Abstract
Gongsun could dispute the connection drawn between different color revolutions. First, each color would be an act of positioning which should have only reflect the formation of reality. Second, a color could not represent those who wear it. Third, a color was a trigger of emotion and the intellectual interpretation of rally was to spread a much broader implication to motivate further action. In short, the color revolution is not a revolution. The color signifies mutual estrangement as well as foregone civility. It does not designate liberalism incurred by the notion of revolution against the conservative authoritarian regime, nor sitedness in which hybridity is at best an embarrassing reality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Adam Roberts and Timothy Garton Ash (eds.), Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-violent Action from Gandhi to the Present ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 )
Kurt Schock, Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies (University of Minnesota Press, 2005).
Abel Polese Donnacha Ó Beacháin, “The Color Revolution Virus and Authoritarian Antidotes: Political Protest and Regime Counterattacks in Post-Communist Spaces,” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 19, 2 (Spring 2011): 111–132
Jeanne L. Wilson, “The Legacy of the Color Revolutions for Russian Politics and Foreign Policy,” Problems of Post-Communism 57, 2 (2010): 21–36
Zeinab Abul-Magd, “Occupying Tahrir Square: The Myths and the Realities of the Egyptian Revolution,” South Atlantic Quarterly 111, 3 (2012): 565–572
John James Kennedy, “What Is the Color of a Non-Revolution: Why the Jasmine Revolution and Arab Spring Did Not Spread to China.” Whitehead J. Dipl. & Int’l Rel 13, 1 (2012): 63–74.
Karatnycky Adrian, “Ukraine’s Orange Revolution,” Foreign Affairs 84 2 (March/April 2005): 35–52
Joshua A. Tucker, “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions,” Perspectives on Politics 5 3 (September 2007): 535–551
Mark R. Beissinger, “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5, 2 (2007): 259–276.
Taras Kuzio, Ukraine: State and Nation Building ( London: Routledge, 1998 )
Vladimir P. Lukin, “Our Security Predicament,” Foreign Policy 88 (Autumn, 1992): 57–75
John Locke and P. H. Nidditch (ed.) Essay ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975 ).
R. Hastie, A Computer Simulation of Person Memory, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 (1988): 423–447
R. Fazio, M. Powell and P. Herr, Toward a Process Model of the Attitude-behavior Relation: Accessing Ones Attitude upon Mere Observation of the Attitude Object, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1985): 723–735.
N. Anderson and S. Hubert, “Effects of Concomitant Verbal Recall on Order Effects in Personality Impression Formation,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2 (1963): 379–391.
Mark Kramer, “Russian policy toward the Commonwealth of Independent States: recent trends and future prospects,” Problems of Post-Communism 55, 6 (2008): 3–19
Andrei P. Tsygankov, “US-Russia Relations in the Post-Western World,” Responding to a Resurgent Russia ( New York: Springer, 2012 ). 35–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Chih-yu Shih and Po-tsan Yu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shih, Cy., Yu, Pt. (2015). The Color Revolution. In: Post-Western International Relations Reconsidered: The Pre-Modern Politics of Gongsun Long. Global Political Thinkers. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493217_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493217_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56957-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49321-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)