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arraiga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
—. (2005). Women’s violence toward men is a serious social problem. In D. Loseke, R. J. Gelles, & M. M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd edition) (pp. 55–77). London: Sage.
—. (2012). Blaming the messenger for the bad news about partner violence by women: The methodological, theoretical, and value basis of the purported invalidity of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 538–556.
Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286–319.
—. (2006). The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1026–1045.
Todd, N., & Wade, A. (2004). Coming to terms with violence and resistance: From a language of effects to a language of responses. In T. Strong & D. Pare (Eds.), Furthering talk: Advances in the discursive therapies (pp.145–161). New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum.
Towns, A., & Adams, P. (2009). Staying quiet or getting out: Some ideological dilemmas faced by women who experience violence from male partners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 735–754.
Tutty, L. (1999). Husband abuse: An overview of research and perspectives. Ottawa, ON: National Clearinghouse on Family Violence.
Wade, A. (1997). Small acts of living: Everyday resistance to violence and other forms of oppression. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 19, 23–40.
—. (2000). Resistance to interpersonal violence: Implications for the practice of therapy, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.
Williston, C, & Wood, L. A. (2009). Maybe abuse: Characterizations of intimate partner violence in an online support group (Unpublished thesis). University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Wood, J. T. (2004). Monsters and victims: Male felons’ accounts of intimate partner violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(5), 555–576.
Zverina, M., Stam, H. J., & Babins-Wagner, R. (2011). Managing victim status in group therapy: A discourse analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(14), 284–2855.
Recommended reading
• Follingstad, D. R., & Bush, H. M. (2014). Measurement of intimate partner violence: A model for developing the gold standard. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 369–383.
• Todd, N., & Wade, A. (2004). Coming to terms with violence and resistance: from a language of effects to a language of responses. In T. Strong & D. Pare (Eds.), Furthering talk: Advances in the discursive therapies (pp. 145–161). New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Henderikus J. Stam, Michaela Zverina, H. Lorraine Radtke, and Robbie Babins-Wagner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stam, H.J., Zverina, M., Radtke, H.L., Babins-Wagner, R. (2016). Discourses of Abuse and Recovery: Talking about Domestic Violence and Its Implications for Therapy. In: O’Reilly, M., Lester, J.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_34
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69789-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49685-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)