Advertisement

Using Discourse and Conversation Analysis to Study Clinical Practice in Adult Mental Health

  • Nikki Kiyimba
Chapter

Abstract

The discipline of clinical psychology has emerged from a largely positivist approach to understanding human behaviour (Kiyimba, 2015), and applied research for clinical psychologists has, for the most part, followed the quantitative tradition. Psychology, in the wider sense, historically positioned itself within the sciences, and as such the quantitative approach to measuring phenomena has tended to predominate (Peters, 2010). Thus, the move towards using qualitative approaches within psychological research has been relatively recent, despite the rich pedigree of this paradigm (Howitt, 2010). One of the aspects of this new appreciation of qualitative research has been an acknowledgement of the important role that understanding the processes in therapeutic encounters plays. This line of enquiry has facilitated an integration of the scientific ideals of good-quality research with actual clinical practice (Rhodes, 2011).

Keywords

Mental Health Psychological Therapy Mental Health Setting Conversation Analysis Therapeutic Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental Disorders (5th edition). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Antaki, C., & Jahoda, A. (2010). Psychotherapists’ practices in keeping a session ‘on-track’ in the face of clients’ ‘off-track’ talk. Communication & Medicine, 7(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold L. (2002). Assessing professional behaviour: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Academic Medicine, 77(6), 502–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkham, M., & Margison, F. (2007). Practice-based evidence as a complement to evidence-based practice: From dichotomy to chiasmus. In Chris Freeman & Mick Power (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based psychotherapies: A guide for research and practice (pp. 443–476). West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., & McGrath, G. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(2), 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barkham, M., & Mellor-Clarke, J. (2000). Rigour and relevance: Practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. In N. Rowland & S. Goss (Eds.), Evidence-based counselling and psychological therapies (pp. 127–144). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. —. (2003). Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: Developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10(6), 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bower, P. (2003). Efficacy in evidence-based practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10(6), 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, J., Dreis, S., & Nace, D. K. (1999). What really makes a difference in psychotherapy outcome? Why does managed care want to know? In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 389–406). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, C., & Lloyd, K. (2001). Qualitative methods in psychiatric research. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7(5), 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burck, C. (2005). Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research:The use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 27(3), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chwalisz, K. (2003). Evidence-based practice: A framework for twenty-first-century scientist-practitioner training. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(5), 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
  15. Drake, R. E., Goldman, H. H., Leff, H. S., Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L., Mueser, K. T., & Torrey, W. C. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 52(2), 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (2005). Treatment manuals do not improve outcomes. In J. Norcross, L. Beutler, & R. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions (pp. 140–148). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, Chris, Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9(3), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmes, J., & Lindley, R. (1998). The values of psychotherapy. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  19. Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51(10), 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howitt, D. (2010). Introduction to qualitative methods in psychology. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Imel, Z., & Wampold, B. (2008). The importance of treatment and the science of common factors in psychotherapy. In S. Brown & R. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 249–262). Hoboken, NJ: John Benjamin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  22. Kemp, P. (2013). Empowering the supporters: Enhancing the role of unqualified support workers in a housing scheme for people with mental health problems. In C. Munn-Giddings & R. Winter (Eds.), A handbook for action research in health and social care (pp. 88–101). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kiyimba, N. (2015). The value of discourse analysis: A clinical psychologist’s view. In M. O’Reilly & J. N. Lester (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of child mental health: Discourse and conversation studies. (pp. 42–58). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  24. Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th edition) (pp. 139–193). New York: Wiley Press.Google Scholar
  25. —. (2009). Using clinical significance in psychotherapy outcome research: The need for a common procedure and validity data. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lampropoulos, G. K., Goldfried, M. R., Castonguay, L. G., Lambert, M. J., Stiles, W. B., & Nestoros, J. N. (2002). What kind of research can we realistically expect from the practitioner? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(10), 1241–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lester, J. N., & O’Reilly, M. (2015). Is evidence-based practice a threat to the progress of the qualitative community? Arguments from the bottom of the pyramid. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 628–632. doi: 1077800414563808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lutz, W., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, S. C., Tschitsaz, A., Schürch, E., & Stulz, N. (2006). The probability of treatment success, failure and duration – What can be learned from empirical data to support decision making in clinical practice? Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13(4), 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maletzky, B. M. (1981). Clinical relevance and clinical research. Behavioural Assessment, 3, 282–288.Google Scholar
  30. Mamede, S., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). The structure of reflective practice in medicine. Medical Education, 38(12), 1302–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinez, C., Tomicic, A., & Medina, L. (2012). Dialogic discourse analysis of psychothera-peutic dialogue: microanalysis of relevant psychotherapy episodes. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 6(1), 99–121.Google Scholar
  32. Margison, F., Barkham, M., Evans, C., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., Audin, K., & Conell, J. (2000). Measurement and psychotherapy: Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(2), 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGlinchey, J. B., Atkins, D. C., & Jacobson, N. S. (2002). Clinical significance methods: Which one to use and how useful are they? Behavior Therapy, 33(4), 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, S. D., Duncan, B., & Hubble, M. (2008). Supershrinks: What is the secret of their success? Psychotherapy in Australia, 14(4), 14.Google Scholar
  35. National Advisory Mental Health Council, National Institute of Mental Health (1999). Bridging science and service: A report by the National Advisory Mental Health Council’s Clinical Treatment and Services Research Workgroup (NIH Publication No. 99–4353). Washington, DC: National Institute of Health.Google Scholar
  36. NHS Executive. (1996). NHS psychotherapy services in England: Review of strategic policy. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  37. NICE (2012). Process and methods guides: The guidelines manual. As retrieved on 24 April 2015 from http://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg6/chapter/1-Introduction.Google Scholar
  38. Okiishi, J., Lambert, M. J., Nielsen, S. L., & Ogles, B. M. (2003). Waiting for supershrink: An empirical analysis of therapist effects. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10(6), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1986). Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (pp. 311–385). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Öster, I., Magnusson, E., Thyme, K. E., Lindh, J., & Åström, S. (2007). Art therapy for women with breast cancer: The therapeutic consequences of boundary strengthening. The Arts in Psychotherapy 34(3), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parry, G. (2000). Evidence-based psychotherapy: An overview. In N. Rowland & S. Goss (Eds.), Evidence-based counselling and psychological therapies (pp. 57–75). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Peters, S. (2010). Qualitative research methods in mental health. Evidence Based Mental Health, 13(2), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reyes, L., Aristegui, R., Krause, M., Strasser, K., Tomicic, A., Valdes, N., & Ben-Dov, P. (2008). Language and therapeutic change: A speech acts analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18(3), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rhodes, P. (2011). Why clinical psychology needs process research: An examination of four methodologies. Clinical Child Psychology 17(4), 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ricks, D. F. (1974). Supershrink: Methods of a therapist judged successful on the basis of adult outcomes of adolescent patients. In D. F. Ricks & M. Roff (Eds.), Life history research in psychopathology (pp. 275–297). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rowan, J. (1992). In a response to, Mair, K. The myth of therapist expertise. In W. Dryden & C. Feltham (Eds.), Psychotherapy and its discontents (pp. 160–166). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312 (7023), 71–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schegloff, E. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question’. Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4), 104–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Stiefel, I., Renner, P., & Riordan, D. (2003). Evidence-based: Crossing the great divide between research and clinical practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy24, 49–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sutherland, O., & Strong, T. (2011). Therapeutic collaboration: A conversation analysis of constructionist therapy. Journal of Family Therapy33(3), 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swick, H.M. (2000). Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Academic Medicine, 75, 612–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 9(3), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams, D. D. R., & Garner, J. (2002). The case against ‘the evidence’: A different perspective on evidence-based medicine. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(1), 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. World Health Organization. (1992). ICD-10 classifications of mental and behavioural disorder: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Recommended reading

  1. • Antaki, C, & Jahoda, A. (2009). Psychotherapists’ practices in keeping a session ‘on-track’ in the face of clients ‘off-track’ talk. Communication & Medicine, 7(1), 11–21.Google Scholar
  2. • Lester, J., and O’Reilly, M. (2015). Is evidence-based practice a threat to the progress of the qualitative community? Arguments from the bottom of the pyramid. [Special issue; 20th Anniversary edition] Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 628–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. • Martinez, C, Tomicic, A., & Medina, L. (2012). Dialogic discourse analysis of psychotherapeutic dialogue: Microanalysis of relevant psychotherapy episodes. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 6(1), 99–121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nikki Kiyimba 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikki Kiyimba

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations