Skip to main content

Discourses of Abuse and Recovery: Talking about Domestic Violence and Its Implications for Therapy

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health

Abstract

Research has generated considerable knowledge about the prevalence, nature, and consequences of abuse of women by their male partners. Specifying what constitutes intimate partner violence (IPV) is still controversial however (e.g. Adams, Sullivan, Bybee, & Greeson, 2008; Fawole, 2008; Follingstad & Bush, 2014; Hines & Malley-Morrison, 2001; Johnson, Leone, & Xu, 2014; Statistics Canada, 2011), and the predominant line of research has served to increase the complexity by adding categories and subcategories. Within a social constructionist and discursive framework, the instability of meanings becomes a topic for research, and a productive line of inquiry is to explore the meaning of IPV within a specific social context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, A. E., Sullivan, C. M., Bybee, D., & Greeson, M. R. (2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women, 14, 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, P. J., Town, A., & Gavey, N. (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women. Discourse and Society, 6(3), 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendered violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15(3), 358–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augusta-Scott, T. (2007). Conversations with men about women’s violence: Ending men’s violence by challenging gender essentialism. In C. Brown & T. Augusta-Scott (Eds.), Narrative therapy: Making meaning, making lives (pp. 197–210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boonzaier, F. (2008). ‘If the man says you must sit, then you must sit’: The relational con-struction of woman abuse: Gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism & Psychology, 18(2), 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonzaier, F., & de la Rey, C. (2003). ‘He’s a man, and I’m a woman’: Cultural constructions of masculinity and femininity in South African women’s narratives of violence. Violence Against Women, 9(8), 1003–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2004). Telling it like is isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse and Society, 15(5), 499–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1996). The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society, 22, 597–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1364–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. E. (2002). ‘The strongest women’: Exploration of the inner resources of abused women. Qualitative Health Research, 12(9), 1248–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKeseredy, W. S. (2006). Future directions. Violence against women, 12, 1078–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. L. (2005). ‘Victims’ and ‘Survivors’: Emerging vocabularies of motives for ‘Battered Women Who Stay’. Sociological Inquiry, 75, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K. E., Lalos, A., Hogberg, U., & Dahlgren, L. (2008). Violent men: Ordinary and deviant. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(2), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawole, O. I. (2008). Economic violence to women and girls: Is it receiving the necessary attention? Trauma Violence Abuse, 9(3), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., & Bush, H. M. (2014). Measurement of intimate partner violence: A model for developing the gold standard. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K. (2005). Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples: Toward a gender-sensitive analysis. Violence and Victims, 20(2), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2001). Psychological effects of partner abuse against men: A neglected research area. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, M. (2005). ‘I must have been an idiot to let it go on’: Agency and positioning in battered women’s narratives of leaving. Feminism & Psychology, 15(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (1999). Issues in the dating violence research: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2001). Happily never after: Young women’s stories of abuse in heterosexual love relationships. Feminism & Psychology, 11(3), 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (2005). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender — Or is it?. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1126–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., Leone, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2014). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 467–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2002). ‘Gender symmetry’ in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurri, K., & Wahlstrom, J. (2001). Dialogical management of morality in domestic violence counselling. Feminism & Psychology, 11(2), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims (pp. 108–138). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, S., & Auburn, T. (2001). The social construction of rape in the talk of a convicted rapist. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCouteur, A., & Oxland, M. (2011). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators’ talk. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, M., & Santilli, N. R. (1996). Sex differences in perceptions of spousal abuse. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisenring, A. (2006). Confronting ‘victim’ discourses: The identity work of battered women. Symbolic Interaction, 29, 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelley, R. A. (2007). Men’s resistance to seeking help: Using individual psychology to understand counseling-reluctant men. Journal of Individual Psychology, 63(1), 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migliaccio, T. A. (2002). Abused husbands: A narrative analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 26–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noone, J. H., & Stephens, C. (2008). Men, masculine identities, and health care utilization. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30, 711–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R., Hunt, K., & Hart, G. (2005). ‘It’s caveman stuff, but that is to a certain extent how guys still operate’: Men’s accounts of masculinity and help seeking. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods (pp. 125–140). Leicester: BPS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem: A review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8, 1424–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seamans, C. L., Rubin, L. J., & Stabb, S. D. (2007). Women domestic violence offenders: Lessons of violence and survival. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 8(2), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2011). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2011. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobbe, L. (2005). Doing machismo: Legitimating speech acts as a selection discourse. Gender, Work, and Organization, 12(2), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1999). The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In X. B. Arraiga & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 17–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2005). Women’s violence toward men is a serious social problem. In D. Loseke, R. J. Gelles, & M. M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (2nd edition) (pp. 55–77). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2012). Blaming the messenger for the bad news about partner violence by women: The methodological, theoretical, and value basis of the purported invalidity of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 538–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, S. C., & Snow, D. L. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 286–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2006). The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1026–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, N., & Wade, A. (2004). Coming to terms with violence and resistance: From a language of effects to a language of responses. In T. Strong & D. Pare (Eds.), Furthering talk: Advances in the discursive therapies (pp.145–161). New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Towns, A., & Adams, P. (2009). Staying quiet or getting out: Some ideological dilemmas faced by women who experience violence from male partners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutty, L. (1999). Husband abuse: An overview of research and perspectives. Ottawa, ON: National Clearinghouse on Family Violence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, A. (1997). Small acts of living: Everyday resistance to violence and other forms of oppression. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 19, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (2000). Resistance to interpersonal violence: Implications for the practice of therapy, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williston, C, & Wood, L. A. (2009). Maybe abuse: Characterizations of intimate partner violence in an online support group (Unpublished thesis). University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T. (2004). Monsters and victims: Male felons’ accounts of intimate partner violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(5), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zverina, M., Stam, H. J., & Babins-Wagner, R. (2011). Managing victim status in group therapy: A discourse analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(14), 284–2855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Recommended reading

  • • Follingstad, D. R., & Bush, H. M. (2014). Measurement of intimate partner violence: A model for developing the gold standard. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • • Todd, N., & Wade, A. (2004). Coming to terms with violence and resistance: from a language of effects to a language of responses. In T. Strong & D. Pare (Eds.), Furthering talk: Advances in the discursive therapies (pp. 145–161). New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Henderikus J. Stam, Michaela Zverina, H. Lorraine Radtke, and Robbie Babins-Wagner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stam, H.J., Zverina, M., Radtke, H.L., Babins-Wagner, R. (2016). Discourses of Abuse and Recovery: Talking about Domestic Violence and Its Implications for Therapy. In: O’Reilly, M., Lester, J.N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics