Skip to main content

Arctic Governance and the Relevance of History

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

Abstract

In discussion of current issues, the relevance of history is too often ignored or disregarded as insignificant. Yet in the case of Arctic governance in North America, there are sufficient similarities to previous challenges to warrant closer examination. A cursory glance reveals a number of circumstances which precipitated changes in ownership or authority, such as an abrupt change in climate; wars and economic adversity; technological advances and increased demand for Arctic resources. In varying degrees, all are present today. History also reveals that the greatest threat to Arctic sovereignty was loss of control over the adjacent waters and major sea routes.1 Equally significant are differences in demography, cultural traditions, local economies, and political institutions which become self-evident when comparing the histories of Alaska, Arctic Canada, and Greenland. Admittedly, there are obvious similarities in climate, geography, marine life, flora, and fauna, but human factors are critical to understanding the need for tolerance and compromise in devising policies acceptable to all regions. Although cooperation among the Arctic countries has been enhanced by success of the Arctic Council, increasing competition for the region’s resources could become a divisive factor if accompanied by a threat to authority over adjacent waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. S. D. Grant (2010) Polar Imperative: The History of Arctic Sovereignty in North America (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre), p. 404. Although most historical data in this paper is found in this publication, other references are added to provide more details.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. J. Theutenberg (1984) ‘Mare Clausum et Mare Liberum’, Arctic, 37:4, 481–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 11–14; for more detailed information, see M. Byers (2013) International Law and the Arctic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. and D. R. Rothwell (1996) The Polar Regions and the Development of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 15–17; T. Berger (1991) A Long and Terrible Shadow: White Values, Native Rights in the Americas, 1492–1992 (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre), pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 30–40; see also R. McGhee (2005) The Last Imaginary Place: A Human History of the Arctic (Toronto: Key Porter);

    Google Scholar 

  7. and P. Schlederman (1996) Crossroads to Greenland: 3000 Years of Prehistory in the Eastern Arctic (Calgary: Arctic Institute of North America).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 40–51. For more details about the Norse settlements, see F. Gadd (1970) The History of Greenland, vol. 1 (London: C. Hurst and Company);

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Seaver (1996) The Frozen Echo: Greenland and the Exploration of North America, 1000–1500 AD (Stanford: Stanford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Sigurdsson (2000) Vikings in the New World (Reykjavik: Culture House);

    Google Scholar 

  11. and a somewhat controversial interpretation by J. Diamond (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (Toronto: Penguin Books), pp. 211–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 81–6, 148–52, and 181; see also L. Bobé (1953) Hans Egede: Colonizer and Missionary of Greenland (Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger);

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Gadd (1970) History of Greenland, vol. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Haycox (2006) Alaska: An American Colony (Seattle: University of Washington Press), pp. 177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 86–91 and 118–23; P. A. Tikhamenev (1978) A History of the Russian-American Company (Seattle: University of Washington Press).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 97–114. Aside from the published journals by British Admiralty officers, see Captain F. E. McClintock (reprint 2012) The Voyage of the ‘Fox’ in the Arctic Seas, 3rd edn (Vancouver: Touchwood Books);

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Fleming (1998) Barrow’s Boys: The Original Extreme British Exploration Adventurers (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press);

    Google Scholar 

  18. and Glyn Williams (2009) Arctic Labyrinth: The Quest for the Northwest Passage (Toronto: Viking Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 162–3 and 168–72; for details on American explorations, see M. F. Robinson (2006) The Coldest Crucible: Arctic Exploration and American Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. S. R. Bown (2012) The Last Viking: The Life of Roald Amundsen (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 115–33; see also G. G. Van Deusen (1967) William Henry Seward (New York: Oxford University Press), and for American expansionism,

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. R. Hietala (2003) Manifest Design: American Exceptionalism and Empire, revised edn (New York: Cornell University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  23. and W. LeFeber (1998) The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansionism, 1860– 1898, revised edn (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 178–179, and 344; also John Bockstoce (1986), Whales, Ice, and Men: The History of Whaling in the Western Arctic, (Seattle: University of Washington Press) pp. 256–89.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 200–7; Library and Archives Canada, RG 15, vol. 1, file ‘Arctic Islands’, contains a copy of W. F. King (1905) Report upon the Title of Canada to the Islands to the North of Mainland Canada (Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Saint-Pierre (2008) Joseph-Elzéar Bernier 1852–1934, translation by W. Barr, (Montreal: Baraka Books).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. D. Grant (1989) ‘Myths of the North in the Canadian Ethos’, The Northern Review, 3:4, 15–41;

    Google Scholar 

  28. also S. D. Grant (1998) ‘Arctic Wilderness — and Other Mythologies’, Journal of Canadian Studies, 33:2, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For more details about the murder trials, objectives and consequences, see S. D. Grant (2002) Arctic Justice: the First Murder Trial in the Eastern Arctic, Pond Inlet, 1923 (Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 227–35; for details on the Byrd expedition, see N. Fogelson (1992) Arctic Exploration and International Relations, 1920–1932 (Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press).

    Google Scholar 

  31. As confirmed in S. W. Boggs (1933) The Polar Regions: Geographical and Historical Data for Consideration in a Study of Claims to Sovereignty in the Arctic and Antarctic Regions, 1990 edition (Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein & Company), pp. 46–7. Boggs was an official in the geographical division of the State Department.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 249–51; R. Vaughan (1991) Northwest Greenland: A History (Orono: University of Maine Press);

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Grant (1999) ‘Why the St. Roch? Why the Northwest Passage? New Answers to Old Questions’, Arctic, 46:1, pp. 82–7. For history of US forces in Greenland,

    Google Scholar 

  34. see S. Conn, R. Engelman and B. Fairchild (2000) United States in World War I, Volume II: Guarding the United States and Its Outposts (Washington: Government Printing Office for the Center of Military History), ch. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Autobiographical accounts add further details: Col. B. Balchen, Maj. C. Ford and Maj. O. La Farge (1944) War Below Zero: The Battle for Greenland (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company);

    Google Scholar 

  36. or W. S. Carlson (1967) Lifelines Through the Arctic (New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce).

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. D. Grant (1989) Sovereignty or Security? Government Policy in the Canadian North, 1939–1950 (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press), pp. 70–102; the reference to the ‘army of occupation’ is found in ‘Notes on Developments in North-West Canada’, 6 April 1943, by British High Commissioner Malcolm MacDonald, in Library and Archives Canada, W. L. M. King Papers, MG26 J4, vol. 309, file 3283.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Grant, Sovereignty or Security, pp. 103–28. For a more recent publication, see K. S. Coates et al. (2009) Arctic Front: Defending Canada in the Far North (Toronto: Thomas Allen Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  39. For an American perspective supported by impeccable research, see J. T. Jockel (1987) No Boundaries Upstairs: Canada, the United States, and the Origins of North American Air Defense (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press);

    Google Scholar 

  40. and Jockel (1991) Security to the North: Canada-U.S. Defense Relations in the 1990s (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 319–32; also S. D. Grant (1990) ‘A Case of Compounded Error: The Inuit Resettlement Project 1953 and the Government Response 1990’, Northern Perspectives, 19:1, pp. 3–29;

    Google Scholar 

  42. and F. Tester and P. Kulchyski (1994) Tammarniit (Mistakes): Inuit Relocation in the Eastern Arctic, 1939–1963 (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Inuit Circumpolar Conference (1992) Principles and Elements of a Comprehensive Arctic Policy (Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  44. see also M. M. Simon (1996) Inuit: One Future — One Arcti (Peterborough: Cidar Press);

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Lynge (1996) Inuit: The Story of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference (Nuuk, Greenland: Atuakkiorfik).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Grant, Polar Imperative, pp. 391–4; J. English (2013) Ice and Water: Politics, Peoples and the Arctic Council (Toronto: Penguin Canada/Allan Lane).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Shelagh D. Grant

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grant, S.D. (2016). Arctic Governance and the Relevance of History. In: Berry, D.A., Bowles, N., Jones, H. (eds) Governing the North American Arctic. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493910_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics