Advertisement

Institutions, Resources, and the Governance of Postcolonial Greenland

  • Richard C. Powell
Part of the St Antony’s Series book series (STANTS)

Abstract

There are different visions of Greenland. For the inhabitants, Kalaallit Nunaat is a homeland with increasing autonomy and independence.1 For most of the world, Greenland is often reduced to its ice cap, a ‘global laboratory’ for science, and an emblem of climate change for environmental NGOs and, increasingly, global civil society. For Denmark, the island is a constituent part of the Danish Kingdom. For North Americans, especially the US military, Greenland is geographically, geologically, and continentally part of North America. For some representatives in the European Parliament or the European Commission, Greenland is part of Europe, offering a further window for the European Union to develop its Northern Dimension. For many new actors in the Arctic, whether for multi-nationals wanting to develop resources or Asian states such as China and South Korea, Greenland is depicted as a ‘newly-independent state’ seeking new partners for development.

Keywords

European Economic Community North Atlantic Treaty Organization Global Civil Society Nordic Region Postcolonial Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    On the Norse colonies in Greenland, see K. A. Seaver (1996) The Frozen Echo: Greenland and the Exploration of North America ca. A.D. 1000–1500 (Stanford: Stanford University Press);Google Scholar
  2. and K. A. Seaver (2008) ‘ “Pygmies” of the Far North’, Journal of World History, 19, 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. C. Powell (2010) ‘Lines of Possession? The Anxious Constitution of a Polar Geopolitics’, Political Geography, 29, 74–7;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. R. C. Powell and K. Dodds (2014) ‘Polar Geopolitics’, in R. C. Powell and K. Dodds, eds, Polar Geopolitics? Knowledges, Resources and Legal Regimes (Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    K. Loftsdóttir and L. Jensen (2012) ‘Nordic Exceptionalism and the Nordic “Others”’, in K. Loftsdóttir and L. Jensen, eds, Whiteness and Postcolonialism in the Nordic Region: Exceptionalism, Migrant Others and National Identities (New York: Springer), pp. 1–11;Google Scholar
  6. L. Jensen (2012) ‘Danishness as Whiteness in Crisis: Emerging Post-Imperial and Development Aid Anxieties’, in K. Loftsdóttir and L. Jensen, eds, Whiteness and Postcolonialism, pp. 105–17.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    E. Volquardsen and L.-A. Körber (2014) ‘The Postcolonial North Atlantic: An Introduction’, in L.-A. Körber and E. Volquardsen, eds, The Postcolonial North Atlantic: Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands (Berlin: NordeuropaInstitut der Humboldt-Universität), pp. 7–29.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    D. Scott (1995) ‘Colonial Governmentality’, Social Text, 43, 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    On this, see the important work of Danish historian Søren Rud. S. Rud (2009) ‘A Correct Admixture: The Ambiguous Project of Civilising in Nineteenth-Century Greenland’, Itinerario, 33, 29–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. and S. Rud (2014) ‘Governance and Tradition in Nineteenth-Century Greenland’, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 16, 551–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8.
    Loftsdóttir and Jensen, ‘Nordic Exceptionalism’. See also K. Hvenegård-Lassen and S. Maurer (2012) ‘Bodies and Boundaries’, in K. Loftsdóttir and L. Jensen, eds, Whiteness and Postcolonialism, pp. 119–39;Google Scholar
  12. R. Adler-Nissen and U. P. Gad (2014) ‘Introduction: Postimperial Sovereignty Games in the Nordic region’, Cooperation and Conflict, 49, 3–32;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. and M. Naum and J. M. Nordin (2013) ‘Introduction: Situating Scandinavian Colonialism’, in M. Naum and J. M. Nordin, eds, Scandinavian Colonialism and the Rise of Modernity: Small Time Agents in a Global Arena (New York: Springer), pp. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 9.
    The Danish and Norwegian crowns were joined from 1380 until 1814. For a brief discussion of colonial relations between Denmark and Norway, see I. B. Neumann (2014) ‘Imperializing Norden’, Cooperation and Conflict, 49, 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    A. K. Sørensen (2006) Denmark–Greenland in the Twentieth Century (Copenhagen: Commission for Scientific Research in Greenland), p.12.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    U. P. Gad (2014) ‘Greenland: A Post-Danish Sovereign Nation-state in the Making’, Cooperation and Conflict, 49, 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 18.
    In Greenlandic, the term was niuertogarfik. See the discussion in R. Petersen (1995) ‘Colonialism as Seen from a Former Colonized Area’, Arctic Anthropology, 32, 118–26.Google Scholar
  18. 23.
    J. Boel and S. T. Thuesen (2010) ‘Greenland and the World: The Impact of World War II on Danish-Greenlandic Relations’, in K. Langgård, F. Nielsen, B. Kleist Pedersen, K. Pedersen, and J. Rygaard, eds, Cultural and Social Research in Greenland — Selected Essays 1992–2010 (Nuuk: Forlaget Atuagkat), pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
  19. 29.
    Lill Rastad Bjørst’s excellent work is an important contribution here. See L. Rastad Bjørst (2008) En Anden Verden: Fordomme og stereotyper om Grønland og Arktis (Copenhagen: BIOS).Google Scholar
  20. 31.
    L. Jensen (2012) Danmark: Rigsfællesskab, tropekolonier og den postkoloniale arv (Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag).Google Scholar
  21. 32.
    B. Blüdnikow (1989) ‘Denmark during the First World War’, Journal of Contemporary History, 24, 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 33.
    D. A. Berry (2012) ‘Cryolite, The Canadian Aluminium Industry and the American Occupation of Greenland during the Second World War’, Polar Journal, 2, 219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 42.
    J. Dahl (2010) ‘Identity, Urbanization and Political Demography in Greenland’, Acta Borealia: A Nordic Journal of Circumpolar Societies, 27, 125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Strandsbjerg, (2014), ‘Making Sense of Contemporary Greenland: Indigeneity, Resources and Sovereignty’, in Richard C. Powell and Klaus Dodds, eds, Polar Geopolitics?: Knowledges, Resources and Legal Regimes (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 259–76;Google Scholar
  25. F. Sowa (2013) ‘Relations of Power and Domination in a World Polity: The Politics of Indigeneity and National Identity in Greenland’, in L. Heininen, ed., Arctic Yearbook 2013 (Akureyri, Iceland: Northern Research Forum), pp. 184–93;Google Scholar
  26. and K. Thisted (2013), ‘Discourses of Indigeneity: Branding Greenland in the Age of Self-Government and Climate Change’, in S. Sörlin, ed., Science, Geopolitics and Culture in the Polar Region: Norden Beyond Borders (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate), pp. 227–58.Google Scholar
  27. 43.
    As Damien Degeorges argues, this requires very little lobbying capacity from the perspective of a major Multi-National Company. See D. Degeorges (2013) Denmark, Greenland and the Arctic: Challenges and Opportunities of Becoming the Meeting Place of Global Powers (Copenhagen: Royal Danish Defence College).Google Scholar
  28. 44.
    According to anthropologist Mark Nuttall, the BMP is known locally in Nuuk as ‘The Republic’ because of its perceived power, lack of transparency, and the absence of any appeals process for its decisions. See M. Nuttall (2013) ‘Zero-Tolerance, Uranium and Greenland’s Mining Future’, Polar Journal, 3, 368–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 45.
    H. Petersen (2001) ‘Legal Cultures in the Danish Realm: Greenland in Focus’, in K. Hastrup, ed., Legal Cultures and Human Rights: The Challenge of Diversity (Leiden: Kluwer Law International), pp. 67–83;Google Scholar
  30. H. Petersen (2008) ‘Legal Cultures on the Move’, Retfærd (Nordic Journal of Law and Justice), 31:123 (4), 3–22;Google Scholar
  31. H. Petersen (2008) ‘Privileges, Rights and Advantages: Inuit, Danish, and European Subjects in the Making’, Scandinavian Studies in Law, 53, 205–18.Google Scholar
  32. 47.
    R. Hubbard (2014) ‘Mining in Greenland and Free, Prior and Informed Consent: A Role for Corporations?’, Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift/Nordic Environmental Law Journal, 1, 99–118.Google Scholar
  33. 48.
    Government of Greenland (2014) Greenland’s Oil and Mineral Strategy 2014– 2018 (Nuuk: Government of Greenland).Google Scholar
  34. 49.
    C. Vestergaard (2015) ‘Greenland, Denmark and the Pathway to Uranium Supplier Status’, The Extractive Industries and Society, 2, 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 52.
    A. J. K. Bailes and L. Heininen (2012) Strategy papers on the Arctic or High North: A Comparative Study and Analysis (Reykjavik: University of Iceland); and Gad, ‘Greenland’.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Richard C. Powell 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. Powell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations