Skip to main content

The Emergence of the ‘Private’ Theatres, 1600–1625

  • Chapter
  • 117 Accesses

Part of the book series: Early Modern Literature in History ((EMLH))

Abstract

Chapter 2 examines in detail the arguments advanced by theatre historians to explain why early seventeenth-century indoor playhouses were described as ‘private’. It exposes unsupportable claims that the term was used to circumvent censorship: in fact, the plays bearing ‘private’ on their title pages were censored by the Master of the Revels. The chapter demonstrates that the term had a much wider range of meanings than theatre historians have acknowledged. It resists generalised claims and instead charts the various ways in which both ‘public’ and ‘private’ were used throughout the Jacobean period, thereby attesting to their significance and complexity. In doing this, it considers title page advertisements and offers new ways of thinking about how playbooks and theatre spaces were marketed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Peter W.M. Blayney, ‘The Publication of Playbooks’, in A New History of Early English Drama, ed. by John D. Cox and David Scott Kastan (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997), pp. 383–422.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert S. Miola, ‘Creating the Author: Jonson’s Latin Epigraphs’, Ben Jonson Journal, 6 (1999), 35–48. Miola makes clear that the Latin mottos on Jonson title pages ‘certainly seem’ to be authorial, even if the other title page features are not (36).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roslyn Lander Knutson, Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare’s Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 103–126.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. For objections to the argument, see R.A. Foakes, ‘Book Review: Roslyn Lander Knutson. Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare’s Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001’, Early Theatre, 6 (2003), 119–121 (120).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. On the text, and Burre’s specialism as a printer of theatrically unsuccessful plays, see Zachary Lesser, ‘Walter Burre’s The Knight of the Burning Pestle’, ELR, 29 (1999), 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chambers, Elizabethan Stage, vol. 4, p. 271; Alfred Harbage, Annals of English Drama, 975–1700, rev. S. Schoenbaum (London: Methuen, 1964), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Eoin Price

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Price, E. (2015). The Emergence of the ‘Private’ Theatres, 1600–1625. In: ‘Public’ and ‘Private’ Playhouses in Renaissance England: The Politics of Publication. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137494924_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics