Advertisement

Diagnosing as an Interactional Achievement in Psychiatric Interviews

  • Carles Roca-Cuberes
Chapter
  • 983 Downloads

Abstract

What is involved in exploring a patient’s mental state? How is a diagnosis or a decision about a patient’s psychopathological status accomplished? How do psychiatrists make patients talk about their problems? The first encounter, in a psychiatric hospital, between a psychiatrist and the prospective patient is quite significant for the fate of the latter. In a psychiatric intake interview (PII) the psychiatrist’s official task is to determine whether a person should be hospitalised – voluntarily or involuntarily – as a patient on the basis of the person’s observable behaviour during the interview. Customarily, this implies that the psychiatrist needs to solicit the patient to talk about the problems that brought him/her to hospital and make a decision regarding the candidate patient’s mental state. In the other type of psychiatric interview, the subsequent psychiatric interview, the psychiatrist’s assignment is to monitor the behavioural progress of a psychiatric in-patient, with the view to a possible future discharge. For example, in the adult psychiatric treatment interview, psychiatrists are charged with asking questions of the patients with appropriate depth and pace (Thompson & McCabe, Chapter 20, this volume).

Keywords

Immigrant Worker Candidate Patient Mental Health Practice Abuse Wife Discursive Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis of psychotherapy (pp. 26–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 627–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antaki, C., & Jahoda, A. (2010). Psychotherapists’ practices in keeping a session ‘on-track’ in the face of clients’ ‘off-track’ talk. Communication & Medicine, 7(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antaki, C., & O’Reilly, M. (2014). Either/or questions in child psychiatric assessments: The effect of the seriousness and order of the alternatives. Discourse Studies, 16(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckwith, A., & Crichton, J. (2009). The negotiation of the problem statement in cognitive behavioural therapy. Communication & Medicine, 7(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
  6. Bergmann, J. R. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 137–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coulter, J. (1979). The Social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, K. (1986). The process of problem (re) formulation in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 8(1), 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekberg, S., Barnes, R. K., Kessler, D. S., Malpass, A. and Shaw, A. R. G. (2014). Managing clients’ expectations at the outset of online cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression. Health Expectations. doi: 10.1111/hex.12227.Google Scholar
  10. Healey, P. G. T., Colman, M., & Thirlwell, M. (2005). Analysing multi-modal communication: Repair based measures of human communicative co-ordination. In J. Van Kuppevelt, L. Dybkjaer, & N. Bernsen (Eds.), Current and new directions in Discourse and dialogue (pp. 113–129). London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Heath, C. (1992). The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general practice consultation. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 235–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Holstein, J. A. (1993). Court-ordered insanity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jefferson, G., &. Lee, J. R. E. (1992). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 521–548). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kurri, K., & Wahlström, J. (2007). Reformulations of agentless talk in psychotherapy. Text & Talk, 27(3), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Labov, W., & Walletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  17. O’Neill, K., & LeCouteur, A. (2013). Naming the problem: a membership categorization analysis study of family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 36(3), 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Reilly, M., Karim, K., Stafford, V., and Hutchby, V. (2014). Identifying the interactional processes in the first assessments in child mental health. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, doi: 10.1111/camh.12077.Google Scholar
  19. Peräkylä, A. (1995). AIDS counselling: Institutional interaction and clinical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rae, J. (2008). Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis of psychotherapy (pp. 62–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roca-Cuberes, C. (2008). Membership categorization and professional insanity ascription. Discourse Studies, 10(4), 543–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —. (2011). Making psychotherapy visible: a conversation analytic study of some interactional devices employed in psychiatric interviews. Text & Talk, 31(2), 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sacks, H. (1974). On the analyzability of stories by children. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 216–232). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. —. (1992). In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation, Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, H. (1976). On recognizing mistakes: A case ofpractical reasoning in psychotherapy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 6(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Themistocleous, M., McCabe, R., Rees, N., Hassan, I., Healey, P. G. T., & Priebe, S. (2009). Establishing mutual understanding in interaction: An analysis of conversational repair in psychiatric consultations. Communication & Medicine, 6(2), 165–176.Google Scholar
  27. Watson, D. R. (1990). Some features of the elicitation of confessions in murder interrogations. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 263–296). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Weiste, E., & Peräkylä, A. (2013). A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended reading

  1. • Fitzgerald, P. (2013). Therapy talk: Conversation analysis in practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. • Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C, Vehviläinen, S., & Leudar, I. (Eds.) (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Carles Roca-Cuberes 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carles Roca-Cuberes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations