Skip to main content
  • 234 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to answer the question of how the Egyptian authoritarian regime dealt with businessmen in opposition parties and opposition movements who refuse to be co-opted. To answer this question, this chapter builds on the work of Ellen Lust-Okar,1 which finds that Egypt’s authoritarian regime maintained its survival by creating a divided political environment between the legal and illegal opposition. However, my findings are distinct from Lust-Okar’s, since I argue that in Egypt, the regime renewed its authoritarianism by creating a divided political environment among parties and movements in the opposition on other levels. On one level, the regime co-opted some businessmen in legalized opposition parties and used them to create a divided political environment inside those opposition parties that refused to be co-opted by the regime’s clientelistic chain. On another level, the regime created a divided political environment among parties and movements in the illegal opposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ellen Lust-Okar. 2004. “Divided They Rule: The Management and Manipulation of Political Opposition,” Journal of Democracy 36(2): 139–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holger Albrecht. 2010. “Political Opposition and Arab Authoritarianism: Some Conceptual Remarks,” in Contentious Politics in the Middle East: Political Opposition under Authoritarianism, ed. Holger Albrecht (Gainesville: University Press of Florida), pp. 17–33.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cited in David C. Kang. 2002. “Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and Developmental State in South Korea,” International Organization 56(1):185–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eric Trager. 2012. “Trapped and Untrapped: Mubarak’s Opponents on the Eve of His Oust” (PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joshua Stacher. 2004. “Parties Over: The Demise of Egypt’s Opposition Parties,” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 31(2): 231–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ninette Fahmy. 2002. The Politics of Egypt: State-Society Relationship (London: Routledge), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tamir Moustafa. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics and Economic Development in Egypt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 94.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Maye Kassem. 1999. In the Guise of Democracy: Governance in Contemporary Egypt (London: Ithaca Press), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eberhard Kienle. 2001. A Grand Delusion: Democracy and Economic Reform in Egypt (London: I. B. Tauris), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cited in Moheb Zaki. 1999. Egyptian Business Elites: Their Visions and Investment Behavior (Cairo: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and the Arab Center for Development and Future Research), p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yoram Meital. 2006. “The Struggle over Political Order in Egypt: The 2005 Elections,” Middle East Journal 60(2): 266.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ray Bush and Jeremy Keenan. 2006. “North Africa: Power, Politics and Promise,” Review of African Political Economy 33(108): 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wael Nawara. 2010. “Interview with Wael Nawara, Secretary General of the Ghad (Tomorrow) Party.” The Carnegie Papers. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. At http://egyptelections.carnegieendowment.org/2010/11/22/interview –with-wael-nawara-secretary-general-of-the-ghad-tomorrow-party, accessed March 9, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibrahim Eissa. 2010. The Book of the Destour: The Story of a Country and a Newspaper (in Arabic; Cairo: El Masry for Publishing), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ministry of Health. “The Minister Decree 350 for Regulation of Tramadol.” At http://www.eda.mohp.gov.eg/Download/Docs/Decree350.pdf, accessed March 26, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hesham Al-Awadi. 2005. “Mubarak and the Islamists: Why Did the Honeymoon End?,” Middle East Journal 59(1): 63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ellen Lust-Okar. 2005. Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 141.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Cited in Mona El-Ghobashy. 2005. “The Metamorphosis of the Egyptian Muslim Brothers,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 37(3): 378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See Alaa-Al Din Arafat. 2009. The Mubarak Leadership and Future of Democracy in Egypt (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 172.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Hesham Al-Awadi. 2004. In Pursuit of Legitimacy: The Muslim Brothers and Mubarak (London: Tauris Academic Studies), p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sawasiya Center for Human Rights. 2008. “Report about the Military Trial of the Leaders of the Muslim Brothers” (in Arabic; Cairo: Sawasiya), pp. 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mona El-Ghobashy. 2012a, “The Dynamics of Elections under Mubarak,” in The Journey to Tahrir: Revolution, Protest and Social Change in Egypt, ed. Jeannie Sowers and Chris Toensing (London: Verso), p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cited in Jason Brownlee. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 136. Bracketed insertions by Brownlee.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Alaa-Al Din Arafat. 2009. The Mubarak Leadership and Future of Democracy in Egypt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 172.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. International Crisis Group. 2005. “Reforming Egypt: In Search of a Strategy.” At http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle %20East %20North %20Africa/North %20Africa/Egypt/Reforming %20Egypt %20In %20Search %20of %20a %20Strategy.pdf, accessed July 9, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Samer Shehata and Joshua Stacher. 2012. “The Muslim Brothers in Mubarak’s Last Decade,” in The Journey to Tahrir: Revolution, Protest and Social Change in Egypt, ed. Jeannie Sowers and Chris Toensing (London: Verso), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Issand El Amrani. 2012. “Controlled Reform in Egypt: Neither Reformist nor Controlled,” in The Journey to Tahrir: Revolution, Protest and Social Change in Egypt, ed. Jeannie Sowers and Chris Toensing (London: Verso), p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Neha Sahgal. 2008. “Divided We Stand, but United We Oppose: Opposition Alliances in Egypt and Pakistan” (PhD dissertation, University of Maryland), p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Amr Hamzawy and Nathan J. Brown. 2010. “The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood: Islamist Participation in a Closing Political Environment.” The Carnegie Papers. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. At http://carnegieendowment.org/files/muslim bros participation.pdf, accessed July 11, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Safinaz El Tarouty

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tarouty, S.E. (2015). Businessmen in the Opposition. In: Businessmen, Clientelism, and Authoritarianism in Egypt. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493385_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics